Reply With Quote
Well hot damn, finally someone came into this thread to do something other than whine and that the heat didn't get enough calls.
Props to Bill Brasky.
Ahahahaha, this guy is clearly butthurt. 2 wins away got.Oh, and poor poor Chrissy got her wittle eye poked and didn't get a wittle foul call, let's all complain and for poor Chrissy.
Manu had his nose broken by Dirk's elbow last year. And the refs called HIM for the foul yet I don't recall any of you little pansies whining and crying about that.
Well hot damn, finally someone came into this thread to do something other than whine and that the heat didn't get enough calls.
Props to Bill Brasky.
Tbh I read the thread and your doing a good job in here.Well hot damn, finally someone came into this thread to do something other than whine and that the heat didn't get enough calls.
Props to Bill Brasky.
T Jastal...
is obviously blind and trolling you guys.
The Mavs got every call and still choked at the end. Water is wet. Sky is blue...
Mavs choked...
The double-dribble call on Lebron was just scott foster trying to give the game to the mavs.
If you watch the replay, when Lebron goes up and loses control of the ball--watch Crawford signal that the ball was deflected...then Lebron regains possession without dribbling---so this was a new possession...then as soon as Lebron dribbled...Scott Foster calls the double-dribble.
Chandler pushed and rooted everyone near the basket all night with no call---but as soon as the heat did the same ...the refs called every little touch and push.
Watch the game Jastal...without---the blinders.
ball was NOT deflected. he knew it, and gave the doubledribble as a makeup call for the travel that should have been called on lebron for the pass to himself.
there were bad calls, but they went both ways. i cant count how many time dirk got hammered on drives with no call, or several clearly incorrect out of bounds calls. then on the other end, a few times lebron got hit with no call, most specifically when Marion jumped into him close to the end. then there was a foul called on mahinmi when Haslem fell out of bounds and was barely, if at all touched. or the push in the back on Dirk, that for some reason led to Mahinmi getting FTs. it was bad and inconsistent all night, both ways.
and dont forget, the Chalmers 3 at the end of the 1st that was allowed. if they called him for a backcourt violation like they should have, its very possible the outcome could have been different, considering the Heat only won by 2, and got 3 illegal points.
5 pages of asshole SpursMavs Fans ing about officiating,,,per usual.
bull ..Miami couldn't buy a call most of the game
Isn't it amazing how the only examples these schucks can come up with are the same lame handful of bull that I've already dissected several times over in this thread and either debunked or dismissed?
+1 Agree on the Lebron "double dribble". Obviously the wrong call but it was a makeup call and makeup calls can and do happen. Either traveling or double dribbling, really doesn't matter, it achieved the same result. It's a violation and a turnover. Case closed.
-1 I disagree the Marion contact was ruled incidental since Lebron didn't go up with his shot like he should have. All Lebron had to do was fling the ball toward the hoop and he would have been going to the line for foul shots. He didn't even have to move or contort his body into Marion. I think the refs were probably so surprised that Lebron chose not to do this that they let this incidental contact go.
-1 After furthur review I gotta admit the Chalmers 3 at the end of the 1st actually was legit since the tip of his foot was touching the line when he jumped in the air across midcourt to catch Haslem's pass. Had his foot been behind the line even 1 inch it would have been a backcourt violation. Not that the refs would have actually called it as such, I'm sure they would have pretended not to notice.
Don't know if read the thread dumbass, but it's the san antonio heat fans doing all the ing.5 pages of asshole SpursMavs Fans ing about officiating,,,per usual.
From the research I have found, this is incorrect.
Both feet and the ball have to be completely over the line, otherwise its a backcourt violation. Chalmers had one foot on the line, and I believe the other was behind the line. Should have been a violation.
every call went the Mavs way and they still couldn't get over the hump ....... Dirk is playing the role of LeBron James when he was in cleveland and Jason Terry is now Mo Williams ..... the second best player on the team who melts down ........ brutal
[[[From the research I have found, this is incorrect.
Both feet and the ball have to be completely over the line, otherwise its a backcourt violation. Chalmers had one foot on the line, and I believe the other was behind the line. Should have been a violation.]]]
I've seen a lot of those instances in these playoffs, and it's simply not called. And there was an 8 second violation late last night that was not called on Miami. Both feet were not in the front court when the shot clock struck 16, but, nobody ed.
Maybe if he caught the ball while stationary this might be true. But I think since Chalmers had leapt into the air from that position (of one foot touching the line BARELY) he is considered to be over the line when he catches the pass legally on the other side of the line.
According to your theory a guy standing legally across midcourt could reach back and snag a pass behind the line and this would be considered a violation. Unless I misunderstand your position.
I noticed that too, but oh well.
Like I said, officiating did not heavily cost either team last night. It was ing horrible all around, its just that the things that favored the Mavs were more noticable, while Miami got away with sly things like backcourt violations, balls getting tipped out of bounds by them and being incorrectly called, and being awarded ty flop calls, whereas the Mavs got away with more physical contact.
Your shtick is much more entertaining. Dance for us again, forum monkey.5 pages of asshole SpursMavs Fans ing about officiating,,,per usual.
Dude, the rule is that both feet and the ball must be completely across the line. He caught the ball with a foot on the line and the other foot behind. They missed the call. The end.
I can understand how it got missed considering how quickly it happened, but it was a missed call.
Thanks for being the lucky 100th to come into this thread claiming every call went the mavs way and yet offer not a shred of proof backing up said theory.
Please choose your door prize: There is the shadowflame backseat tissue dispenser, the CryHavoc tp head dispenser, or the joshdaboss kleenex model truck. Thanks!
No that's incorrect. He jumped into the air from that position and caught the pass in midair but well across the line.
I don't know for 100% sure what the ruling is for that particular situation, but It think he's okay as long as some part of his feet were touching the line (or across the line) before the jump takes place.
Besides the fact that most mavfans themselves acknowledge that most of the calls went their way, you jock sniffing cuckThanks for being the lucky 100th to come into this thread claiming every call went the mavs way and yet offer not a shred of proof backing up said theory.
Please choose your door prize: There is the shadowflame backseat tissue dispenser, the CryHavoc tp head dispenser, or the joshdaboss kleenex model truck. Thanks!
foot was on the line
according to rule, both feet and ball must be over the line to be in the frontcourt
backcourt violation
No he can't be touching the line because the mid court line is back court.
NBA rule 4 section IV
b. A team's backcourt consists of the entire midcourt line and the rest of the court to include the opponent's basket and inbounds part of the backboard.
c. A ball being held by a player: (1) is in the frontcourt if neither the ball nor the player is touching the backcourt, (2) is in the backcourt if either the ball or player is touching the backcourt.
He had a foot on the line when he got the ball which makes it a backcourt violation. Missed call, and it also should be reviewable imo.
Dumbass commentators don't even know the rule. Mike Breen was saying that it would've been a backcourt violation if he hadn't stepped on the line
As I've said before about 3 times in this thread already, I don't really consider mavfan opinion viable right now. I'm almost certain they are all still in shock that the refs actually made fair calls on both sides (albeit not always the right ones lol) and didn't let the heat's thuggery to take over the game.
Gate, with the goods!
LOL my goodness. This is still going on?
Talk about total denial.
What an uber idiot.
Tjastal just call it a day and go your own way.
Yes, you're wrong and yes the refs were one sided. When even the Mavs fan know they were having some home cooking and you still in denial says alot about your maturity and knowledge process.
All you go is how Charmer made a questionable shot from half court. That's bull .
The Mavs went to the freethrow line 27 times to Heat's 15.
Mavs also missed 5 shots from there so that's 5 points.
The 3 pointer doesn't come into play as the Mavs had several things going for them and they still couldn't muster up a win.
Just shut up dude.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
