Page 9 of 13 FirstFirst ... 5678910111213 LastLast
Results 201 to 225 of 315
  1. #201
    Veteran Thompson's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Post Count
    2,481
    latest mock draft on draft express has the spurs picking davis bertans(SF)

    http://www.draftexpress.com/nba-mock-draft/2011/
    What ever happened to Sanikidze? Has that ship sailed?

  2. #202
    Hello Moto elemento's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Post Count
    3,101
    This draft is bad in terms of superstar talent IMO.

    Late picks like the Spurs pick have pretty much the same amount of talent if you compare them with drafts in the past. The Magic got Daniel Orton with the 29th pick last year. He is a not a better prospect than Johnson, Nogueira or Vucevic.

  3. #203
    Believe. Tyrone Jenkins's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Post Count
    480
    When was the last time a BIG man (read that as PF or C) was drafted beyond the 20th pick that ended up scoring more than 15 pts and grabbing more the 8 boards a game? Carlos Boozer was actually a 35th overall and is an exception. If you think Mehmet Okur is good, then he might be included (38th pick).

    TD was a 1st overall pick. So was Dwight Howard, Andrew Bogut, Shaq, Chris Weber, Larry Johnson, Danny Manning, Pervis Ellison, Patrick Ewing, Hakeem Olajuwon, Elton Brand, Derrick Coleman, Kenyon Martin and Yao Ming. About 95% of all the centers and power forwards that ended up being halfway decent were all drafted w/in the 1st 15 picks. Guards (both point and shooting) drafted later have a far higher probability of success than big men drafted later.

    Good big men are just harder to fine. The Spurs lucked up w/ Blair but even as good as he is, his length (or lack thereof) prevents him from seeing the floor during the playoffs in Popovich's scheme.

    If the Spurs are serious about drafting a quality big man, their best course of action is to either wait til next year (when the draft will hopefully be stronger) or trade up into the lottery area. The possibility exists (I think) to trade w/ the Cavs to their 4th pick or even w/ Minnesota for their 2nd. Perhaps we can trade TP and Blair and/or Splitter to Toronto @ 5, Milwaukee @ 10 (rumored to want to get rid of Jennings) or Houston @ 14.

    Personally, I think that if TP is traded, then the Spurs are officially rebuilding and every attempt to get the BEST BIG MAN they can right now is imperative. Why now? Couple of reasons: getting someone skilled now while Tim Duncan is still playing is best opportunity for him to teach the rookie (who know what Tim will want to do after retiring); having a marquee PF or C will help attract other players that will be free agents next year (such as CP3, Dwight Howard, etc.); most important, the current structure of the West necessitates it - between Portland, LA, Memphis and Dallas, the Spurs need an athletic, shot-blocking, rebouding force to answer the likes of Aldridge, Gasol, Randolph and Dirk.
    Last edited by Tyrone Jenkins; 06-02-2011 at 08:08 PM.

  4. #204
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Post Count
    110
    If the Spurs are serious about drafting a quality big man, their best course of action is to either wait til next year (when the draft will hopefully be stronger) or trade up into the lottery area. The possibility exists (I think) to trade w/ the Cavs to their 4th pick or even w/ Minnesota for their 2nd. Perhaps we can trade TP and Blair and/or Splitter to Toronto @ 5, Milwaukee @ 10 (rumored to want to get rid of Jennings) or Houston @
    That's a lot to trade for a draft pick.

  5. #205
    Believe. Tyrone Jenkins's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Post Count
    480
    The draft pick would come accompany players...we'd probably swap our 29th pick for theirs.

  6. #206
    Thanks Tim Vic Petro's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Post Count
    1,491
    Next year. I wouldn't trade Tony Parker for anyone in this draft. But if we are the same flawed team at the deadline next year and we can trade for a lottery ticket in the Anthony Davis sweepstakes, then you trade. Davis can change a franchise. Even a #3 pick next year can get you McAdoo or Perry Jones or Harrison Barnes all of which are at least comparable to the talent level of this year's #1

  7. #207
    Believe. Tyrone Jenkins's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Post Count
    480
    Detroit needs a SG and PF. I would trade Neal or Anderson and Blair for Chris Wilcox and the #8 pick. With that, I'd take Chris Singleton.

  8. #208
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    9,195
    Trade Hill and Blair and get two additional picks and get these kids:

    Malcom Thomas SF/PF San Diego - 6'9, 225 pds, 11 Pts, FG. 53%, Rebounds 8.1, Blocks 2.0 (A tough kid who can rebound/block shots and will be able to guard SF he has very good lateral quickness - the opposite of Bonner, Blair and RJ)

    Keith Benson PF/C Oakland - 6'11 223 pds, 17.9 Pts, FG. 54%, Rebounds 10.0, Blocks 3.6 (Great rebounder/blocks shots just needs to juice up for about six months to add bulk)

    Lucas Nogureria C - 7'0 225 pds, NA STATS (D Leauge just one year and hire a great weight coach for him)

    Darrius Morris PG Michigan - 6'5, 190 pds - 15.0 Pts, Assist. 6.7, Rebounds 4.0 (Will easily be our second best pg and could replace Tony if traded in 2012)

    Good PG, Good PF, Good or Great Center........
    Last edited by BackHome; 06-04-2011 at 01:11 AM.

  9. #209
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    9,195
    Next year. I wouldn't trade Tony Parker for anyone in this draft. But if we are the same flawed team at the deadline next year and we can trade for a lottery ticket in the Anthony Davis sweepstakes, then you trade. Davis can change a franchise. Even a #3 pick next year can get you McAdoo or Perry Jones or Harrison Barnes all of which are at least comparable to the talent level of this year's #1
    The only way we get to trade Tony for top three spots in next year draft is if we trade him this year for next years unprocted pick and we get lucky in that team getting a top three pick. That is almost as much chance as us get Kobe from the Lakers..lol

  10. #210
    Thanks Tim Vic Petro's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Post Count
    1,491
    The only way we get to trade Tony for top three spots in next year draft is if we trade him this year for next years unprocted pick and we get lucky in that team getting a top three pick. That is almost as much chance as us get Kobe from the Lakers..lol
    Same way Deron Williams or Carmelo Anthony were traded at the deadline for multiple top picks and a boatload of other assets. Parker isn't valued as highly but I don't think it's too much to ask basically half that compensation in return.

    Luck will play a big part in whether the draft pick we'd get in return is top 5 or top 10 or whatever, but the Spurs have been lucky when it comes to the lottery

  11. #211
    Believe. Tyrone Jenkins's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Post Count
    480
    I like Tony Parker. I really do. But, I'll be honest . . . he's replaceable. And doing so won't be to difficult.

    Tim Duncan is irreplaceable. Arguably the best PF to play the game. I doubt any team (including the Spurs) will ever draft someone that good at the PF or C position ever again.

    But TP, he was a late round pick. So was Manu. So are a # of other point and shooting guards. There's more of them. People are just shorter - 6'10' and taller guys w/ that kind of abilty to score, rebound and defend come along every so often. There are probably 2-3 Tony Parker like PGs in THIS draft. Are there any Duncans?

    My opinion - keep TP if trading him won't bring about Dwight Howard or someone of that caliber. If it won't, then the Spurs need to set themselves up for a top 5 draft pick NEXT year (hopefully there will be a halfway decent PF or C to replace Duncan).

    Either that, or wallow around in mediocrity for the next 10-15 years....

  12. #212
    Bruce Almighty Bruno's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    19,194
    An interesting commented mock draft:
    http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news;_yl...ug=ycn-8581953

  13. #213
    Veteran Spurs da champs's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    3,160
    I hope not we need a big more then anything & someone who can contribute right away.

  14. #214
    Watching the collapse benefactor's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Post Count
    42,233
    I hope not we need a big more then anything & someone who can contribute right away.
    There's nothing like that in this draft where the Spurs are picking. Heck...the whole bottom half of the first round is full of players that are either projects or very end of the bench role players.

    With all the money they are locked in to, there is a very, very good chance the Spurs pick someone they don't have to pay next season. Bertrans is a decent option in that respect.

  15. #215
    Believe. admiralsnackbar's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Post Count
    4,010
    There's nothing like that in this draft where the Spurs are picking. Heck...the whole bottom half of the first round is full of players that are either projects or very end of the bench role players.

    With all the money they are locked in to, there is a very, very good chance the Spurs pick someone they don't have to pay next season. Bertrans is a decent option in that respect.
    Been thinking the same thing. Short of a miracle draft steal, a healthy Anderson and Butler, a Duncan contract renegotiation, and a trade that's completely lopsided in our favor, we aren't going to contend next year.

    I'm not advocating a tank job, but rather that we may as well accept the window is closed and start drafting developing, stashable talent so that once Tim and Manu come off the books after some lackluster seasons we can have a 2-3 drafts-worth of cheap, young players to choose from and some FA play money.

  16. #216
    Believe. Tyrone Jenkins's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Post Count
    480
    Been thinking the same thing. Short of a miracle draft steal, a healthy Anderson and Butler, a Duncan contract renegotiation, and a trade that's completely lopsided in our favor, we aren't going to contend next year.
    I think a trade involving Parker, Jefferson and Blair and a 1st round pick this year (know one is of any real value at 29) for LeMarcus Aldridge and Andre Miller and Portlands 1st pick (21st). Or, Marc Gasol and OJ Mayo. Perhaps the same for Nene and Raymond Felton. Maybe even Josh Smith and Kurt Heinrich. I kinda like Aaron Brooks, Mickael Pietrus, Channing Frye and the Suns 1st round pick (13th).

    Either way, it really depends on who the Spurs see as a possible scoring BIG for their future. Can it be Aldridge. Josh Smith? I doubt Nene, Gasol or Frye are enough of a force to build a franchise around.

    Regardless of what the Spurs do, the key is a franchise PF or C. PGs and SGs are a dime a dozen...

  17. #217
    real fans go bald mountainballer's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Post Count
    3,238
    35 players have worked out with Spurs with some of them having two workouts. At that 35 players, you must add players whose workout hasn't been reported and players who will work in the 3 remaining weeks before the draft.

    There is an obvious observation to make: Spurs are very active and look in depth at draft prospects this year.

    Some conclusions can be drawn from that activity:
    - These workouts cost some money. Sometimes teams reduce them for financial reasons. It's always good to know that Spurs aren't in that situation.
    - Spurs aren't in the mindset of trading their pick. If they like nobody at #29 of if they get a great offer for it, they might trade it but it isn't their first option.
    - This draft is described as a bad one. If Spurs want additional picks, it should be easier than usual to get them.
    definitely looks as if Spurs at least plan to use their picks. some of the invited players are likely out of their draft range (Vucevuc, Shumpert), or even definitely out of their range (Morris, Kanter interview).
    that might be an indication that they try to move up and/or acquire another 1st round pick. the #18,#19 and #20 pick are or might be on the market (#20 pick from the Wolves definitely is).
    if Vucevic is their target, as many here guess, a pick in that range won't be good enough IMO. he is ranked around 20 in most mocks, but I'm pretty sure he will be picked around 10. he just is to talented and offers to much size to pass. and the success of players like Lopez and Monroe will encourage teams to invest a high pick in such a player. I can see him go to Bobcats at #9 for example.

    my hope for a pick around #20 is, that Spurs get Tobias Harris. (no workout reported though).

  18. #218
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    300
    Bertans is also going to Spurs on DraftXpress latest board - wouldn't suprise me as short of the unexpected falling into your lap or a trade there is probably not a NBA ready contributor at 29 - my only concern with him is having the athletic ability to at least be an average defender - but a pure shooter some have compared to a bigger Peja

  19. #219
    Bruce Almighty Bruno's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    19,194
    definitely looks as if Spurs at least plan to use their picks. some of the invited players are likely out of their draft range (Vucevuc, Shumpert), or even definitely out of their range (Morris, Kanter interview).
    that might be an indication that they try to move up and/or acquire another 1st round pick. the #18,#19 and #20 pick are or might be on the market (#20 pick from the Wolves definitely is).
    if Vucevic is their target, as many here guess, a pick in that range won't be good enough IMO. he is ranked around 20 in most mocks, but I'm pretty sure he will be picked around 10. he just is to talented and offers to much size to pass. and the success of players like Lopez and Monroe will encourage teams to invest a high pick in such a player. I can see him go to Bobcats at #9 for example.

    my hope for a pick around #20 is, that Spurs get Tobias Harris. (no workout reported though).
    I'm skeptical about rumors on Vucevic being Spurs choice. Spurs are one of the better team in the NBA at keeping it secret. While it's fully possible that Spurs are high on Vucevic, I doubt it would have been leaked to medias that soon before the draft.

    Tobias Harris has spend some time in SA working on his game with Gervin. Even without a workout, they should have some input about him.

  20. #220
    Veteran AFBlue's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Post Count
    10,868
    Saw this in an ESPN Insider article from Chad Ford...

    USC big man Nikola Vucevic continues to impress NBA teams with some excellent workouts, including a standout session with the San Antonio Spurs. It sounds as if Vucevic is seriously in the picture as early at the 16th pick to Philadelphia, and he probably won't slide past the Spurs.
    http://insider.espn.go.com/nba/blog?...aft&id=6622187

  21. #221
    Body Of Work Mr. Body's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    29,455
    Vucevic will be long gone by the Spurs' draft.

  22. #222
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    9,195
    I could see us trading Hill or Blair to the Pacers for their 15th draft pick...but then I realy don't know who would we be targeting at mid level?

    I like Vucevic but do you all think he could be on the floor the same time with Splitter? Also if we do trade up I don't want to give up our 29th pick cause I love Darrius Morris who I think is someone who can really help us out on offense and also be a lock down defender.

  23. #223
    "The ball don't lie." dbestpro's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Post Count
    10,459
    I could see us trading Hill or Blair to the Pacers for their 15th draft pick...but then I realy don't know who would we be targeting at mid level?

    I like Vucevic but do you all think he could be on the floor the same time with Splitter? .
    Vucevic will not take Splitter's minutes, but could take Bonner's.

  24. #224
    The Great Unknown yavozerb's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Post Count
    4,176
    I cannot imagine the spurs moving up in this draft simply because the players are not worth it..There is very little seperation after the top 15 and you probably make an arguement after the top 10. I could possibly even see the spurs move back and get an early 2nd rd pick if none of there players are still on the board at #29..

  25. #225
    real fans go bald mountainballer's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Post Count
    3,238
    I cannot imagine the spurs moving up in this draft simply because the players are not worth it..There is very little seperation after the top 15 and you probably make an arguement after the top 10. I could possibly even see the spurs move back and get an early 2nd rd pick if none of there players are still on the board at #29..
    you are right, but the speculation was that because of this facts, 1st round picks might be less costly than in other years. especially teams with multiple picks might be offering their additional picks (Wolves are), b/c they don't want to pick multiple players from a weak draft class.
    #12 from the Jazz might be on the market. we could make a point that #12 this year isn't better than #20 in other drafts. but what if because of this the #12 could be had for a price usually payed for a #20 pick?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •