Reply With Quote
How can anyone be a complete failure at understanding something nobody even knows what you're referring to?
If that makes you feel better about your complete failure to understand a simple thesis on a message board, have at it.
Bro.
How can anyone be a complete failure at understanding something nobody even knows what you're referring to?
Man, words are hard for you.
Bro.
Now your all butthurt over the word "Bro"? Or is this your attempt to redirect the subject now that you've been cornered?
lol cornered
Now your all butthurt over the word "Bro"? Or is this your attempt to redirect the subject now that you've been cornered?
No, bro, I said Uriel's point is quite plainly stated. We've reached an impasse because you can't find it and I'm not going to hold your hand.
I definitely have the power to break this impasse, but it has become quite clear you don't. I think that's pretty cool, bro. I'll just keep gloating.
60,000 posts...
59,975 posts consisted of;
"tell us how many widgets exactly"
" be specific"
59,975 times...lurking until someone misquotes something....someone states an opinion...someone tries to make a point....
then he sees his chance and tries to poke holes....
Trolling at its finest.
Sorry you didn't get it either.
It's cool that you both tried once before deciding to just pout and whine about how mean I am.
The TJ-Dumper feud is an entertaining sideshow on ST lately
lmao @ thread derailment factor
Okay, you have fun rejoicing in your own conceptual "victory", bro.
I don't consider it a victory, bro.
I do consider your whining to be very funny.
Well if Chumpdumper would just clarify himself already, this thread wouldn't be an extra 3 pages long.
Well, all you had to do was read Uriel's posts again, bro.Well if Chumpdumper would have just clarified himself when asked, this thread wouldn't be an extra 3 pages long.
I did read all 20+ paragraphs of various popsucking and bonnerloving and I gotta tell ya, when I got through I needed to go get a nice stiff drink. Still have no clue which point you are babbling about, and I think its hilarious that whatever little nugget of bs your clinging to, you think its obvious to everyone but me. Haven't seen anyone else chime in with the goods, have you? Why don't you just break the suspense and tell us all before this goes to 10 pages.Well, all you had to do was read Uriel's posts again, bro.
I believe you when you say you still don't have a clue, bro.I did read all 20+ paragraphs of various popsucking and bonnerloving and I gotta tell ya, when I got through I needed to go get a nice stiff drink. Still have no clue which point you are babbling about, and I think its hilarious that whatever little nugget of bs your clinging to, you think its obvious to everyone but me. Haven't seen anyone else chime in with the goods, have you? Why don't you just break the suspense and tell us all before this goes to 10 pages.
You are wasting your time...I did read all 20+ paragraphs of various popsucking and bonnerloving and I gotta tell ya, when I got through I needed to go get a nice stiff drink. Still have no clue which point you are babbling about, and I think its hilarious that whatever little nugget of bs your clinging to, you think its obvious to everyone but me. Haven't seen anyone else chime in with the goods, have you? Why don't you just break the suspense and tell us all before this goes to 10 pages.
dumpster gets his kicks from trolling...
Keep up the suspense, bro. And the childish snide remarks. You can help make this 10 pages and pad your post count in the process!
So why do you spend time reading and responding to my posts?
Chump and TJ take this thread to 5 pages: fact or fiction?
Have to give tjastal credit. Even though hes the "Ian Mahimni" of ST, he still tries anyway to be relavent.
Relevant you mean?
Anyhow, I do appreciate the compliment. Clowning Chumpdumper has become something of a little hobby of mine.
Chump is winning here because he took TJ out of his M.O. which is to call anyone who disagrees with him a "Popsucker" or a "Bonnerlover" whether it is appropriate or not.
Chump's M.O. is to pretend he understands the issue on a deeper level than the person he is arguing with and to ridicule his opponent because they don't "get it" when there is nothing to get. Chump is still in his M.O.
Therefore, Chumper wins.
Next!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
