Reply With Quote
Eh, there's nothing to win; and there's plenty to get. Anyone who isn't stupid or blinded by hate could figure out what the thesis is.
No kidding. Those two should just stop bickering and get a room already.
Eh, there's nothing to win; and there's plenty to get. Anyone who isn't stupid or blinded by hate could figure out what the thesis is.
But it's not a deeper understanding -- merely a basic understanding of what was explicitly stated in the posts.
I know.
I wouldn't count him as my staunchest ally, bro.
I do give him credit for being literate, though.
lol @ backtracking
lol @ no "staunch" allies backing you up
lol @ this argument
What backtracking?
We're still talking about your inability to understand he rather simple thesis that was explicitly stated in Uriel's posts.
Do you not understand that either?
Wow, bro.
I wasn't really siding with Chump there, buddy. You are kind of making his case for him though.
He seems a little paranoid tbh.
The Spurs ran into injuries to star players during a critical time in the season. Had Dirk gone down a week before the playoffs, the Mavs would be facing the same thing. The Bulls had a great regular season, were they fool's gold?
It's always been about matchups, and the Spurs do not match up well with Memphis, a team who had one fewer win since January than the Spurs. Then again, they were destroyed by the Lakers and the Heat in a couple of games.
There's no such as a 61 game fool's gold. If there were, teams like the Clippers would do it every year. They aren't interested in winning a ring, but they would love to be in the playoffs. Teams like the Knicks who have sold the farm for a chance at a ring would at least get a 61 win season to justify their move. , any other team in the league would win as many as they could in the regular season. There's no "Win 61 Games But Lose in the Playoffs" scheme. It's naive to think otherwise.
The absence of any of your "staunch allies" is backtracking by default. And so here we still sit, waiting for you to reveal the mystery that is kept hidden with lock and key.
congrats on ohmwrecker's newfound literacy, btw
Waiting on you, bro.
Huh? You said he was one. Are you backtracking on that, bro? I don't even I could really call any poster one, but I don't dwell on such things.
It's there, bro. Do you know what "explicitly spelled out" means?And so here we still sit, waiting for you to reveal the mystery that is kept hidden with lock and key.
He always seemed that way to me, bro -- even when we disagree.congrats on ohmwrecker's newfound literacy, btw
For what, bro?Waiting on you, bro.
How are my past posts illiterate?
Please explain in detail.
I said what? LMAO You claimed yourself he wasn't one of your "staunch" allies inferring only they would understand your POV. Again, I see nobody attempting to the crack the hidden code you claim is so obvious. Now you seem to be getting a little testy here, bro. Maybe we should just call it even and drop the subject, huh? (pssst.. Here's your chance to escape!)
Now look what you gone and did, Chump. Poor Ohm's all confused.
I did no such thing, bro -- I said anyone who isn't an stupid or blinded by hate could understand such a plainly stated thesis. And you misused the word inferring. Words really are hard for you.That's just it, bro -- it isn't hidden.Again, I see nobody attempting to the crack the hidden code you claim is so obvious.If you want to quit and run away, no one is stopping you, bro.Now you seem to be getting a little testy here, bro. Maybe we should just call it even and drop the subject, huh? (pssst.. Here's your chance to escape!)
I'm not the one who gets flustered in arguments, misspells words and uses poor grammar, tbh.Now look what you gone and did, Chump. Poor Ohm's all confused.
Okay, fine, I misinterprented your "he's not my staunchest ally" comment.
Still, where all all these non-stupid and not blinded people (who are obviously smarter than the "literate" ohmwrecker) you claim should understand such a plainly stated thesis?
Going for 6 pages with the cat & mouse I see..
I see the OP is in the past now. Does every thread turn into the same cliques getting into bickering contests? Reminds me of kids in the back seat annoying each other and getting corrected by the parents after one of them complains about being touched.
Poor Ohmwrecker now has an inferiority complex because of what you said bro...
How many more people do you think you can you insult in this thread?
-- and mistook implication for inference -- don't forget that, bro.
To say nothing of the misquoting.
Why are they suddenly required to claim whether they spotted the thesis, bro? They could just as easily be laughing at your failure to grasp it as I am and just as loathe to hold your hand to point it out to you.Still, where all all these non-stupid and not blinded people (who are obviously smarter than the "literate" ohmwrecker) you claim should understand such a plainly stated thesis?
As far as the OP is concerned, I never put much literal stock in what is publicly said by players or coaches. The Spurs failed this season and will make changes.
Uh, bro.
Damn near 6 pages and not one has surfaced. Must be a lot of laughing and holding back typing out responses. But you take care in the knowledge that all your staunch allies..errr...non-stupid non-blind people.. are all sitting there partaking in the laughter if it makes you feel better.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
