This.
It shows dominance. Consistency is cool and all but lets not confuse consistency with dominance. The Spurs never dominated a sustained period of time with a minimal back to back.
Spurs fan will argue this knowing very well that if they indeed did win one back to back they would use that shtick and defend it as to why you need to defend at least one. They never did hence why they argue that back to backs are overrated.


Reply With Quote

