Reply With Quote
now you believe scientists lol
Probably not, but you never know...
Scientists are now confirming that the suns current reduction in sunspot activity, and prediction lack of sunspots during the next cycle, will cause global cooling. Some have talked of a mini ice age.
Don't believe me, you all know how to google.
Here is just one anyway:
Not by Fire but by Ice - THE NEXT ICE AGE - NOW!
now you believe scientists lol
What the , here are a few more:
Earth may be headed into a mini Ice Age within a decade
The mini ice age starts here
Researchers Crack the Mystery of the Missing Sunspots
Solar Wind Loses Power, Hits 50-year Low
Don't forget these:
Solar Global Warming
The Next Ice Age
Sun Spots
Black Carbon Global Warming
Yes, these are scientists. Not climatologists.
have you seen the day after tomorrow? this will only affect everyone not in texas.
LOL...
What a fake ass show.
Yeah WC it's really freakin hot now...stop rubbing it in.
For posterity.
That's pretty cool.
Scientists see sunspot "hibernation" but no Ice Age
I shudder to think what would happen were I to bother clicking on the links you provide and what the "scientists" in the articles actually say.They had no answer as to whether this might be true, and said nothing about whether the Maunder Minimum -- named for astronomer E.H. Maunder -- was related to a long cold period in Europe and other parts of the Northern Hemisphere known as the Little Ice Age.
How strong a connection is there between a Little Ice Age and a Maunder Minimum? "Not as strong a connection as people would like to believe," Hill said by phone.
"The Little Ice Age actually lasted for hundreds of years, of which the Maunder Minimum was only a small segment ... My personal opinion is that there is only an anecdotal connection without a whole lot of scientific background behind it."
Several websites and blogs have argued that the potentially cooling influence of a lower level of sunspot activity could cancel out the warming caused by human activities that generate climate-warming greenhouse gases. Hill disputed this.
"In my opinion, it is a huge leap ... to an abrupt global cooling, since the connections between solar activity and climate are still very poorly understood," he said in an e-mail.
Not going to hold my breath waiting on your confirmation bias' predisposed belief system to pan out, sorry.
I knew yahoo was always more credible than NASA.
No problem. AGW will save us.
This is a clip of Will talking to a reporter about the issue.
And Corbyn from the UK
And Will's statement before Congress in 2003:
http://epw.senate.gov/108th/Soon_072903.htm
Last edited by Agloco; 06-16-2011 at 05:12 PM.
???
Fail.
"Hill" = one of the scientists studying the phenomenon, not "yahoo".
As for NASA, why don't you point me to what "NASA" says on the subject by pointing to one of the links here in this thread?
(hint: "NASA" didn't say anything about this)
(shrugs)
Do you always talk out your ass or was it just this time?
2012
I guess NASA.gov was hacked. <shrugs>
Sorry, Professor Lambeau.
Plus we're talking links here, so......
So the suns decreasing output is whats causing the warming even though the output is on its way down.
BTW the forcing from this reduction is likely WAY less than the forcing applied by CO2 and other GH gases. AGW is like a freight train and this isn't enough to stop it, unfortunetly.
More proof that WC is simpleminded. He can only understand duality and anything of further complexities he just ignores.
Try to tell the alarmists things like this.Third, there is no convincing evidence from each of the individual climate proxies to suggest that higher temperatures occurred in the 20th century than in the Medieval Warm Period. Nor is there any convincing evidence to suggest that either the rate of increase or the duration of warming during the 20th century were greater than in the Medieval Warm Period.
I would welcome global cooling.
Don't get all pissy because you can't put a coherent thought together. It's not my fault.
If you want to be understood, put *some* effort into it.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
