Comparing the 2007 Spurs championship to the 2011 Mavs championship is stupid. If Manu doesn't commit the stupidest foul in the history of playoff basketball, we beat them in 2006, and there's no precedent for them being able to beat us in a 7 game series. The terrible 2010 Spurs still kicked the 2010 Mavs ass, because Hill is the perfect defensive player against Jason Kidd. While the 2011 Mavs were obviously alot better than the 2010 version, so were the 2011 Spurs versus the 2010 Spurs.
2007 Mavs were a flawed team, great in the regular season with amazing offense, but nothing more than a middle of the pack defense. The 2011 Spurs, with Duncan on the floor, were a top 5 defense all season long (they were 3rd at some point late in the season).
The two biggest mistakes that the 2011 Spurs made were we stopped playing fast and we stopped starting Blair. We started slowing it down plus starting Dice, and it killed RJ and Blair's production and Duncan couldn't pick up the slack.

Reply With Quote
yep, and as it has been mentioned in here already...the Mavs can say the exact same thing from 2007. The Warriors were the only team that could beat the Mavs. Dallas would have destroyed any other team in the playoffs from either conference.
