I agree. I was strictly speaking of trading Hill to get into the lottery to take Thompson.
I wouldn't trade Hill for Thompson. If you're trading Hill, get a big or a point guard.
I agree. I was strictly speaking of trading Hill to get into the lottery to take Thompson.
Hill for #10 is a steal for the Spurs. Very doubtful it could happen.
Yes...Yes........Yes.....
The Spurs FO is much too shrewd to show their hands. These Thompson rumors are nothing but a smokescreen. I just hope Bismack is their preferred target.
Those are actually the EXACT kinds of problems that are un-fixable. We'd also be getting something for a player who doesn't fit and is caught in a logjam, as opposed to cutting someone like Green Or Butler and getting nothing.
any of this is plausible but i dunno.. if anything it's either parker or hill that won't be here next season.. as long as RJ's out.. i dont care what they do o.O
If I had to pick this draft's plummeter, it would be Biyambo. His workout in Italy was flat ing terrible. He literally could not score 1 on 0 from three feet out. THREE FEET.
Opportunity for the Spurs - or some other team - to buy low. Offense can be taught. His athletic skill, raw strength, desire and intelligence are his gifts. Those are things that cannot be taught.
+1. I'd look right to Ibaka to prove this. If I remember right, Ibaka was a straight up beast on defense, rebounding, and shot-blocking last season. And then this past season all of a sudden he had a jumpshot. The kid worked his ass off, and can play both ways now....
offense was not a problem for the spurs, defense(lowpost and perimeter) is what we need.....he can learn offense...bismack would not be a bad pickup for us
Charlotte with the #9 might be in play. The Spurs might have to kick in 29 or maybe even add salary to absorb a corpse like Matt Carroll.
Here's the article and it's portions
Bobcats open to trade offers
Hill has been a starter, can play multiple positions, is right in their age range, could be viewed as having upside and can be with them for a long time.... Higgins (President of Basketball Operations) said they've narrowed their choice to between four and six players with the ninth choice, they may not keep that selection. Higgins acknowledged they've discussed deals in which they would give up the pick to acquire a veteran.
"Obviously, a starter," Higgins said. "Probably somewhere between the 22- to 25-year-old range, where he has an upside and he can be with your team for quite a long time."
Charlotte at 9 is good spot. Enough chance someone they'd take at 5 or 7 could fall and only cost Hill, but high enough to get their plan B.
I don't know about Biyombo...I don't feel good about 6'8-6'9 guys that aren't small forwards.
No more "too short" guys, please. We need big bigs.
And as amazing of a raw talent as Ibaka was when he was drafted, word has it that his Congolese countryman, Biyombo, is even better at this stage.
Oh wow I hadnt heard that. Good stuff SenorSpur...![]()
tony p ain't going no where and g hill ain't going no where....spurs are going to be stuck witrh the same pick....just make the best of it
Were ed
Yes, at least that's what I've heard. Biyombo is farther along at this point of entering the NBA than was Ibaka. From watching clips of him in the Nike Hoops Summitt, this dude is probably better offensively, on the low block, than Ibaka was.
In fact, Biyombo has leaned heavily on Ibaka as an adviser, friend, and mentor.
Contrary to reports, he's got a nice spin move on the baseline and a nice jumphook, rolling across the lane from the left block. He's obviously got work to do on the offensive end, but with work, his offensive game should emerge.
I'll post some links to his videos in the Think Tank section. Check it out.
Maybe the Spurs started the Biyombo is 26 rummor. Maybe the Spurs know he is 18. Who knows? Im for the the best team they can make.
Trust me. With his reach (7'7' wingspan), his length and leaping ability, he WILL be a beast on the boards. Make no mistake, he's got a man body already and carves out position nicely. He'll be tough to score on.
He's not ready to play center against starting caliber bigs, but he can play PF right now.
Hill is a lot better at getting to the rim than Anderson. I read after we drafted him that Anderson doesn't have very good handles at all.
Not only has bad handles, but tends to be fat and lazy and is also undersized at the 3 where he's most likely to see alot of action.
Spurs should cut their losses and distance themselves from this turd ASAP.
I'm sure the Spurs could work wonders with the next Mahinmi.
Setting the sights a bit lower -- maybe they can just tease the minimum from a can't miss prospect like Splitter.![]()
Are you freaking kidding me? Dude do you even watch games? You over rate Hill and you underrate James Anderson. He was playing freaking great for a rookie early the season until he broke his foot. Kind of hard to stay in shape when you have a broken foot.
No, it's not that hard, really.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)