Game 6:
Parker: 10-17 FGs 4 assists 2 turnovers 1 reb 23 pts 39 minutes
Hill: 3-10 FGs 2 assists 0 turnovers 7 reb 6 pts 38 minutes
I'd say Parker outplayed Hill in the most important game of their lives.
dang that great player that said o in 2007-2008 still wasn't great enough to make an allstar team
he must have been robbed over his 9 year career huh?
Hot retort. But what I particularly liked, was Tony Parker's assist total in those finals, playing the point guard position.
Did this guy really just compare Jamaal Magloire to Tony Parker?
Fit the Spurs style nicely, huh.
Neither has Odom. Just because there are better players at your position, or more popular players, means nothing.
are you now calling Odom a great player?
you have really low standards for the term "great player"
He's a borderline great player. He's been a main cog on championship teams.
You actually kind of applied that term to Richard Jefferson. Did you catch that?
So has Tony Parker, yet your willing to trade him away.
if both Odom and RJ are "borderline great players"
Tony Parker must rank in the top 10 all time
Richard Jefferson has been far statistically superior to Odom, that's why.
Tony Parker, at one time, was a borderline great Offensive player, yes.
@ Dumpster
It's sort of like when you break it off with a girl, you might say "We parted ways". The reality is, you broke it off with her because she was a disgusting . She still wanted to be with you. Do you catch my drift? In this scenario, you would be Derek Fisher, and the is the Lakers.
So you're still wrong.
You will never win.
I won by default since you started out being wrong.
The Lakers and Fisher parted ways.
You will always be wrong.
No. Fisher parted ways with the Lakers. The Lakers are the .
If A parts ways with B, B parts ways with A.
They had ways.
They parted.
Descent troll thread. 7/10
Valiant effort. But no.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
