Reply With Quote
What have I said thats hateful
Yeah, it's not a choice IIRC the s believe it's nature not choice so what else would it be if not genetic.
If it's genetic than that's how it propogates in the gene pool, fat people eat when they are not hungry s other genders when they are not attracted to them. Both unnecessary.And lol reintroducing the need not to procreate through procreation.
What have I said thats hateful
I'm asking what you believe.
By procreation. Turns out they always had a need to procreate just like heterosexuals ever since they have been around.If it's genetic than that's how it propogates in the gene pool
i can feel the families being torn apart.
like straight people have been doing a great job preserving marriages and their sanc y on their own.
the dynamic of my family doesn't stand a chance against this gay onslaught.
pretty soon we'll all be wearing belly shirts.
There is a precedant for sexduality to be caused genetically but not in the sense that it is passed down. It is likely a condition of overcrowding and other environmental conditions. I forget the study but it was found that if there were several male children, each one down the line is more likely to be sexual than the older siblings. Also, I remember seeing somewhere that sexual children are far more likely to be born in cities or areas with dense populations which support that hypothesis.
It is not, however, a gene that can be passed down.
Who gives a if a man just decides he likes butt sex or if he is trended towards it by some RNA sequence in the human genome? The only notion that its bad with overarching authority comes from the church.
the church involving itself in government.
classic
I wonder when god is gonna unleash his wrath on New York. He must be really in pissed to see all those gots getting married. I'm surprised the Empire State Building is still standing.
obviously he let 9/11 happen as a preemptive strike
Now that you bring that up, that's a theory I could see Pat Robertson being serious about.
You mean it wasn't the terrerists? We could've saved a boatload of money if we knew that.
God was using the terrorists to carry out his plot against those got lovers in New York.
Long live the confederacy!
Good for them. About time.
It was a strike against..........wait for it........this just came to me..........
ok it was a strike against a shist regime
What pisses me off is that most of these evangelists want to hold society to a standard that they themselves don't live up to. A lot of hypocrisy.
For example, they want to outlaw gay marriage because sexuality is shunned in certain passages of the Bible, but it certain passages sex before marriage is also shunned. You don't see them trying to turn the latter into policy though because it would apply to them. Hypocritical bull .
The archbishop also made a strong statement against NY's equal marriage law, but didn't have much of an issue at all with the non-mutual sexual relationships priests had with alter boys.
they didn't marry the altar boys.
You missed the point. Everyone understands that the two aren't the same. No, the priests didn't marry them. They sexually assaulted and/or sodomized them, yet the church has less of a problem with that, continuing to play the dirty priest s game.
yes i completely missed the point
Technically that's now possible in New York, but why dwell on that?
To piss off Catholics too? Or to prove what a dirty mind you have?
Oh, wait, you can do both at the same time. nm.
A rather lame one I thought, but you sure seem to be proud of it.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
