I usually don't hammer people this hard, unless they start talking like you. So here goes, dumb . Let's talk about what the "real fans" remember.
I remember that the Spurs got their asses kicked by LA, so Pop decided to try McDyess in the starting lineup. (I'm guessing that he recognized that they would have a problem in that area, come playoff time, and he wanted to have some time to get the new lineup used to playing together.) I remember that after McDyess was put into the starting lineup, the Spurs won 6 of their next 7 games. Do you remember that?
Then I remember that Duncan got hurt, and the Spurs lost their next 6 in a row. (Two of those losses after Duncan returned, but at less than 100%.) And in three of those losses, with McDyess starting, the Spurs scored 112, 104, and 114. Those losses had nothing to do with McDyess vs. Blair, and everything to do with Duncan being injured. Did you remember that?
Then the Spurs had 4 wins in a row, with McDyess starting. And in those games, the Spurs scored 114, 97, 124, and 111. Doesn't sound like having McDyess in the starting lineup slowed their scoring down too badly, does it? Did you remember that?
Then came the last 2 games of the season, and the Spurs didn't give a damn if they won or not. Pop held Duncan out of the first one (against the Lakers) and Ginobili only played about 2 minutes against Phoenix. Those games meant nothing. But... McDyess didn't start against the Lakers, and the Spurs scored 93. McDyess did start against Phoenix, and the Spurs scored 103.
Take out the 6 games after Duncan went down, and the Spurs won 10 out of 11 with McDyess starting. And they scored over 100 points in 8 of those 11 games. Remember that?
Your theory is .
It didn't happen.
And you're wrong.
Again.

flapjackchef getting on.
Reply With Quote


