LOL...
Do you think CO and fires = GW?
Antarctica awaits you.
![]()
LOL...
Do you think CO and fires = GW?
Only people can prevent forest fires.
why would CO be any different?
how re ed does one have to be to not admit we are polluting our atmosphere?
I'm a bit surprised that Manny is starting to fall for this BS.
I'm not falling for anything, but ok. I'm open to the possibility that if it shows up over the coming years. We'll see.
Oh, pooh! What is a consensus of scientist to do when you have people
like this.
Is Britain about to be plunged into a Little Ice Age?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencete...e-Age-way.html
![]()
Socialism is good. The US has forms of socialism, it doesn't work any other way. Greed kills a complete capitalistic society where the few will hoard up all the assets.
Isn't it funny how we have been saying the AGW scare is a farce, and the alarmists were always so condescending, and talking about consensus, and what-not.
Why are they so quiet now?
How long have I been saying that the Sun and soot are the major causes of warming, not CO2?
"How is taking trillions of dollars in wealth and giving it to vested parties like Al Gore"
nobody's doing that strawman, so STFU
lol
I love how people on the internet pretend to know science.
I do know science, far better than the average person.
If that's true then how, in any possible way, does that article reenforce your view on GW/ AGW?
It doesn't.
Climate is always changing.
Most of the recent extreme weather is directly related to the 2nd strongest La Nina on record. La Nina is gone and it's effects on the atmosphere continue to weaken. The models predict a normal fall/winter.
Even if we continue with strong La Nina/El Nino cycles there is no scientific evidence linking La Nina/El Nino cycles to global warming. I think you already know this though???
Truth doesn't matter to the indoctrinated.
"2nd strongest La Nina on record"
always skating away with short term events.
Last edited by boutons_deux; 07-04-2011 at 05:58 PM.
Because it is upon those that long term trends are built.
La Nina/El Nino don't operate independently of global conditions, warming or cooling.
To claim that the strongest La Nina on record, and NOT global warming, is a cause of extreme weather events is silly.
We'll just have to wait and see. It was a fairly abnormal year by anyone's standards and the La Nina wasn't any different from the 1970 and 1973 and only stronger than 1988. There's a lot of short term climate factors such a the NAO and PDO in addition to ENSO that can be used to explain why the weather is occurring. What I want to see is that if these patterns are changing on such a basis to where the situations that are conducive to extreme weather are becoming more prevalent. We'll tell over time but the past year has been quite extraordinary.
Also be careful when you say linked directly to ENSO. The reality is that statement is no different than saying a strong hurricane is directly due to climate change. You can't attribute any specific weather feature to a climate condition directly.
There is evidence that climate change is affecting some of these large oscillations as I have posted it prior as an effort to explain how AGW can cause colder winters in places. Its hard to imagine that ENSO is immune to rising global temps although its very difficult to say how it has been or how it will be affected.
I think you two need to have a talk over a few beers.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)