Reply With Quote
I guess it just sucks when the perp is obvious, but you just can't prove it with 100% certainty.
Oh well.
The jurors should demand payment and legitimate news organizations should refuse to pay so they can keep their journalistic credibility. The story dies and everyone wins.
I guess it just sucks when the perp is obvious, but you just can't prove it with 100% certainty.
Oh well.
pretty much.I guess it just sucks when the perp is obvious, but you just can't prove it with 100% certainty.
Oh well.
The suckers are talking now....
Russell Huekler, one of five alternate jurors who were present for all the testimony and sequestered along with the 12 other jurors, said today that he would have delivered the same verdict and that he was shocked by the public outrage over the trial's outcome.
"The first number of witnesses were Casey's friend and every time that they said they saw Casey with Caylee, it was a loving relationship and no one provided evidence to the contrary," Huekler said.
Huekler said the lack of physical evidence that Caylee was murdered overwhelmed the cir stantial evidence of Casey Anthony's many lies and her hard partying in the 31 days when she knew her daughter was dead but didn't tell authorities.
a "loving mother" whose daughter is *missing* but not only fails to tell the police, she blocks the police and anyone elses attempt (friends, brother) to find the girl. And parties on. What a "loving relationship."
"Yeah, the behavior was bizarre, but what I took from that is that the family was very dysfunctional. Because they were so dysfunctional, that was the norm for them. Casey didn't just start lying for the first 31 days [after Caylee disappeared]. She had been lying for the past two years...I felt it was the norm for her," Huekler said.
PT Barnams dream come true these jurors.
My wife got her 6 dollar check in the mail for her day of Jury duty (they specifically told them that the money is only to compensate them for the cost of lunch. They give bus passes in leiu of paying extra for parking.
I didn't follow the case, but from why is being said in this thread, it seems like this is an instance of the system performing in exactly the manner that it should, but not providing the feel good outcome.I guess it just sucks when the perp is obvious, but you just can't prove it with 100% certainty.
Oh well.
(much like freedom of speech/westboro)
So if I have this correct from most of you then all I have to do if I am tired of changing diapers or want to be in a child free home I can just find a garbage bag some duck tape and a nice warm spot in the woods to bury my child.
Then I get to party all month long as I lie to the cops with fake jobs,made up nanny's, and mix in a few drowning confessions toss in my father molested me watch my story unfold in the national news , grab a few movie / book offers, and then live the rest of my life a rich famous child free asshole?
how is that Justice?
edit: screw it. I am uninformed on this case, so I am rescinding my comments. By choice, I have no idea if the prosecution did their job or not. I don't care about any trial that doesn't effect me. Mea Culpa.
now juror 3 says she didn't want to find her not guilty, wtf? Dumb ing jurors
you never know till you try
I didn't pay extensive attention to this case because I'm not a massive got that only sucks on the stories that major media outlets report, but from what I've heard from reasonable people, it sounds like the girl was guilty but the police and prosecutors jumped right into charging her instead of taking the time to gather evidence and build a legitimate case.
It happens. But it's pretty ing sad that everybody knows about this horse story but would have no idea what I'm talking about if I were to mention the Houston mass murders. Now THAT is some ed up .
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
