Reply With Quote
Classic Parker homer too dense to even remember what he said 5 minutes ago.
1. I don't want to rebuild or trade Tony ParkerParker homers ... gotta be the most re ed dip s on this forum.
Let's see, they all whine about wanting to rebuild and pay lip service to putting TP on the trading block, but scoff at my idea which would shave off 2 years of salary for a total savings of 35 MILLION. OH, and also would net us a 24 year old power forward for the future to start next to Tiago.
Not good enough, says the Parker homers.
2. Jameer Nelson and Ryan ing Anderson aren't going to better our chances next season.
3. Ryan Anderson starting Power forward of the Future? lmao Can't wait for the day Duncan retires so Ryan Anderson can take over the reigns.
Lets rebuild... trade Tony Parker for Ryan Anderson,at trashing our FO....
Go play with the trade machine some more, and figure out some more ways we can get rid of that damn frenchy, I doubt it can get any worse then this idea.
Classic Parker homer too dense to even remember what he said 5 minutes ago.
IF YOU were talking about rebuilding for the future than so be it, Trade Tony for younger pieces and nobody could really disagree with you, but insinuating that trading Tony would be a "win now" move is
Good try dip .
Classic Parker homer too dense to even remember what he said 5 minutes ago.
So now you don't want to rebuild for the future (?) I understand that you wouldn't trade your precious poodle for anyone but why are you against rebuilding?
Good try dip .
The dude just never shuts up.
lol Tony Parker for Ryan Anderson
lol Ryan Anderson is better than any PF on the spurs currently
lol
lol cut 2 years of parker's bloated salary and save 35 million by paying Nelson half price
lol
lol
lol
lol
Not Parker homers. More like common sense homers.Parker homers ... gotta be the most re ed dip s on this forum.
Let's see, they all whine about wanting to rebuild and pay lip service to putting TP on the trading block, but scoff at my idea which would shave off 2 years of salary for a total savings of 35 MILLION. OH, and also would net us a 24 year old power forward for the future to start next to Tiago.
Not good enough, says the Parker homers.
Because I feel that keeping the big 3 intact give us the best chance to win right now, and as long as Duncan is taking the court, I think he deserves that.... is this that hard to understand...
I know that Ryan Anderson isn't going to turn us into a le contender right now and if you are indeed doing this trade for life after Duncan, I think it's pretty ty value to get in return for a player like Tony.
Not really.To what end? Tanking for a lottery pick?
lol
lol cut 2 years of parker's bloated salary and save 35 million by paying Nelson half pricelol so sensitivelol
lol
lol
lol
lol Blair & Bonner > Anderson
lol
lol
lol doesn't understand what rebuilding is
lol
lol
Oh, btw lol
lol
lol
/thread.
defeated.
Right, because common sense dictates spending 35 million extra dollars is exactly what you wanna do when you start rebuilding.
OK, so you do want to tank.
It makes sense now.
Not what I would personally do, but it is a strategy of sorts.
When you rebuild you sort of have to accept the fact you might be bad for awhile.
And I don't agree the spurs wouldn't have a shot with Nelson at point. He's not far behind Parker as far as point guards go. And he'll be getting paid half Parker's salary and his two years meshes better with Manu & Timmy's departure and the whole rebuilding plan, not to mention saving Holt two additional years of 12m+. Not to mention getting a 24 year old who is already seasoned in the league.
Any of this make sense?
/Parker homers
/lololololol
but, Nelson is far behind Parker.. especially in this system. With Pop and Team Chemistry issues you are virtually giving up on the last years of Duncan.
I'm not interested in doing that.
I said there is a certain logic to your wanting to tank so badly. It's not the first time that strategy has been proposed. Tanking for Ryan Anderson is pretty lol though tbh.
Rebuilding is not tanking. I have not suggested tanking. I know the two are probably confusing terms and all but please try to commit this to memory for at least the rest of the day or until I log off.
Just because you don't realize you proposed tanking doesn't mean you didn't propose tanking.
So you would be willing to commit/spend 35 extra million of Holt's limited pool of dollars in order to give it one last go around with the poodle but this time no starting PF and possibly both draft pick rookies playing major roles on the team?
Now that's some real faith right there, baby!
I love how fans are so concerned with shaving money off the cap, when rebuilding through the draft is the only real way the Spurs can rebuild.
Even if Spurs saved money off Jefferson or Parker coming off the books in proposed trades, no free agent would want to come here in the next few years- meaning Spurs would have to overpay for marginal talent ( like a Jefferson), just like they're paying now.
Some people really need to get a clue.
So you would be willing to commit/spend 35 extra million of Holt's limited pool of dollars in order to give it one last go around with the poodle but this time no starting PF and possibly both draft pick rookies playing major roles on the team?
Now that's some real faith right there, baby!
Also, just because we commit to Tony for 1 or 2 more seasons doesn't automatically mean we commit to his whole contract. If our best interest is to get rid of him or trade him after Duncan retires, than that will be an option... especially since only $3.5/million out of his $12.5 is guaranteed to him during the last year of his contract. So saying you're shedding $35 million doesn't necessarily make sense
?
Tanking is purposeful losing. Rebuilding = trying but losing. And accepting the fact you're going to lose. Or in your case not accepting the fact that you're going to suck for awhile & calling it "tanking".
Bingo.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions