Reply With Quote
so not a single TD came from him out-reaching a DB?
no, actually, this goes back to your inability to comprehend/see the effect Brady and BB have on a WR stats and perceived ability.
when Brady got sick of Moss, Moss's inflated stats ended abruptly, his ability was still just on a slow decline
so not a single TD came from him out-reaching a DB?
I thought his ability declined rapidly from 2007 to 2009? It then slowed from 2009 to 2010?
The truth is, Moss's ability is still there, his character is what ended his career. It got him kicked outa New England, and it got him retired because he wouldn't accept a deal where he had to earn his money.
backpedaling. I thought height was the big reason why he scored 13 TDs in 2009. Now all you're saying is his height led to at least one TD?
And watching that highlight video, I don't see his height being the main contributor to one single TD. His speed and ability to get separation is obvious a MUCH bigger asset to his playing style.
no, I'm just asking. how many were there? you posted the vid, watch it and count for me, youtube vids aren't playing for me right now
I'm serious when I say that video shows his speed created WAY more TDs for him than his height did in 2009. Moss has never been a physical receiver who can use his height to win jump balls.
first TD = CB guarding against the fade/jump ball, moss pushes to the inside, smaller moss doesn't get this TD
2nd TD = Flea Flicker,
3rd TD = broken play, all tom brady
4th = big body shields off defender for the outside shoulder pass, QBs don't usually throw that pass to smaller WRs, Malcolm Floyd makes this play, and makes it prettier
5th = slant, big body big arms lead to broken tackle for TD
6th = play puts him against safety alone, size allows him to shield off defender and go up and get ball
7th = typical Pats route scheme gets him open, pass has to be high to keep away from underneath defender, short moss doesn't get the TD here
8th = another typical pats unstoppable short yardage play, though revis is probably up in the face of a smaller WR here, rather than worried about the fade.
9th = prefect throw and bad D
10th = all height
11th &12th = Scheme/Bad D/wide open
13th = good play, brady had time to throw to the double move.
most of the TDs here = result of Pats offense, size played a role almost half, Malcolm Floyd would have made all of these plays as well
neat, part 5 of Vander's re ed ass saying Malcolm Floyd = Randy Moss
I get baited into it, also it's not really about Floyd, I just threw his name out there as example and they ran with it.neat, part 5 of Vander's re ed ass saying Malcolm Floyd = Randy Moss
AFC:
East: Patriots
North: Steelers
South: Colts
West: Chargers
WC: Ravens, Bills
AFCCG: Bills over Steelers
NFC:
East: Eagles
North: Packers
South: Saints
West: Cardinals
WC: Falcons, Giants
NFCCG: Packers over Saints (in one of the best/funnest games ever)
SB: Bills over Packers.
SBMVP: Ryan Fitzpatrick
Now to get back on track after a bit of a derailment of a predictions thread..
AFC:
East: Jets
North: Ravens
South: Texans
West: Chargers
WC: Pats, Colts
AFCCG: Jets over Pats
NFC:
East: Eagles
North: Packers
South: Falcons
West: Rams
WC: Lions, Saints
NFCCG: Packers over Falcons
SB: Jets over Packers
SBMVP: Revis
Lol people here still picking the rams. Cards is a more complete team and has the weakest schedule out of all the 32 teams this season.
I agree the Cards are the more complete team but I am not a Kolb fan and being new to the system I think they are going to struggle to start off. I may be completely wrong of course but that is why it is a "prediction". I think the Rams could go 9-7 this year and win the division.
NFC
North
Green Bay
Chicago (wild card)
South
New Orleans
Atlanta (wild card)
East
Philadelphia
West
St Louis
------------
AFC
North
Baltimore
Steelers (wild card)
South
Indianapolis
East
New England
West
Kansas City
San Diego (wild card)
-------------------
PLAYOFFS
NFC championship game
Green Bay over Philadelphia
AFC championship game
Patriots over Chiefs
-------------------
Super Bowl
Packers over Patriots
CHEESE and the TROPHY goes again to the best QB in the NFL today....Aaron Rodgers and his defense.
RAMS elite in 2013!
lol Cards fan making fun of the 49ers
NFC
Green Bay (detroit WC)
Atlanta (new orleans WC)
Philly
Rams
AFC
Steelers (Baltimore WC)
Indy
New England (Jets WC)
Chiefs
SB Pack>Indy
Packers may be able to pull off a NE type run here in the next 5 years, IMO
I wouldn't be talking about one of the other 31 teams that knows Max Hall doesn't belong on an NFL roster when you support your team having him.
AFC
South - Indy
West- KC
North - Baltimore
East - Jets
WC - NE and Jacksonville (MJD healthy, the Glitter Kitties go HAM beating out SD and the Houston 8-8's for the last wild card)
AFCCG - Indy over Jets
NFC
South - ATL
West - 49ers
North - GB
East - Eagles
WC - NO and Chicago
NFCCG - Packers over Eagles
SB - Indy over Packers
He's got swag and moxie.I wouldn't be talking about one of the other 31 teams that knows Max Hall doesn't belong on an NFL roster when you support your team having him.
lol whisenhunt
Why the is Max Hall still on the roster, Skelton is more than enough to fill the "longshot dark horse young 3rd string QB" role. IMO they should sign a veteran or some to fill the backup role, that'll be enough at QB. Heck I'd even take DA as the backup over what the have now.
I also hope they're joking when they say they're "fine" with what they have at WR. Unless Stephen Williams is getting good a lot quicker expected, they don't have any semblance of a 2nd receiver.
If they got the 2nd receiver and the left tackle position cleared up
NFC West = f
Hall and not a vet is still there because the FO is saving money. They have to extend Fitz, shore up the Oline, get a #2 WR and build up a LB corps.lol whisenhunt
Why the is Max Hall still on the roster, Skelton is more than enough to fill the "longshot dark horse young 3rd string QB" role. IMO they should sign a veteran or some to fill the backup role, that'll be enough at QB. Heck I'd even take DA as the backup over what the have now.
I also hope they're joking when they say they're "fine" with what they have at WR. Unless Stephen Williams is getting good a lot quicker expected, they don't have any semblance of a 2nd receiver.
If they got the 2nd receiver and the left tackle position cleared up
NFC West = f
A good tandem of TEs can mask the absence of a 2WR. Floyd and edwards are gone, Moss may be a possibility but just expect Komar, Doucet and Roberts to be #2 WR.
I don't know if we make the wildcard, we've heard this all before. What I do want is to wreck Peyton so bad week 1. Blitzkrieg dat azz!
Which they could do with cap room to spare. They still have cap room out the ass, and extending Fitz wouldn't cost much more as he's already making a ton.
Getting someone who can actually play left tackle in the NFL should be their #1 priority tho.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions