Learn the game of basketball. After that you will no longer overvalue stats.
If you replace Kobe with Duncan on those 2005-07 Lakers that they would get the 4th seed and make it out of the first round
stats from that season fromm both players
2004-05
Kobe - 27.6 PPG, 5.9 RPG, 6.0 APG
Duncan - 20.3 PPG, 11.3 RPG, 2.7 APG
2005-06
Kobe - 35.4 PPG, 5.3 RPG, 4.5 APG
Duncan - 18.6 PPG, 11.0 RPG, 3.2 APG
2006-07
Kobe - 31.6 PPG, 5.7 RPG, 5.4 APG
Duncan - 20.0 PPG, 10.6 PPG, 3.4 APG
for those 3 years
steals, kobe averaged 1.5, Duncan 0.8
blocks, Kobe averaged 0.6, Duncan 2.3
so If you replaced Kobe with Duncan, would the Lakers be better?
Last edited by Deuce Bigalow; 08-12-2011 at 04:08 PM.
Learn the game of basketball. After that you will no longer overvalue stats.
Lakers sucked too much those years for any one player to make a difference. If Luke Walton was your starter, you would be lucky to even make the playoffs.
i know the game of basketball
stats dont tell me everything
but, kobe was the lakers, he did everything for them
duncan did the same for his team
so answer thew question, you saw them both play didnt you
Walton or Bonner?
manu, parker, bruce bowen, horry
i dont overvalue stats
but it was a comparison, what was i supposed to put?
Those two are probably best friends. They share a common interest of being liabilities on teams.
Bonner can actually shoot the 3 really well
except when it actually matters
Ok I'll play just this one time.
If Kobe shares the ball and learns how to play within the system instead of trying to be the savior in spite of the system, the team very well could have done much better.
Kobe's scoring numbers mean little more than Iverson's. Iverson won a few scoring les. Like Iverson, Kobe is a volume shooter and the team has to live with the fact that he's going to shoot even at times when others are open. He's going to keep his team out of sync if that gets him more looks. He likes to win if it means he gets the glory, but he seems to prefer loss over sacrificing the number of shots he takes.
Kobe used those years to pad his scoring. Once he realized he had no real big underneath to get him another ring, he said " it" and just got his.
When you have Shaq ing about not getting touches, you got a problem, especially when Shaq was unstoppable once he got the ball in the paint.
If Kobe finds a way to appease Shaq's need for attention, the Lakers win 5 in a row easily.
"replace KObe with Duncan"
another 5 year old thread![]()
hows this trolling?
a spurs fan said this, he said that duuncan would make that team better
you just compared kobe to iverson
I just throw the switch & boil it down. It's ended up the same damn way every in' time since Pierce got happy & Artest ended him:::
Kobe: 5
tired old bag Duncan: 4
why u hatin on duncan
how could you hate him?
"Then Culby pokes his head out of the bathroom and says 'you know, boiled down, it's still Duncan 4 Kobe 5'".
lol
Exactly right.
Iverson was a volume shooter. Kobe is a volume shooter. You cannot compare volume shooters with people like Duncan using offensive stats.
31.6 ppg on 22.8 FGA is volume shooting?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)