Per Andy Staples tweet:
In the letter A&M prez Loftin sent to Beebe, he asked that the B12 spell out withdrawal procedures.
Per Andy Staples article on SI.com 'The letter is similar to the one sent last year by Nebraska chancellor Harvey Perlman shortly before the Cornhuskers left the Big 12 for the Big Ten.
I'm guessing Aggy used the same letter Nebraska out, except just crossed out Nebraska and hand wrote "Texas A&M" on top of Nebraska.
Nice backpedaling..."I was just trolling/kidding this entire time
"
You've crusaded for new rules and player safety ever since Week 5 last year, when there was a statistical anomaly of malicious hits--since then you've done nothing but bring emotion to this argument (like only a would do).
Truth be told, your post-Mavs le re ation is still going strong and affecting your posting in all forums now. DPG bent you over in the NBA Forum (DPCLD), Rogue bent you over in the Club, and now you're looking to the NFL Forum for some lovin'
Who wants this thread to die now? , keep it going strong so I can give you weekly updates on concussions.
Now go home and get your in' shinebox
I bet the OP & all the sips feel stupid now!
tu even has said they dont wanna play A&M anymore,kinda dumb of them to pick up thier ball & go home!
I guess you didn't believe all the dominoes would fall until you watched the entire clip.
You're an idiot.
Texas A&M will kick tech's ass one more time, then it's over for the foreseeable future.
t.u. is accusing the Aggies of being scared and running... yet they're threatening to stop playing us. What a bunch of pussies.
When is our football team scheduled to play yours?
A&M is picking up its ball and moving away.
If the lege would allow it, I'd advocate a Big (insert number of conference members here) shunning of A&M forevah.
True. But we're willing to continue our in-state rivalry with texas. They seem unwilling.
League? As in the conference? Not being a , just don't know what you're trying to say. Can't really talk about A&M "running scared" if we're offering to playing texas still and they say no.If the lege would allow it, I'd advocate a Big (insert number of conference members here) shunning of A&M forevah.
What's in it for UT?
Short for state legislature. Actions have consequences.League? As in the conference? Not being a , just don't know what you're trying to say. Can't really talk about A&M "running scared" if we're offering to playing texas still and they say no.
Longhorn Network ---> A&M's leaving
A&M's leaving ---> no more rivalries
Seeing that A&M's move is a retaliation of sorts, why wouldn't they expect a retaliation in return?
Now that I think about it, A&M can pretty much guarantee their rivalry with UT in perpetuity if they agree to show all the matches on the Longhorn Network.
Wow, you're clueless. Leave it alone.
The last post was a joke, son.
The one before it? Quite serious.
Collectively, A&M seems to have borderline personality disorder. Hypersensitivity is indeed a symptom.
so you do believe A&M is leaving even though there hasn't been an official announcement.
Pick a lane on your way out
Avoiding the fact that A&M will whoop tech's ass.
The legislature isn't doing a damn thing. If you were filled in at all, you'd know this.
LHN isn't the only reason for A&M's departure.
Wouldn't true "retaliation" be beating your rival annually? Financially, it makes no sense to end the rivalry. It's all about the money for both sides.
The conference will respond, and then hopefully A&M will really leave.
I've been saying it's a process pretty much.. the ball hopefully makes a few passes here and aTm will make a Dwight Howard type dunk in the end. They are benefiting from Nebraska and Colorado leaving the conference just before them so there is some kind of fairness level the conference has to go by here.
I expect OU to leave next, and then OK St on their backs and perhaps s or Baylor if not both after that. I think Texas has a 50/50 shot with either ultimately becoming an independent or really joining the SEC in further expansion.
Think of it this way: when your wife hands you a divorce, hey, it may or may not be your fault. If it happens to you a second time, though, then a year later, a third, maybe it's time to start looking in the mirror. Colorado & Nebraska last year, and now Texas A&M... yet you dummies insist the blame lies with A&M. Um, okay
Not yet. And I'm talking about the lege's working in your favor, dumbass. Like I said--hypersensitive.
Yes, the causes of butthurt are myriad.LHN isn't the only reason for A&M's departure.
What money is in it for UT that wouldn't be in it if they face someone/anyone else?Wouldn't true "retaliation" be beating your rival annually? Financially, it makes no sense to end the rivalry. It's all about the money for both sides.
How much money does UT stand to lose by not playing A&M?
No reason to think that won't happen. No reason to respond to it.
Avoiding the fact that A&M will whoop tech's ass.
I'd rather continue to make fun of you not being able to pick a lane.
financially, A&M needs the UT game much more than UT.
On stsa they said UT was going to try and start an annual game with Norte Dame to replace the a&m game.
that 4 game series starting in 2015 was put together a year ago.
No. Its simple...
t.u. did what what they felt was in their best interest, now A&M is doing what it thinks is best for them...rivalry game is a separate issue. Absolutely, zero logical reasons the two cannot continue to play. In fact, there are many out of conference rivalries...no big deal.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
