kobe>duncan, TD would be #2
If Duncan were in LA, Shaq would be the obvious second option![]()
kobe>duncan, TD would be #2
what? when did this happen?
and Manu was the real 2005 Finals MVP
I think it's safe to say that if the Spurs had Kobe instead of Duncan we would have never won a single le.
^
+ it wouldn't be:::
Kobe: 5
tired old bag Duncan: 4
tee, hee.
tied for most consecutive 50+ win season with 12, never missed the playoffs since entering the nba, 2nd most les in last decade as well.
just like how gasol was the 2010 finals mvp.
now go to wikipedia & nba.com and post only ppg so you can try to make a point about kobe deserving the 2010 finals mvp.
2010 Finals
Kobe - 28.6 ppg and 8.0 rpg
Gasol - 18.6 ppg and 11.6 rpg
Kobe and Gasol outrebounded the celtics starting 5 in game 7
gasol had more rebounds, but 8 rpg for a SG is great, and Kobe scored 70 more points in the series, deserved MVP
So you agree.![]()
since the spurs actually had a team in 05-07, Spurs would win 5, maybe more with Kobe
On and off the court, the San Antonio Spurs stand out as the most dominant franchise of the '00s.
http://www.forbes.com/2009/12/04/bes...ade-teams.html
Somehow without raising much ado, Gregg Popovich works his 15th season, which now makes him the longest tenured coach in the NBA, never having sniffed a losing record. And Tim Duncan plays his 14th season, with the Spurs owning the best winning percentage since he arrived of any team in any professional sport.
http://www.usatoday.com/sports/colum...io-spurs_N.htm
![]()
2004-05
Kobe - 27.6 PPG, 5.9 RPG, 6.0 APG
Duncan - 20.3 PPG, 11.3 RPG, 2.7 APG
2005-06
Kobe - 35.4 PPG, 5.3 RPG, 4.5 APG
Duncan - 18.6 PPG, 11.0 RPG, 3.2 APG
2006-07
Kobe - 31.6 PPG, 5.7 RPG, 5.4 APG
Duncan - 20.0 PPG, 10.6 PPG, 3.4 APG
for those 3 years
steals, kobe averaged 1.5, Duncan 0.8
blocks, Kobe averaged 0.6, Duncan 2.3
thats just a 3 year strecth, Lakers would be better with Kobe instead of mediocre Gasol like Duncan
any that plays Dungeon's and Dragons and calls himself Merlin takes a back seat to KobePERIOD!![]()
Without Duncan, the Spurs never win one, not one.
Lakers
most championships
most finals
most playoff wins
Spurs
more regular season wins
![]()
You really don't know anything about basketball.
Stop moving the goalposts.
I was right when I said the Spurs were the winningest franchise in ALL OF SPORTS.
I never said they were the richest.
Goalposts have been moved.
/game
Lakers
most championships
most finals
most finals wins
most playoff wins
you really are delusional If you think the Spurs were the team of the decade
You don't even think about what you're responding to, you just type in some stats and drivel and post it.
You suck as a troll. You're way too easy to defeat.
Look up these two words:
Team
Franchise
Get back to me when you do.
You see, a Tim Duncan cannot make a team "the team of the decade" because he doesn't control the spending. What he has done is help make the Spurs the Franchise of the decade, meaning they are the epitome of all over teams in pro sports, including that Hollywood fest you worship.
2000-2004 Lakers, shaq and kobe
3 championships
4 finals
3 championships, 4 finals > 3 championships, 3 finals
/thread
Shhh...
Team
Franchise
Decade
spurs never repeated one time lol and you think there the team of the deacde when the Lakers 3 peated? LOL
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)