Listen we all know that Parker has better stats and is a better all around player but is he more clutch? With the game on the line and 1 shot is needed would you trust Tony Parker or Derek Fisher to take that shot...Also consider what Tony Paker gives up on the defensive end. Tony Parker can be punked all day and night...and for this I'm going with Fish at the end of the day...No way Parker could withstand Boston's defense and battle Ray Allen with hardcore tenacity...they'd break Parker in two...and no way could Parker deliver shots to Scola like Fish did...
Regular Season - Parker
Playoffs and Final Shot for a Championship - Fisher
This is what Fish gives you
Last edited by Spursfan092120; 09-05-2011 at 11:32 PM.
No one's going to give you because you're broke.
ok not bad
Let us proceed...
I agree, Fisher > Parker, and Fisher wasn't even the 4th best player on those Laker championship teams, while Parker has been 2nd/3rd best in all those Spurs championship teams.
Lakers teams simply staaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaacked.
period
Give me Tony Parker anytime. Derek "you'll see in the playoffs, I'll prove you wrong![]()
![]()
" Fisher.
piece of using his daughter's diseases as an excuse to play in LA and Utah over
You've no room. Your Pop searched out a rapist who could shoot a basketball.
hitting a big 3 in the last few minutes after hurting your own team the entire game > contributing for 48 minutes
While yours developed a rapist out of an existing player.
saying he needed to be closer to the East Coast
Los Angeles being "closer to the East Coast"
whoring his daughter's cancer as a means to get out of a contract
taking advantage of a team that felt bad for his situation
suddenly claiming there's a doctor in LA that works with the doctor in NY
sand bagging Utah and signing with the one team he knew they didn't want him going to
If this doesn't make you cry then you're a cold hearted bas s rectum...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)