Reply With Quote
you
at least 4 based on my estimation...
you
Kevin
But in 2003, we made Kobe criedperiod and raperiod
I know how many he cost LA
2001, 2002, 2008 ...... that's 3
I see one, at most. My opinion....at least 4 based on my estimation...
2001 Spurs would have beaten Sixers.
2002 Kings would have beaten Spurs
2004 T-Wolves or Pistons would have beat Spurs, the latter for certain.
2008 Celtics would have beaten Spurs.
To be fair, How many les did the Spurs cost the Lakers? Maybe 1.
1999 Lakers would have lost to Blazers
2003 If Lakers beat Mavs, yeah, they 4peat. This is your maybe 1.
Oh yeah, forgot the earlier series they played. Lakers beat Spurs in WCF in 1982 and 1983 and Sixers would have won finals both years against SA. A couple more wins that decade were against weaker Spurs teams. In 1995, the Lakers would have lost to the Rockets.
Too bad George Gervin never made a finals. He was close when SA was in the east, 1979 I think, Spurs had lead in ECF against Washington and lost. 1981 SA was upset by Houston (40-42) in 2nd round and would have cakewalked in WCF against the KC Kings, who were 40-42. However, the Lakers weren't in their path in either season, they were eliminated by other teams.
I don't think there is any way the 2004 Wolves would have beaten the Spurs with both Cassell and Hudson injured. Would have been a of a Finals though with how deep that Pistons team was in 04.
Don Nelson
Two Thousand
8
actually without Kobe Spurs don't win 2003 and 2005
thanks Kobe
tbh, that Lakers team wouldnt have beaten the TWolves with a healthy Cassell ...... best mid range shooter in the game at that time.
I agree
You mean Shaq.
no, we mean Kobe
None, actually.
Denial is a river in Egypt.
Kobe's done way more damage to the Spurs than Shaq has. Including the last L the Lakers dropped on your guys in the playoffs.
Kobe has done so much damage to the Spurs that you guys went out and got Bruce Lee Bowen to slow him down.
You were saying?
Why would the Spurs need to load up to defend Shaq when they had two of best interior defenders in the league at the time?Kobe's done way more damage to the Spurs than Shaq has. Including the last L the Lakers dropped on your guys in the playoffs.
Kobe has done so much damage to the Spurs that you guys went out and got Bruce Lee Bowen to slow him down.
You were saying?
Christ, you're a dumbass.
"I'll gladly take '08 Bynum over '03 Shaq."
You mean Shaq?
You proved my point. The Spurs did NOT have to load up for Shaq. But they did for Kobe. Even after the Admiral retired, they still had to deal with Shaq. Did they go out and sign a great low post defender? No. So why would you guys conclude that Shaq did more damage to the Spurs than Kobe? It doesn't make sense.
And don't use the Lord's name in vain. Thanks.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
