Reply With Quote
My two favorite lines...
Cameraman: "You're not on the PR staff, are you?"
Longshoreman: "My name is You, sucker!"
...cons uents.
The new civility. This is who Mic e's date, Trumpka, and Barack's emcee, Hoffa, represent.
My two favorite lines...
Cameraman: "You're not on the PR staff, are you?"
Longshoreman: "My name is You, sucker!"
So, let's see if I have this right...
A U. S. Congressman can make up a story about being spat upon and called ###### -- without out any proof -- and it will pretty much run on the news, nonstop, for days.
The President of the AFL-CIO can introduce the President of the United States by imploring him to go to war with Republicans and offering to "take the sons of es out," and, then 500 members of that union can invade a port facility, take hostages, and vandalize the place and it will barely get mentioned, if at all.
Got it.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/09/bu...les-ports.html
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationwo...,2369812.story
http://www.seattlepi.com/local/artic...rk-2162730.php
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011...ke-gone-wrong/
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...googlenews_wsj
http://www.businessweek.com/ap/finan.../D9PKFFHG0.htm
Plus 140 or so other MSM hits on Google.
It's a media conspiracy!
Don't be fooled by all the follow up stories -- they buried it!
Not one mention of Obama's buddies Trumpka and Hoffa or their violent rhetoric.
Some nut, totally unrelated to politics, opens fire at a Democrat Congresswoman's cons uent meeting and the media falls over itself making a connection between the nut and the Tea Party, Governor Palin, in particular. Then they spent days and weeks whoring the angle.
Yeah, no bias here...
The first video I posted and the one below are the ugly face of Obama's core cons uency yet, you can't get the national media to connect a few dots.
The President goes on national television and calls for civility in the wake of Congresswoman Giffords shooting, and, yet, can't be bothered to comment on the actions of those with whom he shares the stage and allows to sit by his wife.
No, no bias...
Fake outrage is still fake.
President Barack Obama is in bed with unions and this is what they represent. You're okay with that?Fake outrage is still fake.
Who's faking outrage? This President has been one outrage after another.
The longshoremen ed up. Not sure what that has to do with Obama or Trumka.
Did anyone get shot?
The attempt to link Palin to the Gifford shooting was lame and I said so here. Just as lame as your attempt to link Obama to the longshoremen's riot. Weak sauce is still weak.
The longshoreman's union is headed by a vitriolic thug that is imploring the President of the United States to use them as an "army" to "take the sons of es out." There's your connection. Hoffa says they'd like the gig. 500 of his thugs prove they're a violent group, beyond anything the media has ever imagined or shown from a Tea Party supporter.
A crazed gunman shot a Congresswoman. Not sure what that has to do with the Tea Party or Sarah Palin. Yet, the media pretty much tortured reasonableness to sell the idea there was.
Has anyone ever been taken hostage, or shot, by anyone associated with the Tea Party?
Well, we're not talking about you, are we?
You're doing exactly the same thing. It's just as pathetic.
Your sauce is weaker than usual, bro. That's what I meant to emphasize.
I think the way media frames stories is significant.
There is more of a connection between President Obama and Union violence than there is between the Tea Party and Sarah Palin and any of the violence the media has gone overboard to connect to them.
Remember the SEIU violence during the Obamacare debate? Ken Gladney does.
Your media analysis is trite and you ape what you abhor.
I'm not the media.
Rhetorical gambit is the same. You not being the media doesn't make it any more credible.
The lame remains the same.
With very disparate results.
Media fabricates a connection between Tea Party and Giffords shooting, s in the news cycles for weeks and ignorant knuckle-draggers believe the Tea Party is a violent movement -- even in the absence of any credible evidence to support the hypothesis.
Media is faced with competing stories of a Union President offering to "take the sons of es out" for the President of the United States and stories of a large mob of thugs, from that very same Union, taking hostages and vandalizing a port and, hmmm..., no one, in the media, thinks the two could possibly be related.
No one? Don't Drudge and Breitbart count as media?
Actually, I believe they're both news aggregators. But, they're not ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC, or FOX.
I forgot how horrible you are at this. Really, truly, abysmally bad. It's hard for me to conceive how anyone could be so preposterously wrong, nonstop, without trying to. Must come naturally.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
