The play where he was ruled out at the one was , at least review it.
Don't necessarily have a horse in this race, but there was definitely some shady afoot in their game against Miss St.
At the very least, you'd think if they give Auburn that extra inch for the first down in the 3rd, they'd give Miss St the same inch to finish out the game...
The play where he was ruled out at the one was , at least review it.
The play I mentioned was over midway through the 3rd quarter. Auburn, up by only a TD, goes for it on 4th and 1. The runner doesn't seem to get much, if ANY, past the line of scrimmage.
Yet, they get a favorable spot. They bring out the chains, the camera focuses in, and they still looked over an inch or so short, yet the officials give Auburn the 1st down.
If I'm not mistaken, they continue to drive and eventually score. So, instead of MS St getting an opportunity to tie the game with good field position, Auburn's up by 14, at home.
shyne's point was about a possible missed TD call that wasn't even reviewed with 10 or so secs left.
It's ing Auburn what do you expect.
The SEC tries to keep schools like MSU down because they don't bring the revenue that Auburn does.
Auburn got helped against Arkansas and Bama last year otherwise there'd be no NT the NCAA will take back in a couple years.
SEC refs would never try to help certain teams win.Does anyone remember this from a couple years ago?
why is the SEC trying to keep arkansas down?
Cause they are a crappy swc left over.
The more times I see the highlight, the more it looks like Vick Ballard easily crossed the plane on that leap.
Oh well. em.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)