Reply With Quote
6-24
Choking?
Kobe>Duncan
Duncan and his mediocre 22/12 playoff runs lol
6-24
Choking?
your point?
For Deuce:
Duncan's '99 playoff PER: 25.1
Kobe's '02 playoff PER: 20.1
That's a huge disparity.
Duncan's '05 playoff PER: 24.9
Kobe's '09 playoff PER: 24.4
Duncan's '07 playoff PER: 27.4
Kobe's 10 playoff PER: 24.7
The stats don't back you up. Sorry.
10 4th quarter points in the 4th quarter of game 7 and 15 rebounds
You can't compare a the 2nd best player to Tim Duncan.
PER?
lets give it up to the 2nd Greatest Player of Alltime, David Robinson*
*according to PER
PER is worthless! But TS% isn't!!!
you cant compare a 22/12 guy to a 29/6/6 guy
David is 4th on the all-time PER list dumbPER?
lets give it up to the 2nd Greatest Player of Alltime, David Robinson*
*according to PER
posting FG% of a SG and C doesnt work, Kobe takes 3s, do you know what a 3 pointer is?PER is worthless! But TS% isn't!!!
TS%
You did it to yourself.
Like it matters when Kobe's usual statline is something along the lines of 8-32 for 25 points
TBH, I kinda like the implications of the TS%.PER is worthless! But TS% isn't!!!
Kareem, Magic, Hakeem, Kobe, Bird are not even top 10*
*according to PER
Kobe doesnt have games like that
Like it matters when Kobe's usual statline is something along the lines of 8-32 for 25 points
and Kobe rarely even takes 30+ shots, he never had a series of 30+ FGA average
Can you imagine how many championships Duncan would have if he was the 2nd best player on the Spurs?
he won 2, 2005 and 2007
He was the MVP on both of those teams. He was the best player on the 2005 team. If he was a Kobe like player he would have won the MVP in 2007.
David is 4th all time in regular season PER. And besides, Robinson is one of the greatest regular season players of all time, which is ultimately meaningless when you don't follow through in the playoffs.PER?
lets give it up to the 2nd Greatest Player of Alltime, David Robinson*
*according to PER
I've explained to you how PER is legitimate and you've yet to come up with a reasonable counter-argument other than "b-b-but player A has a higher PER than player B and we all know player B is bettah so PER is no good!."
Jordan is number 1 all time in both playoff and regular season PER. And he's considered the GOAT, so....
Manu was the best player in the 2005 Playoffs and Finals
Parker was the best player in the 2007 Finals
2005? That's funny seeing as how Duncan beat Ginobili in your favorite stat category, PPG. Please explain to me how Ginobili's FG% and lower point totals makes him better that year (oh the irony)
Kareem, Magic, Hakeem, Kobe, Bird are not even top 10*David is 4th all time in regular season PER. And besides, Robinson is one of the greatest regular season players of all time, which is ultimately meaningless when you don't follow through in the playoffs.
I've explained to you how PER is legitimate and you've yet to come up with a reasonable counter-argument other than "b-b-but player A has a higher PER than player B and we all know player B is bettah so PER is no good!
Jordan is number 1 all time in both playoff and regular season PER. And he's considered the GOAT, so....
*according to PER
Again, Parker scored the most points - he was not the best player.
you're stupid.
Since you didn't read what I said.
Do you need me to explain the bold part? Or can you figure it out?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
