When you have some credible evidence, we would all love to see it.
What dirty trick?
When you have some credible evidence, we would all love to see it.
Do your own research
I have some years back. Couldn't find anything credible. That's why I ask for something credible.
I think Herman Cain is more aligned with Tea Party ideals than almost any of the other candidates in the Republican Primary.
Ron Paul is the least aligned with the Tea Party movement.
This is what primaries are for; to find a candidate. Last I heard, Obama is polling to lose to any Republican. Might as well be Herman Cain.
I thought Bachmann was the Tea Party candidate by excellence.
Romney probably has the better shot at the actual presidential election. I would actually vote for him over Obama at this stage.
I don't understand.
With all the idiot things our president has done and said, even the stupidest GOP candidate is a better choice.
Bingo! Libs don't have anything credible against Clarence Thomas, but they'll keep on repeating the same old tired attacks.
Sexual predator? o William Jefferson Clinton
Tax cheat? Say o to Timothy Geithner and Charlie Rangel
Ethically compromised? Charlie Rangel is the poster boy
boutons is so funny... but since I have him on ignore, I can't see his posts unless someone else quotes him
So, what are the differences in Romney and Cain that, should Cain be the nominee, would drive you to vote for Obama -- or, to not vote Republican?
Exactly, which is why I said he's going to reap the benefits of Perry being a moron. If Perry had shown himself at even a GED level in any of those debates Florida would have been "Herman who?". The tea party establishment clearly wants to throw their support behind Perry but he's not delivering and his record is getting holes shot in it every day (as I predicted).
Well, of course they don't have any love for Crazy Ron which is why Cain is going to get his 15 minutes of fame until Perry can get his act together...if he can. And I'm not paying any real attention to general election polls until late next year. Polls change by the month. Look no further than Golden Boy Rick Perry. Not too long ago he was leaps and bounds ahead of everyone else and now he's looking like the village idiot. People are too fickle these days and going by polls this early makes no sense.Ron Paul is the least aligned with the Tea Party movement. This is what primaries are for; to find a candidate. Last I heard, Obama is polling to lose to any Republican. Might as well be Herman Cain.
Again, that's what the primary season is for. But, if the Tea Party movement gravitates to Cain, it does kind of put the lie to it being a bunch of racists, no?
Well, it's more than the polls.
No in bent has won reelection with an unemployment rate above 7.2% And, from what I understand, getting the unemployment rate back to that level is damn near impossible before November of next year. Particularly if Obama continues to pursue the policies to which he's apparently shackled himself.
I think Obama loses. Period. Now, to whom is the question.
I think the 2012 election will be a mirror of 2008. Libs are becoming disillusioned with The Anointed One and will probably stay home; Republicans are mad and energized and will vote for anyone other than Obama.I think Obama loses. Period. Now, to whom is the question.
Probably the major reason any republican will win this next election.
Even the proud republican, Londo Mollari, if he had fake citizenship and was running.
I also think there are a certain number of liberals and independents that are more than disillusioned but, are mad and energized to vote against Obama.
Obviously, one should be much more skeptical of his surgeons than his presidential candidates. After all, how do we know that Herman Cain isn't where he is because of affirmative action? Surely, we should begin with deep skepticism about his background and qualifications. It's what affirmative action programs force people to do in assessing black professionals.
That's exactly what I thought..Affirmative Action at work
Without speaking to whether or not Herman Cain has ever benefitted from preferential race-based government policies, such as affirmative action, (I don't know that he has), there's a difference between excising a brain tumor and making policy decisions.
The surgeon has no one to hold his hand as he, or she, rummages around in your brain. It's a solo activity that requires near perfect skills. Political and policy decisions, you can surround yourself with smart people who can help shape those. It's not brain surgery.
Nice try FWD but, without the blue sarcasm font, one should be more skeptical of whether or not the guy poking around in your brain is a product of affirmative action than some politician.
By the way, I don't recall anyone ever saying Barack Obama was a product of affirmative action or that being so made him less qualified to be President.
Then he should be the libs ideal candidate!![]()
n/m.
Props to Herman Cain and those who voted for him.
Romney leans more to the center. That's what I'm looking for.
Cain would be more of Barry.
I would suggest Cain leans more to the center than does Obama.
Don't think so.
I think you guys are setting yourselves up for disappointment much like the lefties set themselves up in 2004 when they thought Kerry could take Bush. When push comes to shove the people are going to be there for Obama rather than let one of the crazies in the white house. The only candidate with a chance in at beating Obama is Romney and that's because he's moderate and actually shows some kind of sanity the rest of the Republican field lacks.
2012 won't even be close to a mirror of 2008. You won't see that kind of energy again. Right wingers may be mad but they're disorganized and are still searching for a frontrunner to throw that energy behind. Right now there's not one republican with the kind of aura Obama had in 2008. They anointed Rick Perry as the golden child early but he's turning into Gomer Pyle and the heat hasn't even been turned up yet. Cain is a third tier candidate who's going to get his 15 minutes but I doubt he'll get any wind in his sails from the exposure. Any candidate that gets the nomination besides Romney and Obama will have a 2nd term. Throw Romney in the mix and it's a toss-up.
Duplicate see below
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)