Reply With Quote
Wake me up when Greenland is teen again.
By your immature nature, I will assume I was studying electronics, physics, chemistry, etc. long before you were born. When I make mistakes in terminology, or don't explain it well, it's because I'm rusty at it.
Wake me up when Greenland is teen again.
Just showing off my ample domination of the Spanish language, tbh
http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiristor
LOL...Just showing off my ample domination of the Spanish language, tbh
http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiristor
I'll bet you know Spanish better than I know English.
Did you just pull the 'you're immature' and plead your age?
Remember when you had those writeups on the wonderful new gas boilers that the oil and gas industry had and gave us that pitch? Can you remember that far back?
A good time to re-post this.
I doubt that will happen for some time, but who knows. I think the Milankovitch Cycle and solar intensity are more a factor than greenhouse gasses. The radiative forcing from CO2 at those temperatures would be so weak. Right now, the northern hemisphere is closer to the sun in the winter due to eccentricity, but gets very little sun because of the earths tilt. Thousands of years ago, when the precession of the earth was different, it received more solar energy in the summer. Our current elliptical orbit causes the earth to receive about 10% more energy in Dec/Jan than it does in Jun/Jul. This favors a melting of Antarctica over Greenland and the Northern ice cap, yet it's the north that is melting? One of the reasons why I blame soot from Asia, for the northern ice retreat. I don't think this is enough to make Greenland green again, but who knows. Mostly speculation on my part.
Everyone needs to stop driving cars, stop using electricity and stop doing anything that supports or utilizes anything made by devices that add to the problem.
Otherwise, it's really not a problem.
Aye, the point I was attempting to make. Apparently this requires a more direct approach with WC.
How can someone even consider something so laughable?
99.99999999999999999999999999% chance. Really now.
What are the odds WC and Darrin make this thread 65 pages long too?
You are either really stupid, a disgusting shill or both. You do not even know how to begin to assign a probability to an outlier. Your comments the other clearly indicate that you have no idea about statistical analysis. Just die.
There really isn't any hope for you, is there?
I'll repeat:
Well, it depends on the evidence. As it stands, I do not accept the claims of the IPCCC that CO2 warming from 1750 to 2004 increase by 1.49 to 1.83 watts/square meter. With more recent acknowledgements of solar forcing and soot forcing, their numbers need some serious revisions. Show me some good evidence of a particular waring increase, and I will not be able to disagree.I doubt very seriously that this is an answerable question, at least not to your satisfaction.
Back the truck up.
"no one disputes" that the earth is warming, seems to directly contradict you have been saying for years.
You and the other asshats have been arguing for years that there has been *no* warming.
What is funny is that particular schtick has now gotten so ed even the skeptics have had to abandon that, just like the 9-11 truthers had to abandon the stupidist parts of their theories, when the stupidity became patently obvious to all but the most braindead/damaged.
If, in 20 years, a continued rise in temperatures and climate disruption goes hand in hand with increases in CO2/GHG concentrations, that will then become so patently obvious that the entire skeptic movement will be similarly fatally discredited.
The causes and effects will be far more clear with another 20 years' data.
I am optimistic that it won't be quite so late to do something to mitigate the worst effects.
Hopefully those who faked objective skepticism will offer themselves up for a swift kick in the ass by all the people their political hackery ed over.
Do I need to find the post where you claim that you are right and there is only a "one in a trillion" chance you are wrong, or something similar?
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/show...postcount=1476
Hopefully those 20 years will be more convincing than the last 10-15 years.
Your lazy ass will have to find a post older than 2 months to really be able to show my memory about what you have been saying false.
"We have entered a cooling phase." Globally, warming is just "possible".Is the earth warming?
Not Darrin specifically, but I'm still browsing.
Darrin's 2010 thread en led "Earth Enters New Cold Climate Era"
I think I will stop there. It seems Darrin has pushed the "there is no warming trend" idea.
You want more links Darrin?
Post away. I think I know my own opinion.
Here's another article with a part where a "cooling trend" was played up/bolded.
I feel better about my memory now.
So, if your opinion has not changed, then why have you relished in posting things about cooling trends?
The posts I found weren't really your statements, they were things you decided were pertinent. I guess your memory could be correct, and I am just remembering things you have hinted at, as opposed to actually said.
So, either
1) your memory of your own opinion is faulty, and you are an idiot.
or
2) your memory of your own opinion is correct, but you posted things you knew to be false, in an attempt to discredit the theory you disagree with.
Which is it, idiot or liar?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
