2011 playoff stats: Kobe vs Manu

[Killakobe81]

But idiots also don't know how to argue the actual argument and instead cling to semantics as well tbh..

Name calling ...that's how the "regulator" lays the smack down. Clever. No wonder Kool. Luva cully cower in fear on here ...oh wait ...

[Baron Davιs]

KillaKobe regulatin'.
Warren G status.

[Giuseppe]

tired old bag kobe

I'm a trend setter.

I set trends.

[DPG21920]

1. For someone who writes with the tone of an arrogant superiority, you sure dont get a lot. Manu had a great series for the most part. A small sample size gives you a great chance at having great efficiency numbers it's not that hard...or do i have to spell evrything out?

2. I didnt say getting swept was great even by the champs. I live in dallas so i have to hear that ...I doubt you live in memphis. You were the genius regulator that said Memphis was >>>>> better than the Hornets and the Lakers got swept.YOU started conmapring the teams, not me I used YOUR logic.

3. My original point was Kobe led his team to a series victory Manu did not. So who cares if is stats were better he did not win a single round. So back when Lakers were losing in the 1st round to the suns because Kobe had better stats than Manu that was one great moral victory?
YOU started comparing the griz to the Hornets I just focused on the result.

and for the record if I was in a compe ion If i lost to the champ I would feel better knowing I was beaten by the best.Losing to a mediocre squad that had never won anything would feel worse especially I were the better player (or team) Does it change anything in the grand scheme? No. BTW, I can pull all up all kinds of stats that say the Mavs were a GREAT playoff team ..but who cares?! They won the result is ALL that matters. Only insecure fanbases need to diminish what the Mavs did or Dirk for that matter.

Outside of the ass kicking the grizz gave yall what did the Grizz really accomplish? They pushed a dumb young OKC team to 7 ...the Mavs went on to beat every team they faced. Including sweeping us. Yall should be glad the Grizz did ya a favor. Using your logic if they swept us they would of pushed your " -in"

Just teasing DPG ...sorta

Name calling ...that's how the "regulator" lays the smack down. Clever. No wonder Kool. Luva cully cower in fear on here ...oh wait ...

I seriously think you aren't aware of what you type. I never compared the Mavs to Memphis. Never. You didn't use my logic. My logic was that if Memphis was a better team than NO, and LA struggled with NO, that Memphis would stand a shot to beat LA. How does that logic imply Memphis is better than Dallas?

A small sample size doesn't mean you have any better chance at anything. You would have just as much of a chance to do poorly and not recover as you would to do well.

You did say that getting swept by the CHAMPS was some sort of accomplishment. , you even did it in this very post

and for the record if I was in a compe ion If i lost to the champ I would feel better knowing I was beaten by the best.

Your point was that Kobe led his team to a first round win against a hobbled NO, so what do stats matter ? This thread is dedicated solely to comparing stats. If you didn't like that, why respond to something like this? I focused on the result that Manu won as many 2nd round games this year as Kobe.

Why would Dallas sweeping the LA mean they would push the Spurs in ? Spur had a better record than LA and lost to a team that could have also beaten LA. I never diminished what Dallas did. I said they weren't some dominant team. Just because you win a le doesn't mean you were dominant. That isn't a knock on Dallas and they aren't the only le team that wasn't "dominant".

Also, you look really silly and butthurt when you keep on about my nick name that the site owner gave me I know it hurts you that your fanbase is full of the two biggest idiots on the site, but let it go guy. Also, I wasn't name calling in the post you quoted I was quoting what YH said So, that is another pretty big mess up by you in here.

[Killakobe81]

Kobe struggled against a really bad Hornets team then got swept. Memphis>>>>>>>New Orleans. Sorry.

1. Comparing teams ...

Rick James " I never wiped my feet on eddie Murphy's couch"

[Killakobe81]

But idiots also don't know how to argue the actual argument and instead cling to semantics as well tbh..

I didn't use idiots I was just quoting ...Ok so if you use the n-word to quote someone else but call a group of black guys it they will say no harm no foul?

[DPG21920]

You are not intelligent. That is really the nicest way I can put it

You have a good heart though, keep on playa

[Killakobe81]

I seriously think you aren't aware of what you type. I never compared the Mavs to Memphis. Never. You didn't use my logic. My logic was that if Memphis was a better team than NO, and LA struggled with NO, that Memphis would stand a shot to beat LA. How does that logic imply Memphis is better than Dallas?

A small sample size doesn't mean you have any better chance at anything. You would have just as much of a chance to do poorly and not recover as you would to do well.

You did say that getting swept by the CHAMPS was some sort of accomplishment. , you even did it in this very post



Your point was that Kobe led his team to a first round win against a hobbled NO, so what do stats matter ? This thread is dedicated solely to comparing stats. If you didn't like that, why respond to something like this? I focused on the result that Manu won as many 2nd round games this year as Kobe.

Why would Dallas sweeping the LA mean they would push the Spurs in ? Spur had a better record than LA and lost to a team that could have also beaten LA. I never diminished what Dallas did. I said they weren't some dominant team. Just because you win a le doesn't mean you were dominant. That isn't a knock on Dallas and they aren't the only le team that wasn't "dominant".

Also, you look really silly and butthurt when you keep on about my nick name that the site owner gave me I know it hurts you that your fanbase is full of the two biggest idiots on the site, but let it go guy. Also, I wasn't name calling in the post you quoted I was quoting what YH said So, that is another pretty big mess up by you in here.

I never said Dallas was an all-time great champion ...but I said their run was as impressive as any of the le teams of the past 6 seasons includingthe SPURS AND Lakers ...doesnt mean they are better.

[Venti Quattro]

lol mike conley
lol hamed haddadi
lol darrell arthur
lol greivis vasquez
lol zach weed stealer randolph
lol 8

[Leetonidas]

If we're talking about who is a better team Memphis vs. New Orleans, the Grizz easily take that one. They could've given the Lakers a really tough matchup, and with the way they got destroyed by the Mavericks, the Grizz may have beaten the Lakers because they matched up pretty decently. I have no doubt Z-Bo would've assraped Gasol up and down the court and baby Gasol would've checked ty Boy. The Grizzlies also had 2-3 good wing defenders to throw at Kobe.

Ginobili put up some pretty good stats, and he was playing with an elbow fracture, which is pretty impressive. I truly feel if he was healthy the Spurs would've gotten to lose to OKC or Dallas instead, but Ginobli missing the first game really ed us.

Both players were injured but Ginobili was going at Battier and Allen while Kobe was going up against Ariza and whatever bags they had to throw at him.

[DPG21920]

I don't even care about the topic, I'm just astounded at Killas logic and awful trolling

He musta been drinking a ragin about Kobe calling himself Black Mamba

[Killakobe81]

I don't even care about the topic, I'm just astounded at Killas logic and awful trolling

He musta been drinking a ragin about Kobe calling himself Black Mamba

1. I said the Griz were better I thin even Hornets fans would admit that. I challenged his assertion that Grizz>>>>>>>>>>>Hornets, which is hyperbole.

2. I also said that winning a series was what mattered. Manu was amazing in that series especially in the clutch, but he lost. That was MY point. But apparently the regulator missed that in his team comparison then threw that at me.

3. And no I was not trolling I dont troll. The OP was trolling I was bored so I replied. TBH I did not even look at the "stats" I knew Manu was more efficient than Kobe was because I'm excellent at "watching the games" . I used to coach so I watch "game tape" or used to, so I dont have to rely on stats unless I need to prove a small point.

[lefty]

lol mike conley
lol hamed haddadi
lol darrell arthur
lol greivis vasquez
lol zach weed stealer randolph
lol 8

Also lol TP

[Spur_Fanatic]

OP trolled, rest of you all followed.

[DAF86]

I'll bite.

A man of his word.

[Killakobe81]

Yep, I knew it was didnt care and tbh this thread moved away frm the original topic numerous times so how successful was the OP?

Or is succesful trolling based on number of replies will one of you "profesional trolls" let me know? thanks.