Reply With Quote
Except there aren't. Did you ever get around to admitting you lied when you said there was no damage to the buildings next to 7 WTC?
I didn't think so.
Brave Sir Robin....
Why should we when there are so many obvious holes in the 'official story' to discredit?Do conspiracy nontheorists ever post a theory?
Except there aren't. Did you ever get around to admitting you lied when you said there was no damage to the buildings next to 7 WTC?
I didn't think so.
Brave Sir Robin....
Maybe you can do some research and give me a synopsis of the purpose section of the 9-11 commission report.
The purpose of the 9-11 commission wasn't to study the collapse of individual buildings.
What was the stated purpose of the 9-11 commission, Dan?
my follow up question:
Is it reasonable that the commission didn't address something that was outside the scope of the report?
Proving one theory wrong does not logically prove another theory, math-boy, even if I give you that your debunked bull somehow "disproves" the official theory.
Tell me, if I can't put together a mathmatical proof for one equation, does that automatically prove another equation?
....my biggest complaint is that you seem to have no idea what a real mathematical proof is supposed to look like...
My biggest complaint is that you seem to have no idea what a damaged building looks like.
Another poster has stated his beliefs about 9/11.
Now he has the opportunity to explain fully what he thinks really happened on 9/11.
This should be good. He will certainly be able to expland greatly on this initial claim in great detail!
Bumped for Cant_Be_Faded's review
This pretty much sums up every chumpdumper post regarding 9/11 in this entire forum.
There is plenty more to go by besides the commission report, as I have demonstrated in pretty much every 9/11 thread.
You don't even know what you are ing about.
Bumped for Nbadan after he tried to use 9/11 to distract from his self-ownage in another thread.
Let's hear your theory, dan.
This should make sense to 9/11 conspiracy theorists:
WC was one of your students?
That's not a proof....This should make sense to 9/11 conspiracy theorists:
It's an identical type of proof to what you guys say.
He doesn't need to do the Math..... he has me.
Good. There is a light on upstairs, however dim it may be.
It seems Dan is vying for Magna Laude honors this go round.
Have I shown this before?
Look carefully at this photo. Look at all the debris from the WTC 1 collapsing, striking WTC 7.
This had to cause considerable damage. With the arc of the debris cloud, it was mostly heavy material. Not just smoke.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
