Reply With Quote
I don't think you even know how you owned yourself.
If I have been owned, then so have you...
I don't think you even know how you owned yourself.
WC, you are completely self-blind if you don't see that your standard response is to lock step reflexively support authority. That would have put you squarely in the loyalist camp in 1776.
...ditto..
I don't think you even know how you owned yourself.
Chump all you have to do is point out how the 'conservatives' claims of the 'liberal media' are the exact same argument and have the exact same amount of validity. You don't need to go on and on about it when hes let it drop.
Maybe that's all your confirmation bias sees.
I stand by my point. the M$M stopped filming the Oakland police raid when they were asked by the police....Chumpy hasn't done anything to prove this point was wrong, and all the proof I have posted has reinforced my point...
.....Where is the proof? Where is the video of protestors throwing rocks and bottles at police from the M$M....there is none because they weren't there....
I think FuzzyLumpkins has confirmation bias...
In some of the videos I posted from the occupy movement, you can see tons of news vans in the area as people are running from the teargas....yet not one source from the M$M managed to film the attack on the ground....
....and Chumpy is right?
You don't understand how to apply the argument. Its so cute watching you read things and misapply them. You are really really dumb.
I have only seen the media report that the police claimed that. I have never seen them claim it independently. Could be wrong. My point is that the so called conservatives claim the media is biased against them too. Its the exact same tactic and its weak.In some of the videos I posted from the occupy movement, you can see tons of news vans in the area as people are running from the teargas....yet not one source from the M$M managed to film the attack on the ground....
....and Chumpy is right?
Furthermore, while you firmly have your democrat pom poms out trying to coopt this movement to your notion of liberal. They don't support your Obama sucking either.
What a better way to muddy-the-water, if a wing-nut is claiming media bias, it probably is weak, but you still haven't shown me the M$M videos of the Oakland attacks on the ground or of protestors throwing rocks and bottles at police....that to me speaks louder than words...I have only seen the media report that the police claimed that. I have never seen them claim it independently. Could be wrong. My point is that the so called conservatives claim the media is biased against them too. Its the exact same tactic and its weak.
....it may seem like liberal bias to you, but to me it's the truth....Furthermore, while you firmly have your democrat pom poms out trying to coopt this movement to your notion of liberal. They don't support your Obama sucking either.
....the fact you'd rather argue about my supposed bias than about what I am posting says more about you...
The first quote was a direct response to what you wrote. its weak when it comes from either side. I just said I see reports that the protesters allegedly did that but no confirmation whatsoever. i may be wrong but if you want to put on the tin foil hat and claim that all of the thousands of media outlets are coopted then i am going to have to say you are completely full of .
what thousands of media outlets...most people get their news from ABC, CBS, NBC or Faux....and they have all been co-opted by the same group that has co-opted our government....playing the conspiracy hat....yeah, that's new...all of the thousands of media outlets are coopted then i am going to have to say you are completely full of .
So exactly who has co-opted them?
Not who, but what....greed, power, influence and access
Rocks and bottles
Oh so now human emotions have personified into independent acting en ies?
I can go with ideas like Murdoch dominating Fox News and much of the eastern US paper press. I could even go with GE and Westinghouse having obvious desires on energy policy however i do not buy that Turner, Disney, Viacomm, Google, AP etc all collude to not show coverage of OWS.
Its stupid to make blanket comments like that when you have zero evidence. Its not a mystery who the PACs are where they are located etc. Its very clear where the problem is and what needs to be adjusted.
There are conspiracies amongst individuals. There are not conspiracies amongst ALL individuals. You just make yourself seem like you need a roll of reynolds wrap.
The videos are all the evidence I need....no M$M.....police firing on people...Its stupid to make blanket comments like that when you have zero evidence
where is your evidence again?
....it doesn't take ALL individuals...just a few powerful individuals with influence....There are conspiracies amongst individuals. There are not conspiracies amongst ALL individuals. You just make yourself seem like you need a roll of reynolds wrap.
Big trouble in little Oakland..
police clash with police..
They trespass on private property, and are stupid enough to think the police won't respond?
Even if you are right, the appropriate response to trespassing is tear gas, rubber bullets, and riot police. Got it. That makes a lot of sense. Totally fine use of taxpayer money.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
