lolwho is the only party to have a president credibly accused of rape? To have a bimbo eruption squad? To have his wife say, "he's a hard dog to keep on the porch?"
yeah, republicans are the party with women issues.
NRA said they "settled" with two women about accusations against Cain, but won't say anymore, like if the women knew each other, same office (frame job, etc), if the two accusations were close or distant in time. black women, white women?
One accusation could be BS, but two?
I know the red team only likes blow jobs when they take place in mens rooms at the airport, but you gotta get the over it.Who is the only party to have a President credibly accused of rape? To have a Bimbo Eruption Squad? To have his wife say, "he's a hard dog to keep on the porch?"
Yeah, Republicans are the party with women issues.
Last edited by baseline bum; 10-31-2011 at 08:25 PM.
What you're doing is comparing apples and oranges.
Where are the transcripts?
I very nearly died.
Someone fill me in on this?
He was chatting with a chick online, and at some point decided it would be a good idea to use google maps to get her street address using her houses's shadow.
She was understandably not impressed by this talkish tactics and ceased any contact with him.
He then came to spurs talk and made a thread about it, not understanding what went wrong.
Basically, his interactions with women is par the course with everything else in his life - ty.
"If he can hang on..."
Negatives too high, money too low. Best case scenario: flavor of the month.
Gingrich has been alright in the debates, but apart from that he more resembles a hobbyhorse than a thoroughbred. It's hard to hang on financially at the bottom of the pile.
Says the man who read up every speculation on PDF layers and image scanning.
So you think the females should have to publicly and graphically discuss how they were harassed?
In short:
He didn't do it, and if he DID do it, he surely didn't remember, and if he DID remember, it was a harmless lie about something that isn't a big deal anyways. Yeesh, get over it already people!!!
Have enough bases covered there WC?
Specifically, he did all this to point out how easily she could be found by a stranger with the amount of information she'd made available online. And then he let her know that he'd been able to track her down as a friendly warning so that she could be more careful in the future when deciding how much personal information to divulge.
The thread he started here was therefore intended not only to ask how he'd gone wrong, but also to about how ungrateful this woman had been for not thanking him.
These are small details, of course, but I feel they are important to the story.
who hasn't[?]
I remember that thread.Freaking hilarious.
You know, I forgot that I am unlike most people. You see, I don't get off at seeing other people worse off than myself. I don't like programs like reality TV. This is the stuff that pathetic people get off on.
Thank you for clarifying that. I did have good intent, but went about it wrong.
I see things come together in my mind without trying. I didn't even have to think, and I sometimes don't think about others reactions. I saw the puzzle pieces and immediately knew it was easily solved, and did so. I was then worried someone of ill intent could too.
Yes, you would be the type to be happy over someone elses suffering.I remember that thread.
Kock Bros $Bs flowing apparently illegally to Cain'tKeepItHard
The End of the Herman Cain Campaign? (It's Not What You Think)
Just hours before Politico burst forth with its explosive accusations, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel laid out a case that suggests significant illegal campaign activity on Cain's behalf by a nonprofit organization, Prosperity USA (also known as America's Prosperity Network), controlled by Block and linked to David Koch's Americans for Prosperity. As AlterNet has reported, Block, the former director of AFP's Wisconsin chapter, has long been known for playing dirty in politics.
Prosperity USA, described as a 501(c)(3) in its incorporation do ents (and which now seems to be defunct), appears to have been footing the bill for Cain campaign expenses, including a highly unusual payment of $100,000 to the right-wing Congress of Racial Equality in advance of a major speech by Cain. Daniel Bice, who writes the Journal Sentinel's No Quarter blog, reports that the payment to CRE appears to have been disbursed from $150,000 in loans raised from unnamed donors. While Bice asserts that Cain was apparently not paid for that appearance, the New Yorker's Jane Mayer this month uncovered information suggesting that Cain's speaking fees are not directly reported as such on his disclosure forms to the Federal Elections Commission, but are shielded from public view as transactions that take place between his private company and the speaker's bureau representing him. Writes Mayer:
Yet, mysteriously, Cain discloses no payments from the Washington Speakers Bureau on his federal forms. Instead, on his 2011 F.E.C. form, he lists unspecified payments of between $50,000-$100,000 to his company, the New Voice, which he describes as a “public speaking” and “publishing” en y.
http://www.alternet.org/module/printversion/152923
I don't think any of the GOP candidates for president are worse off than me. I don't think Rubin, Hillyer and Williamson were making that point either.
Discussing possible weaknesses of candidates doesn't make anyone a sadist -- on the contrary, it's part of the normal process of evaluation.
Something must've jogged his memory, b/c Cain recalled the settlement (which he attempted to minimize as "an agreement") in the middle of his interview with Judy Woodruff last night:
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/polit...ain_10-31.htmlI was not. I was aware that an agreement was reached. The word "settlement" versus the word "agreement," you know, I'm not sure what they called it. I know that there was some sort of agreement, but because it ended up being minimal, they didn't have to bring it to me. My general counsel and the head of human resources had the authority to resolve this thing. So it wasn't one of those things where it got above a certain authority level and I had to sign it. If I did -- and I don't think I did -- I don't even remember signing it because it was minimal in terms of what the agreement was.
A Politico report says two female employees left their jobs at the National Restaurant Association in the late 1990s after accusing the president and CEO — now a Republican front-runner — of sexually inappropriate behavior. The women accepted five-figure settlements in return for a pledge not to discuss their allegations.
Anybody who's read the news accounts knows Cain is blowing smoke by chalking them up to "two anonymous sources." Politico has done its homework. Reporters interviewed "a lengthy roster of former board members, current and past staff" over the course of several weeks, then spent 10 days trying to get a response from the candidate before running the story.
Politico says it isn't publishing the women's names out of respect for their privacy. But they aren't phantoms. Politico knows who they are, and so does Cain.
This situation reflects poorly on the National Restaurant Association, which was headed by Cain from 1996 to 1999. Among the few named sources in the piece are three who were top officers of the board of directors during that time. All of them said they had never heard about the sexual harassment claims, even though settlements were paid.
The board didn't know, Cain didn't know. … Something's not adding up.
One unnamed board member did know about at least one of the settlements. "What I took offense at was that it was clear that rather than deal with the issue, there was an effort to hush it up," the former board member told Politico.
http://mobile.chicagotribune.com/p.p...%3D0%26DPL%3D3
He's changed his response too many times but he has a 0-0-0 chance of winning the nomination anyhow. Just more drama for his next book tour and his talk show.
You stalked the out of someone, she turned and burned, you asked for advice on a troll ridden sports website.
Your pain is the last thing on the list of these that is funny.
Schadenfreude is the greatest pleasure life can offer. And you can't say you didn't bring it upon yourself.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote