Reply With Quote
if he starts saying sheeeeeeeeiiit, im gonna lose my mind. just about the closest thing ive seen to a real clay davis.
That was WC that stalked her?
if he starts saying sheeeeeeeeiiit, im gonna lose my mind. just about the closest thing ive seen to a real clay davis.
Wow...
Your mind really is twisted to get that wrong.
No restraining order no stalk right?
We have the transcript.
Enlighten me. What did I say that was wrong?
You stalked her - check.
She extricated herself from your life - check.
You asked for dating advice on SPURSTALK (which I might add earlier tonight had many posters talking about how they support severe emotional/physical child abuse) - check.
Actually the latter might be the most humorous thing about the entire situation. Your resulting confusion would earn my sympathy if you didn't talk like you were omniscient in this forum, which is rather ironic considering you clearly don't understand even basic mores of interaction with the opposite gender.
False.
I let her know it could happen.
It didn't matter. I didn't know her well enough. If I pursued in trying, that would be stalking.
I don't recall asking for that. I believe I was asking if there was a way to correct the situation. That's not dating advice.
You are pathetic not to be able to understand the actual facts, or real evil in you hatred of me to try to use something you think will hurt me.
Why are you so focused on something that was what? Maybe 3 years ago?
You must have a real pathetic life if you have to find ways to make others look worse than yours.
I did something for the first time and wish I used more caution in the process. I used MySpace to look up matches for dating. I had a few interesting returns, replies, and dinners out of the deal. However, I had one experience I regret. One person I found that I started chatting with, I really liked. She appears to be my intellectual equal, and make more money than I do. After going though her photo's for the second time, I noticed one of her new house had the number clearly visible. That alone wouldn't be much, but her city was Gresham Oregon which is maybe only 75,000 population. It was a flag lot which there aren't many of. The photos clearly indicated they were clearly taken within a short time of the summer solstices and close to noon, because if the angle of the shade. Because of this, I knew the orientation of her driveway was in the general direction of north. It was obvious she would be easy to find. I wanted to warn her this was a photo to remove, so I did. Since people have a hard time believing my capabilities, I went to Google Maps satellite view, and found her house in under ten minutes. Probably three or four. I then mailed her with the request she remove the picture with the house number and sent the satellite link showing her property too.
Guess what. She freaked. I guess that's understandable, but now she doesn't want anything to do with me. Here I am looking out for her, and get bit for doing what I thought was the right thing to do. At least she removed the photo. I wish I handled it differently. Warning her that it could be done, then when she didn't believe me, find her house and show her. For me, it was a game. I like solving puzzles. In the end, it doesn't matter. She's not good enough for me is she's going to be so judgmental.
http://andrewsullivan.thedailybeast....ther-this.htmlIf no extra details are provided... it's currently a win for Cain. He has been able to play the race card, the faith card, and the liberal media card. Each one looks like an ace to the base.
I think Cain can weather this but his response has been clumsy and amateurish. When you start parsing words between "settlement" and "agreement" it certainly doesn't look Presidential.
one of the paid-off-to-STFU women is trying to get a waiver of her STFU agreement so she can defend herself against CainIsNotAble's LIES.
Naturally Boutons assumes the black man is a liar.
While you suggest typical food stamp recipients are lazy, venal, en led minorities.
nm
Cain'tWin is lying.
He's trying hard to be a politician, and they all lie, no matter the skin.
Two women were paid off with a year's salary to STFU.
Cain's telling big BLACK lies.
I didn't know severance pay was the same as a settlement. Lean something new everyday:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/lawyer-cain-accuser-wants-to-talk-but-is-barred-by-agreement/2011/11/01/gIQA0bOIdM_story.html
Amid harassment furor, Cain visits Capitol Hill
she wants them to wave the confidentiality clause.
you think they should let her talk?
If you choose to accept a severance over suing for sexual harassment, that would certainly qualify as a settlement, one would think.
The bigger question is why anyone continues to feel bound by the confidentiality covenant when others are clearly willing to discuss the specific terms of the settlement with the media. If the National Restaurant Association is truly insistent upon the need to keep this confidential, I'd expect that it will soon be filing suit against the person or persons who have breached that provision -- and someone must have for us to know amounts or other general details.
that provision would only apply to the women, don't you think?
Sure, if she also waves the legal gag order on why she was let go. Employers normally cannot say why they fired an employee.
highly unlikely that these women would have a problem with that.
We can only guess of the details at this point, but what if she was let go for bringing up a false claim? What if severance was simply normal? What if they told her they could let her go without severance, and if she fought it, she would get none, including repeating remarks they disagreed with?
I'm sorry, but I don't buy the sexual harassment thing. If there was a real case here, five figures is small. When the story broke, I was thinking severance, but the articles were worded in ways I knew you guys would simply laugh at me if I brought it up. Now it seems more reasonable since it's actually been reported that way. What else will be revealed in upcoming days?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
