Reply With Quote
DoK/mono/any other Pats fan that's not re ed
would you guys be down for them to sign TO?
DoK/mono/any other Pats fan that's not re ed
would you guys be down for them to sign TO?
Tough one but probably yes. They sure as aren't winning a superbowl with this cheese group of receivers, so I'll take the 2% chance T.O. plays hard and doesn't cause any problems over the 0% chance they win a superbowl with Wes Welker as the stud receiver.
Bringing back Moss with whatever it takes is a much better alternative, but I'll take T.O. over the alternative of standing pat with what they have. They had a nice little gimmicky run right after the Moss trade where teams were still defending the deep ball as if New England still had a deep ball threat, but their offense has been exposed now and every team knows to crowd the LOS and bring the safeties up.
Isn't there at least one other receiver other than TO and Moss on the market?I'd hate to root for TO. I'd be fine if Moss came back, I just don't think BB would let it happen.
Yeah, another WR is gonna improve the Pats' D
Yeah it's re ed to be so stubborn and not give Moss a call.
Then again, this is the same dumb who has refused to draft a pass rusher in the 1st round and thought Derrick Burgess/Tully Banta Cain/Jermaine Cunningham was the answer.
I think his love of the nickel sub is killing us too. In theory it makes sense; passing is much more important to defend than rushing. But we get no pass rush in that package, and our 1 and 2 cornerbacks aren't good enough, let alone our 3rd, 4th and 5th.
Just reading an article now, and Tracy White was on the field for the final play.
Who the is Tracy White?
Wes welker is just doing what a welker does.
No moss needed.
catching a bunch of pointless 5 yard passes?
Why are people hating on The Natural? Hes definitely not a part of the problem.
Pats are 5-3, and would have won yesterday if they took their time on the last drive and left NY less clock to respond with. Thats on the coaching.
Welker isn't the problem, he's just not the solution either. Brady over-relying on Welker has been a problem for a few years now, and not having Moss anymore makes it worse.
I'll buy that Brady needs a deep threat. But imo hes relying a lot more on his TEs this year than Welker, based on the couple of Pats games I've watched, especially in the red zone.
don't know what NE games you are watching, tbh
Being top five in almost every offensive category is a problem?
you sound like gnsf griping about Bonner shooting too many threes.
and the Pats are 4th best at getting a TD in the red zone this year at a 64% clip.
Pretty damn efficient.
They score well when they get the opportunity; they just didn't move the ball as well within the 20's yesterday until later in the game.
Left NY way too much time on the last drive.
what was stupid there was the Woodhead run outside on 1st down after the 2 minute warning where they pushed him out of bounds. Saved NY at least 20 seconds right there.
lol Techfan circle jerk about their golden white boy who chokes in big games not being a problem
Welker would be irrelevant without the best slot receiver offense in the history of the NFL. He's at this point the most overrated player in the NFL.
http://espn.go.com/nfl/team/stats/_/...gland-patriots
Wes Welker 92 targets
The next highest guy (Gronkowski) 62 targets.
If "in your opinion" Brady isn't over relying on Welker by targeting Welker 30 in more times than any other receiver or tight end, then "your opinion" is pretty in re ed.
Overrated Brady needs Moss.
Considering "TEs" has an s on the end(making it plural, as in more than one), and both TEs have combined for more targets than Welker, id say that makes you the re .
So the fact you find two players with more combined targets than Welker (one player) means Brady isn't over relying on him? That's some of the most ed logic I've ever seen.
Hey, everyone else on the team has more combined targets than him! Obviously that means he's not being over relied on!
Any team expecting a 5'8" physically limited honky to be their leading receiver is over relying on him. When he has 30 more targets than anyone else on the team, it's even worse. Welker will never be the 1st or 2nd on a superbowl team in targets. He's a 3rd option at best.
Hey,
They have a deep as group of corners if they're all healthy. Bodden and McCourty as the starting corners, probably Darius Butler as the nickel corner, and Arrington/Ras-I Dowling/Wilhite as the other corners.
Their safeties are the issue since Meriweather is a moron and Pat Chung sucks in coverage.
Yeah um I already pointed out how re ed det was
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
