Results 1 to 22 of 22
  1. #1
    Omax JsnSA's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    324
    Considering the core of our team is getting up there in age, do you think the fact that we will have a shortened season (if any) may actually help our chances?

    It seems like the last few years we keep having guys break down by the time the playoffs come around. Perhaps this will give us a chance for one more asterisk? If so I'll take it.

  2. #2
    俺はまんこが大好きなんだよ baseline bum's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    97,883
    No, the Spurs' age will be a big problem if the league starts having back-to-back-to-back games like they did in 1999. Do you remember how spent the Jazz were by May that year?

  3. #3
    俺はまんこが大好きなんだよ baseline bum's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    97,883
    Although I guess you could make the argument that a 50 game season would indirectly help them since it would lead to a worse record than in a full season, and thus a better pick in a stacked 2012 draft.

  4. #4
    Don't believe the hype... ChuckD's Avatar
    My Team
    New York Knicks
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Post Count
    4,510
    No, the Spurs' age will be a big problem if the league starts having back-to-back-to-back games like they did in 1999. Do you remember how spent the Jazz were by May that year?
    Exactly. While the 99 team was old, they had a VERY young superstar quality Tim Duncan to lean into.

  5. #5
    Got Woke? DMC's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Post Count
    90,829
    I don't think it will help us.

    If the playoffs started next week, we would be out in the 1st round again because we likely won't make the transition back to being a defense first squad, and that's because we "did so good" in the regular season last year. Surely someone will spin it that way in the front office.

  6. #6
    Veteran spurs1990's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Post Count
    4,165
    I need either Kobe or the Heat to win the astrisk le this season. That would be epic for all time.

  7. #7
    O & 44!!! Now, go back &
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Post Count
    35,170
    I need either Kobe or the Heat to win the astrisk le this season.
    I'll settle for the former.

  8. #8
    O & 44!!! Now, go back &
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Post Count
    35,170
    Exactly. While the 99 team was old, they had a VERY young superstar quality Tim Duncan to lean into.
    He's just the bag now.

  9. #9
    Veteran weebo's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    5,512
    The only way this lockout helps the Spurs is that it keeps Bonner and from wearing a Spur's uniform.

  10. #10
    Spur-taaaa TDMVPDPOY's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Post Count
    41,384
    if this helps holt to recover his losses from last season by not payin this season, why not?

    no season, means duncans contract goes of the books since its expiring

    12/13 season draft lottery if all teams have equal chance of landing 1st pick...

    if theres amnesty, get rid of rj

    SPURS REBUILDING!!!

  11. #11
    Banned Stalin's Avatar
    My Team
    Miami Heat
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Post Count
    3,786
    yes

  12. #12
    Veteran Sean Cagney's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Post Count
    13,402
    He's just the bag now.
    Do you ever say anything different or are you just senile now?

  13. #13
    Believe. Fabbs's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Post Count
    15,577
    Do you ever say anything different or are you just senile now?
    He's getting ready for his new job assignment.
    Stay tuned.

  14. #14
    Cinco TimmehC's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Post Count
    1,499
    no. The best player in fanchise history was in just his second year, while the more established teams' stars were all older, causing them to be gassed at the end of a compressed season. Everyone else did their part too, but they were greatly helped by the fact that Timmy was young enough to handle it with no problems. Manu and Timmy would not be able to handle a compressed season very well at this point in their careers.

    Edit: Holt and Buford's recent behavior also doesn't help our cause with free agents.

  15. #15
    O & 44!!! Now, go back &
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Post Count
    35,170
    ...the thought of Neal bendin' their womenfolk over the water cooler doesn't help either.

    tee, hee.

  16. #16
    Veteran
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Post Count
    781
    If there is an actual season this year (1/2 season) then yes the lockout helps both the Spurs and Mavs because we are old. 40 games is a lot easier on the body then 80 when you are old.

    Conversely it hurts the younger teams like OKC because their legs aren't as tired after 82 games.

    But it will mean that every game is at a premium if there is only a 40-50 game regular season.

    Dear Santa, bring us a labor agreement!

  17. #17
    i hunt fenced animals clambake's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    25,321
    eh, just another asterisk year.

  18. #18
    Cinco TimmehC's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Post Count
    1,499
    ...the thought of Neal bendin' their womenfolk over the water cooler doesn't help either.

    tee, hee.
    How do you feel about Mr. Pearce gettin' bent over the water cooler last night, Cully?

  19. #19
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Post Count
    6,778
    I don't think it will help us.

    If the playoffs started next week, we would be out in the 1st round again because we likely won't make the transition back to being a defense first squad, and that's because we "did so good" in the regular season last year. Surely someone will spin it that way in the front office.
    I agree the only way to get back to winning is improving the defense. Defense gives you more consistency than offense because shots don't always fall. Plus defense can fuel your offense of steals and turnovers. The Spurs had the number one offensive efficiency even with the offense faltering towards the end. Assuming they can maintain and improve the offense slightly, if they just improve their defensive efficiency they can definitely win it all. In fact I think if Anderson and Splitter had played more last season they would have helped the defense more.

  20. #20
    Veteran Sean Cagney's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Post Count
    13,402
    eh, just another asterisk year.
    Still got three more les than your team does bro, good joke though.

  21. #21
    Chopper Ed Helicopter Jones's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    14,068
    No, the Spurs' age will be a big problem if the league starts having back-to-back-to-back games like they did in 1999. Do you remember how spent the Jazz were by May that year?
    This.

    Give the Spurs a FIBA tournament-type season and I think their chances of getting the gold are pretty good.

  22. #22
    Got Woke? DMC's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Post Count
    90,829
    I agree the only way to get back to winning is improving the defense. Defense gives you more consistency than offense because shots don't always fall. Plus defense can fuel your offense of steals and turnovers. The Spurs had the number one offensive efficiency even with the offense faltering towards the end. Assuming they can maintain and improve the offense slightly, if they just improve their defensive efficiency they can definitely win it all. In fact I think if Anderson and Splitter had played more last season they would have helped the defense more.
    They won't be able to maintain the offense and improve the defense at the same time. That's because their scheme was an offensive scheme and their players were mostly scorers.

    The Spurs would need to slow it down and have the PG distribute the ball into the paint more, but with Tim aging and Tiago once again not seeing training camp, my vote goes toward the repeat of last season.

    Everyone in the NBA except the Suns learned something from the Suns' up tempo offense; it sells tickets, and if you don't have the firepower and defenses to legitimately challenge for the le, you might as well entertain the crowd.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •