so which one are you?
^Good morning, darling.
P.S., darling:::your Nash quit as well. You've nary room.
was that the season that he went on national radio crying to be traded or was the next one?
Your Rodman did likewise. You've nary room.
Rodman was not the leader or the franchise player of any team
The next one tbh
That's neither here nor there. Rodman sabotaged your team in the middle of a playoff run as a calcuated act of vengeance against the team & Robinson for attempting to proselytize him.
You've no room. I got ya, daddy-O.
I got you as well by those little short hairs, sassafras:::your Nash didn't like Porter so Nash quit, refused to put forth an honest day's work & effort for his pay. Yeah, Nash quit, just like that. Made my day. Gave me a fresh foothold from which to launch my many & varied diatribes.
Nash quit. Big shot. White man from town quit.
Lunch?
and what was Kobe reason for quitting on his team? Stay with your old trick of repeating posts you're only good at that
Because Kobe is spoiled, petty, small and short sighted.
I bear my stains & crosses in public. I've no problem with that. It's my religion.
Everyone else will do likewise.
I know this is a troll thread, but it's laughable that there really are people who do consider a career with 4 les, 6 trips to the Finals, 1 MVP (should really be 3 tbh), and 3 Finals MVPs to be an underachievement.
Well this is vs LBJ, not people like AI
Shaq was gifted with size, strength and a surprising amount of speed when he was in better shape. He didn't have good work ethic and consequently never fulfilled his true potential, as unstoppable as he was, he had plenty of room to improve during his prime.
The fact that he achieved a lot already doesn't change the fact that he could have achieved a lot more. He didn't do everything he could have, so he underachieved.
LeBron improves season after season, works hard (post-2008) and is doing everything to achieve what he can. Thing is, he has zero capability in leading a team and is afraid of failure. Those are things he really can't do much about, except taking on the role he would be good at: as a Pippen. If he goes throughout his career trying to be a leader and failing, he will be the greater underachiever. He could be the GOAT 2nd banana, without having to worry about leading a team or taking the last shot, he will truly blossom.
For now, Shaq has more on his plate in underachieving. If LBJ doesn't ring by 30, then the tables turn.
Shaq has rings, LBJ doesn't. Makes the answer pretty obvious to me.
Lakaluva
So you have to steal another person's ty shtick because your posts are so much more ty that you cannot get any play.Now that was funny. So is this:
Kobe: 5 (not done)
Shaq: 4 (done)
Got it.
Translation:
Shaq always played with someone who would not pass the ball at the end of games.
You couldn't trust him to make a free throw. Daddy was flawed.
He's not the reason the Lakers lost in 2004. I don't recall Shaq flying back and forth from a Colorado court room between games.
When 'seppe is in severe damage control, you know you struck a nerve... well done
This is one of the most ridiculous things I have ever seen written on this forum. The guy had great footwork, had a nice baby hook, and completely overpowered everyone on the low block. What exactly did you want him to add? A three-point shot? I cannot believe Shaquille O'Neal of all players is being underrated. The only negatives to his game were guarding the pick and roll and shooting free throws. I know Laker fans are still butthurt about him forcing the trade to Miami, but cut the revisionist bull .
You say this as if I like Nash
It matters not. That's your team. You're responsible for them.
Act like somebody.
I've said Nash quit idk how many times you senile old you.
His work ethic has always been criticized since his first championship. He could have stayed in better shape, continued to work on things (such as freethrows, which he DID improve temporarily) that needed room to improve and altered his game as his body aged.
The man could have done more than he did, as great as he is, he could have done more. This is in comparison to LBJ, I think you're blowing this way out of proportion. I'm nit-picking because I think LBJ is achieving what he can; his ceiling has been placed, it's either pippen or a ringless boxscore filler.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
