Reply With Quote
Gotta take it from the champ...and maybe if your boy didnt coast at the end, he would have a win.
Just be happy he didn't hit the floor this time.
stfu u filipino
most unbiased observers will tell u that marquez deserved this fight (maybe even moreso than the second)
Gotta take it from the champ...and maybe if your boy didnt coast at the end, he would have a win.
Just be happy he didn't hit the floor this time.
hitting the floor got him a draw once... he should've done it -_-
Lol..anyways...this fight got me worried about mayweather...but let's see if mayweather grows some balls and take a fight that will pretty much have him as a favorite.
You gots are blind. Didn't you watch the fight again? Pacquiao took care of business and closed out the remaining rounds to take the win. He also landed more punches, 178-135.
If Marquez really wanted to win, counterpunching the champion isn't the way to do it. The challenger has to be the aggressor if he wants to dethrone the champion.
And LOL @ those Mexicans thinking their boy won. I know it's tough to see another border-crosser losing to the Filipino fighter, but that's just the way it is.
Pacquiao beat everyone that Mexico has to offer and when they were so close to beating him once and for all, those Mexicans still failed.
LOL Mexico. You guys sent all your best boxers and ALL OF THEM FAILED.
Pac--2
JMM-0
Amazing boxing Math by Lakaluva
The fight was close. Can't say Marquez was screwed, but it was pretty close. Don't think Marquez lost 4 rounds, but it was hard to tell. A lot of rounds looked even. The difference was PAC was more aggressive.
Anyway, think if Mayweather fights the same style as Marquez, he will win.
Fans and the boxing world was being spoiled by pacman. just because JMM was able to stand toe to toe against him doesnt mean he get robbed.
Everyone is just used to seeing pacman destroy everyone on the ring.
It was a close fight but pacman was the aggressor all night, everyone knows the judges will favor the aggressor.
Give me a ing break. I'm a huge Pacquiao fan, but the shots he was landing were . He needs to get the out of congress, because he's looked lousy ever since getting elected. I know boxing needs Mayweather/Pacquiao to happen, but to rob a legend in what might have been the greatest night of his career is sickening.
In that case marquez clearly won the first 2 fights since he landed more than pac.
If fights are judged based on being the aggressor how the is Floyd still undefeated?
And LOL @ those Mexicans thinking their boy won. I know it's tough to see another border-crosser losing to the Filipino fighter, but that's just the way it is.
Pacquiao beat everyone that Mexico has to offer and when they were so close to beating him once and for all, those Mexicans still failed.
+ Marquez embarrassing his ass 3 times now.
Close fight. I could see a Marquez decision juts as I could understand scoring it for Pacquiao. I had it a draw. Marquez didn't do enough to win and constantly backing up from a champ is never a way to take a belt from him unless you slow him down. He never stopped Manny from moving forward for 95% of the fight.
Can't counterpunch your way to a belt unless you do it a lot more effectively.
Tell that to Marvin Hagler.. Judges rewarded Sugar A-Hole Leonard for pitter pattering at the end of rounds and being on his bike for 12 rds in 1987..
I have not seen the fight yet but in 3 close fights the judges could have given JMM one of them for 's sake. We know Manny is the money man but JMM fought 36 rds against this guy and has nothing to show for it judges..
Proffesional Boxers opinion:
SUPERJUDAH ZAB JUDAH 5x Champ!
Robbery!!!!
andreward Andre S.O.G. Ward
Marquez won this fight, period!!
jeanpascalchamp Jean Pascal
On my card Marquez WON!!!!
AmirKingKhan Amir Khan
Look mayb a good draw or marquez by 1-2 rounds.
PaulMalignaggi Paulie Malignaggi
Dont ask me about the fight I will not give you my opinion except that I thought Marquez won #tk!
AndreBerto Andre Berto
Smh WOW..... Come on u know Top Rank wasn't gonna let Marquez **** the money up!!! Great fight though
RealJoeCalzaghe Joe Calzaghe
Just watched Marquez v Pacman and have to say thought Marquez was robbed! Thought he won the first 2 fights also!
ChrisArreola Chris Arreola
Marquez won, true champ. Let's see Mayweather-Pacquiao. ****.
DarrenBarker82 Darren barker
Just watched the fight Jmm won that in my eyes clearly!
andredirrell Andre Dirrell
I really think so! But its so hard 2 sayRT @serhandayi7: @andredirrell JMM had a great night.....he'll always be a style problem for Pac
jcchavezjr1 Julio Cesar Chavez
Gano marquez hoy. Fue un robo juan manuel gano claramente. esto esto es malo para el boxeo. Saludo a todos
SUGARRAYLEONARD Sugar Ray Leonard
The fight against Manny vs Marquez surprised everyone except Marquez! What a display of mental, spiritual and physical training of a boxer!
_FernandoVargas FerozFernandoVargas
MARQUEZ 8 - 4!!!!!! THEY BETTER NOT ROB MARQUEZ!!!!
THEREALBHOP BERNARD HOPKINS EX
@FloydMayweather blow thru @MannyPacquiao easy!!
TheArtistPerez Michael Angelo Perez
If I was #Marquez I'll be holding my head high , cause the whole world know he won. **** what the judges say.
1Babybull Juan Diaz
Great fight for the boxung fans but bad decision by the judges
We all know Top Rank wasn't going to let their cash cow lose. Kellerman kept reminding us that he has a 100 million dollar deal on the table for his next fight.
When watching the replay, you will see that pacman will unleash a flurry of attacks, Marquez will throw the last punch before the fighters separate since he's a counterpuncher. This last punch will be the one which will register in the viewers minds and not those in between.
The judges have a different eye...thank god for that.
Only reason the world thinks he got robbed is because there were more mexicans in the arena and of course they will boo the out of pacman because he's the opponent. They might have also probably swayed the JMM entourage into thinking they were ahead.
Pacman threw and landed more punches. This will be proven in the replays and media and every boxing afficionado will be able see why pacman is clearly the winner.
Just because he lets his hands go doesn't mean he's being effective. Marquez countering his ass all night making him look like a fool.
A prominent SI boxing columnist had it at a draw:
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/201...&sct=hp_t13_a5
I don't see how such a close fight that many boxing fans list as a draw is "robbery" if the victory is given to the champ. That's how boxing has been since it's been televised.
I had it a draw because Marquez hardly ever actually fought with Manny, he seemed content to rest on his laurels and just throw here and there. It would be one thing if these guys were on the undercard, but for Marquez having Manny so figured out, he certainly seemed hesitant to actually do anything except back up and throw straights. That's not how you TAKE a championship belt in my book.
Also: Since when have close rounds not gone to the champ? You want the belt? Don't leave it up to the judges. Don't even give them a choice. Dominate the fight thoroughly, or knock him the out.
Just like every other sport: If you let time go down to 10 seconds and you lose on a bad call, you can't really blame the refs, because you let it get there in the first place.
Manny threw more, landed more, and landed more power punches. They might not have been as flashy as Marquez's shots, but this is FAR from robbery. In a close fight the aggressor will almost always bear out the win, especially considering he's the champ.
Marquez threw more, landed more, and landed more power punches in the first 2 fights.
try again.
and sure you can justify a DRAW
but try and justify 116-112
If anyone is shouting robbery, it should be Pacman. Their 1st fight ended up in a draw because of a mistake by one of the judges giving him a score of 10-7 in the first round when it should have been a mandatory 10-6 because JMM fell down 3 times.
How is that so difficult to understand? If a boxer throws more and landed more punches, he should be the winner.
Everyone was counting on pacman to drop marquez so he looks like he lost because marquez was able to take the hits and dish it back.
So for fans, the only way for pacman to win is to win decisively which he wasnt able to do...but he did enough for the judges.
why are pac s so ing stupid? Marques threw and landed more punches the first 2 fights. So by your logic you're aggreeing that Marquez should've won the first 2 fights?
Compubox
The only fool here is you and your childish and immature way of discussing topics.
Just because he lets his hands go doesn't mean he's being effective. Marquez countering his ass all night making him look like a fool.
Pac s? Poochiao? Really?
Dont be an idiot, man.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions