Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Cogito Ergo Sum LnGrrrR's Avatar
    My Team
    Boston Celtics
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Post Count
    22,399
    http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2011...mbs-paintball/

    On Wednesday, the Army announced that it’s in the market for a paintball system that can detect the presence and type of different explosives. The system would work by loading up projectiles with materials that advertise the presence of explosives — sort of like a litmus test for bombs — and firing them at the suspected bombs. Picture paintballing, but with a target that might really kill you.
    What do you guys think? Is it worth the investment? WC, I know you want to chime in on this one.

  2. #2
    Don't believe the hype... ChuckD's Avatar
    My Team
    New York Knicks
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Post Count
    4,510
    tbh, I've heard of much worse military R&D ideas...

  3. #3
    Rising above the Fray spursncowboys's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    7,669
    I believe they should put a pay raise with or higher than the annual inflation (deduct oil) for all enlisted side military.

  4. #4
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    Staring at goats is much more effective and credible

  5. #5
    Veteran AFBlue's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Post Count
    10,868
    I believe they should put a pay raise with or higher than the annual inflation (deduct oil) for all enlisted side military.
    This...Army programs are notoriously horribly run. They've had countless blunders in the last 25 years with investing billions and not bringing technology to the point of full-scale production and deployment. The money could be spent more effectively elsewhere.

  6. #6
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2011...mbs-paintball/


    What do you guys think? Is it worth the investment? WC, I know you want to chime in on this one.
    LOL...

    If there is a reality that it can work, I don't see a problem. Seems like a long shot to me though. I cannot form an firm opinion without seeing advancements already made in the area of direct chemical detection at such low levels.

    Tell me. Think we can detect picograms of explosives by shooting 2-1/2 ml of a chemical at it? What do we look for, a color change?

    I wonder if it's another pet project to keep some congressman's brother-in-law wealthy.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •