Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 36
  1. #1
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    As most people who work realize, for the 2011 year, Social security insurance was reduced from 6.2% to 4.2%. This has not been renewed for 2012. This means for every $5,000 we earn, we get $100 less than for this year.

    Don't you love our system?

  2. #2
    Independent DMX7's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    22,149
    I think I can survive.

  3. #3
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    Cutting SS was just another huge Obama error, tying SS to the deficit, when it has nothing to do with the deficit. And of course as a consumerism stimulus, it was useless, as the corps and banks are still sitting and $Ts in liquidity, 25M people are un/underemployed.

  4. #4
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    I think I can survive.
    Yes, I will too. I personally think the SS rate needs to be increased. I'm sure most others don't share my view. It is nice getting almost $2,000 net more this year under the 4.2% rate, but I can live without it too.

  5. #5
    Veteran scott's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    20,555
    Wouldn't it be "class warfare" to extend the SS rate reduction? Why should those who make under $110,000 get a bigger tax break than those who make over that amount?

  6. #6
    I can live with it JoeChalupa's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Post Count
    21,547
    Cutting SS was just another huge Obama error, tying SS to the deficit, when it has nothing to do with the deficit. And of course as a consumerism stimulus, it was useless, as the corps and banks are still sitting and $Ts in liquidity, 25M people are un/underemployed.
    It wasn't useless to those who saw an increase in their take home pay.

  7. #7
    Veteran scott's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    20,555
    Wouldn't it be "class warfare" to extend the SS rate reduction? Why should those who make under $110,000 get a bigger tax break than those who make over that amount?
    Anybody?

  8. #8
    Scrumtrulescent
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Post Count
    9,724
    The rate cut was nothing more than a gimmick. It's time for it to go.

  9. #9
    The D.R.A. Drachen's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    11,214
    It wasn't useless to those who saw an increase in their take home pay.
    Please don't complain if your Social Security is cut, or your age raised, etc. I thought with the dismal health of Social Security (due to borrowing by both teams) that this was a colossally stupid idea.

  10. #10
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    SS buying t-bonds is required by law, not by Dems or Repugs.

    The VRWC attack on SS is nothing but an attempt to steal Human-Americans pensions.

  11. #11
    Scrumtrulescent
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Post Count
    9,724
    SS buying t-bonds is required by law, not by Dems or Repugs.
    Who do you think makes the laws?

    The VRWC attack on SS is nothing but an attempt to steal Human-Americans pensions.
    The attack on SS is an actuarial one, not a partisan one. SS is simply a fundamentally flawed concept that will eventually fail.

  12. #12
    Scrumtrulescent
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Post Count
    9,724

  13. #13
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    "SS is simply a fundamentally flawed concept that will eventually fail"

    You Lie

    It's worked for 80 years, and will work at least for 30 more. It's easily fixed to make it indefinitely workable.

    You're a dupe for the VRWC lies, or shilling for them. Wall St wants their criminal hands on those funds, pure and simple.

  14. #14
    Scrumtrulescent
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Post Count
    9,724
    You lie. If there were an easy fix for SS, congress would have already fixed it and would be on television 24/7 bragging about what a wonderful thing they've done. Ponzi schemes fail. SS will be no different. Obama is committed to speeding up the process.

  15. #15
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    , I say raise it to 7%.
    Last edited by Wild Cobra; 11-22-2011 at 04:31 PM.

  16. #16
    The D.R.A. Drachen's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    11,214

  17. #17
    The D.R.A. Drachen's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    11,214
    As most people who work realize, for the 2011 year, Social security insurance was reduced from 6.2% to 4.2%. This has not been renewed for 2012. This means for every $5,000 we earn, we get $100 less than for this year.

    Don't you love our system?
    He, I say raise it to 7%.
    Is there a MEGA-EYE ROLL smiley?

  18. #18
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    "If there were an easy fix for SS, congress would have already fixed it"

    It's easily fixed technically:

    1. Raise the rate on everybody

    2. Lift the cap completely. ALL earned income subject to SS, than includes stock options as compensation. UCA has been using stock options as compensation to allow mgmt to pay 15% capital gains rather than earned income tax. that.

    Politically, DC is too corrupt and paralyzed to do anything for anybody but their owners.

  19. #19
    Scrumtrulescent
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Post Count
    9,724
    Since neither of those ideas have political support, there is no easy fix for SS and nothing to halt the program's demise.

  20. #20
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    the 2038 date for when SS would have to drop to 80% of payouts due reduce cash inflow is easily fixed by selling some of its T-bonds. "It's The Payees'/Retirees' Money"

    St Ronnie heavily cut taxes on the wealthy (himself) and raised SS.

    Raising SS% now will be flubberbusted by the Repugs because they WANT SS to fail and be replaced with risky Wall St casino chips.
    Last edited by boutons_deux; 11-22-2011 at 11:40 AM.

  21. #21
    on instagram, str8 flexin DUNCANownsKOBE's Avatar
    My Team
    Phoenix Suns
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Post Count
    19,109
    It wasn't useless to those who saw an increase in their take home pay.
    That increase in take home pay really stimulated the economy!

  22. #22
    Scrumtrulescent
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Post Count
    9,724
    the 2038 date for when SS would have to drop to 80% of payouts due reduce cash inflow is easily fixed by selling some of its T-bonds. "It's The Payees'/Retirees' Money"

    St Ronnie heavily cut taxes on the wealthy (himself) and raised SS.

    Raising SS% now will be flubberbusted the Repugs because they want SS to fail and be replaced with risky Wall St casino chips.
    The 2038 date (which is actually 2036 per the latest SSA trustees report) includes selling off all of SS's T-bonds.

    And then there's the problem of where the Treasury is going to get the $10 trillion dollars to pay off those T-bonds.

  23. #23
    Live by what you Speak. DarkReign's Avatar
    My Team
    Detroit Pistons
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    10,571
    Me, Im ready.

    Do it to it.

  24. #24
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    "Treasury is going to get the $10 trillion dollars to pay off those T-bonds."

    Found way more than $10T to bail out US and European financial sector, but retirees? 'em. We'll default on SS's t-bonds.

    They're just meaningless, worthless IOUs (CC et Friends).
    Last edited by boutons_deux; 11-22-2011 at 03:40 PM.

  25. #25
    00 06 12 13 20 21 32 44 5 bus driver's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    2,920
    i am poor so what is 0-1000?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •