Reply With Quote
sucker, go suck a BigAg chicken wing.
Boutons, you are so full of . Half the time, I have no clue what you're even talking about with all your made up acronyms and nut catch phrases. Today, you decided to throw out some bull about chicken wings.
You need to back that up with some links or references or something.Originally Posted by boutons_deux
the perfect example of marketing success in selling low quality animal parts to suckers is chicken wings. Dcades ago, breasts were best, then legs, but wings weren't even on the family table, or were the pieces you fought NOT to get stuck with.
Now consumers have been suckered into eating chicken wings that used to be discarded or ground up and fed to animals.
It sounds like total crap you made up in your conspiracy fantasy world.
It's hard to find much information on the history of chicken wings pre Buffalo Wings but I found the following:
http://ezinearticles.com/?The-Histor...ngs&id=6040447
This is a far ing cry from being ground up or served to animals.As long as there have been chickens, people have been eating chicken wings. In England during the early 1800s chicken wings were considered a delicacy. A story has passed down that Sir Walter Scott Byron attended a meal at which he became disappointed because the woman were served first and ate all the wings, leaving the men with drumsticks and other less delicate parts of the bird.
Chicken wings were not just for the upper class, though. In America, they were a common food at picnics and other social gatherings, and in the 1920s chicken wings were even served to schoolchildren as an economical yet healthy lunch choice. A dish with baked wings smothered in a y sauce was advertised in local newspapers in the 1950s, proving that chicken wings were suitable for home-cooked family meals.
While many people were cooking wings at home, restaurants were less likely to offer them as a menu selection. This was most likely because only about 20% of the weight of the wing is actually meat so it was considered more hassle than it was worth. Many chefs either threw the wings out as waste or, more commonly, used the wings to make chicken stock. In 1964, however, the fate of the wing was about to change.
So I don't know if this guy that wrote it is an expert or what. But I think your are a ing bat nutjob. If I'm wrong about chicken wings than I'm sorry and go yourself. And if you're a troll, then well done.
sucker, go suck a BigAg chicken wing.
LMAO. So, it is "well done" then.
Barbacoa!!!
If "yo grandmama" piled up a big plate of breast, legs, and wings, which body parts would be the last one lying around?
If BigAg's marketing set a big plate of nothing but tarted-up chicken wings, you suck it up.
so no backup for "chicken wings that used to be discarded or ground up and fed to animals."
fajitas, pigs feet, chitlins
I like fajitas
can you google?
20 Tons Of Agriprocessors Chicken Wings Feed Zoo Animals
http://failedmessiah.typepad.com/fai...imals-123.html
etc, etc, etc.
Cay you read????
Your original statement was that chickeng wings have been undesirable for decades and that in the past were discarded. You still haven't backed that up.
Nothnig from the article supports anything you said.
Around 41,000 pounds of frozen chicken wings - unable to be sold, but still OK for animal consumption - were saved from the landfill by Iowa Waste Exchange and given to the Cricket Hollow Zoo in Manchester.
Ben Kvigne, an Iowa Waste Exchange representative with the Iowa Northland Regional Council of Governments in Waterloo, said it's his job to work with business and individuals to find creative ways of saving byproducts and scrap material from going into the ground.
But 20 tons of chicken wings? That was a new one.
"This is a little bit unusual," Kvigne said. "It's just a little bit more interesting than the common, everyday waste material we run across."
discarded to zoo animals
chicken wings is on same level as Deep South chitlins, tripe.
scoot away, sonny, you're annoying.
I don't think boutons has ever really been taken seriously. It didn't take me long to realize that a boutons' post wasn't worth reading. It's so much simpler to scroll right past.
LMAO. I get it now. You're proven wrong and don't want to admit it and don't want it to be brought up anymore.
Yeah, I think I've been trolled big time and yet I keep getting sucked back in the Great Right Wing Chicken Wing Conspiracy.
I just showed chicken wings to zoo feed. Want me to find more?
sweetened BBQ sauce on a corporate turd, and you Americans will suck it down, just like cows eat any old they're fed.
LMAO "More"? You haven't found any. I'm like 99% sure you're just ing with me but the 1% won't let me stop. It's torture.
Originally Posted by boutons_deux
the perfect example of marketing success in selling low quality animal parts to suckers is chicken wings. Dcades ago, breasts were best, then legs, but wings weren't even on the family table, or were the pieces you fought NOT to get stuck with.
Now consumers have been suckered into eating chicken wings that used to be discarded or ground up and fed to animals.
Your sig
lol it's hilarious
If you chose to spend at least 4 years of your prime learning years studying "Hispanic Transgender Gay and Lesbian Studies"...you fully deserve that 96k of debt, if not more.
Hes actually right though, before buffalo wings, wings were considered the bad part or the animal. Now Pluckers has the in' nerve to charge $14 for a plate of 20......
et tu Bill?
No doubt I'd rather have a breast than a wing but to say that they weren't even put on the table but instead ground up for animals is total bull .
this thread is like a roasted pig
ctoa thinks he can damage Le Grand Boutons. The anklebiter dreams, buzz away, insect.
fly fly away bird with the icarus wings until the sun melts those insect wings and you fall into the ocean of ranch dressing
Many things increase in price as their popularity increases.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
