Kobe has got a heart,,,Phil came back, hat in hand, tail tucked, brow beaten, lower than skunk , looking for a hand down.
They could have won 8 during the same time period.
Kobe is not the reason the Lakers won 3 in a row.
He's been a cancer. He ran off Phil and Shaq. Both wrote bad things about him, both showing him as the same selfish asshole.Has he been an asshole in the past ? Yes. Did he cost the team a le or 2? Possibly. I think we could of won in 2004 if he didn't play so ty. But to say he's been a cancer is laughable tbh.
The Lakers could have put the Bulls run to shame. It won't happen again for years if ever. Shaq doesn't come along every few years, but Kobe does.
Say that to that young lady in Denver.
Yes, could have. Not to be now though, Kobe (sounds a lot like Culby eh?) ed that pooch right in the ter.
Kobe's got a heart-on.
That one she would agree with.
Your Neal raped. You've no room.
"could have" is weak . I won't do it. No. I'm better than that. A damn sight better.
1. Neal didn't.
2. "made in espn" did. Now your claiming he has a heart.
Yes. Neal did rape.
His expensive lawyer must have saved him.
I've seen you lament over what could have been. Don't pretend you haven't. Don't make me go digging.
The way the Mavs raped the Lakers in 2011
1. 8 in a row? This isn't the 60's. 4-5 maybe
2. Kobe wasn't the sole reason the Lakers won 3 in a row, yes i agree. Rings are a team accomplishment. But he was a extremely important player for those teams obviously, they don't win it without him. That's not debatable, trolling aside.
3. He's not the highest of character like i said, but again i don't get how he's a "cancer". And Shaq and Phil trashing him in books, doesn't reflect well on them either btw.
4. Typical over the top Kobe hating nonsense. Kobe is a dime a dozen. etc etc.No one touches prime Shaq, however. No one will ever be as dominant imo.
"The way the Mavs raped the Lakers in 2011"
^You got no room. Not after The Skunker & 8, you don't.
Similar to the way Baby Gasol raped Duncan in 2011.
Hyperbole is the most common form of fallacious rebuttal. Good to see you keep that tradition going.1. 8 in a row? This isn't the 60's. 4-5 maybe
2. Kobe wasn't the sole reason the Lakers won 3 in a row, yes i agree. Rings are a team accomplishment. But he was a extremely important player for those teams obviously, they don't win it without him. That's not debatable, trolling aside.
3. He's not the highest of character like i said, but again i don't get how he's a "cancer". And Shaq and Phil trashing him in books, doesn't reflect well on them either btw.
4. Typical over the top Kobe hating nonsense. Kobe is a dime a dozen. etc etc.
I didn't say Kobe was a dime a dozen, I said he comes along every few years. Just look at the thread le. MJ isn't coming along, but runners up are out there already. There's no runners up for Shaq, it's not even a contest. Howard is the closest thing and he's a universe away.
Shaq took Wade to a ring. Lebron didn't. Dominant bigs are much more important than flashy guards, only MJ challenged that axiom.
They should have won 5 straight, and they could have easily picked up couple after that. The compe ion wasn't that fierce.
Their window has closed, thanks to Kobe.
The Spurs weren't the defending champs.
I smell skunk
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote