Reply With Quote
Of course it does, but in what amount? You can take enough aspirin that it will kill you.
Before anyone balks at the url, they are only hosting the actual PDF of an Indian study at the University College of Sciences at Osmania University in Hyderabad, India
http://static.infowars.com/2011/12/i...atic_nerve.pdf
Of course it does, but in what amount? You can take enough aspirin that it will kill you.
1-12 ppm, someone get agloco in here to tell us what that means in relation to how much is in our water.
When you dose rats with 20 times the amount of fluoride found in typical American tap water, they get brain damage.
Call the Nobel committee!
You have a science background brah? I'd like confirmation that 1-12 ppm is "20 times the dose found in American tap water"
You didn't even read your own link.
Brah.
Twelve male Wistar rats were divided equally into two groups: one group received 20 ppm of sodium fluoride (NaF) and the other group (which served as a control) received tap water for 60days.
Why do you lie?
Brah.
I guess I was reading the part that concluded:
"High levels of fluoride in drinking water (1-12ppm)
affect central nervous system directly without first
causing the physical deformities of skeletal fluorosis6,7.
According to Mullenix et al8 hyperactivity and
cognitive deficits can be correlated with hippocampus
damage induced by sodium fluoride (NaF).
Distinctive alterations in the brain have also been
observed with the chronic administration of aluminium
Fluoride (AlF3) and NaF9. Histological
changes in the brain of young, fluoride-intoxicated
rats have been reported by Shivarajashankara10"
I fully agree no water supply should have 20ppm of fluoride.
Who still drinks straight tap water anyway? I have two brita filters because as long as I can remember we've all known the in tap water.
lol infowars
the only thing that can remove fluoride from the water is reverse osmosis which also removes everything out of it, even the minerals. if you've been drinking filtered tap water, you still got the fluoride.
Well in that case I've drank idk how much tap water and my brain works just fine tbh
tap water is for bath and washing, never knew it as a potable thing tbh
And how do you know that it didn't contribute to your ADD, or that you might otherwise have been a few IQ points smarter?
because I've had ADD since birth. ADD isn't something you get over time.
Do you have anything connection flouride to ADD or is that more bull Alex Jones sells on his listeners while he gets rich?
Where does it say Alex Jones wrote that article? It was a scientific study done by a university. Various studies have found a link, and the fact that ADD rates are so high in one of the only countries on earth who fluoridates their water is cause for concern.
Dude, last I checked ADD isn't diagnosed in infancy, only in early childhood. By then you had been drinking fluoride for a few years.
probably gained during pregnancy and later lactation imho
Do you have anything connection flouride to ADD or is that more bull Alex Jones sells on his listeners while he gets rich?
I've had ADD my entire life. It's not like AIDS, you don't pick it up. It's not like Parkinsons' disease, it's not a neurological disorder. It's a cognitive disorder.
lol all the sudden pretending you're an expert on ADD
Dude, you claim to the the expert but you're looking like the dumbass. ADD cannot possibly be diagnosed until several years of age.
Not having ADD =/= not being diagnosed. No a new born baby can't be diagnosed for ADD, that doesn't mean he doesn't have ADD.
Sigh. Dingleberry, this is from a Chinese medical journal of rather questionable methodoloy from the 1980's.
Just because they can attribute it correctly, doesn't make the ultimate source material any better.6. Shan Guan CM. The non skeletal lesions of endemic fluorosis.
Chin J Intern Med 1982; 21:217-219.
7. Ding LI. The nervous system complications of chronic
fluorosis. Chin Endem 1983; 2: 97-98.
Yeah, I knew to look there before, because I have actually read the Chinese studies. ing took me long enough to find, but the studies have never been independently verified, to my knowledge. Not really the hallmark of good science.
Correlation, meet cause, cause meet correlation. You may now go home.
I mean , ADD rates are highest in the country with the most english speakers. That must mean ADD is also caused by speaking english, right?
It couldn't possibly be because the diagnosis of ADD is a priority of that particular country's doctors, and diagnosis in other countries is not as great because of lack of training or emphasis. Skewing of data rates never happens in real life.
Nah.
Must be the flouride.
^
Doesn't that comedy video get tiresome?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
