Newt Gingrich: Serial Hypocrisy (RON PAUL VIDEO)

[Galileo]

Newt Gingrich: Serial Hypocrisy (RON PAUL VIDEO)

Paul destroys Gingrich!

WATCH CAMPAIGN AD HERE:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CWKTOCP45zY

[Galileo]

Newt Gingrich Co-Sponsored Fairness Doctrine Bill

The Fairness in Broadcasting Act of 1987 (H.R. 1934) sprung up immediately after this latter vote to try to turn the Doctrine into law. Then Georgia Congressman Newt Gingrich was one of its 71 co-sponsors.

This act is not only uncons utional and impossible to reasonbly enforce, it is also blatantly unfair to the Libertarian Party, the Cons ution Party, the Green Party, and all other third parties and independents. It is also unfair to mavericks within the two-party system.

http://race42012.com/2011/12/02/newt...doctrine-bill/

[Galileo]

NO TO NEWT!!!

See new website here:

http://www.notonewt.com/

[Galileo]

POLL: Ron Paul leads in Iowa!

Ron Paul 25%
Newt Gingrich 21%
Herman Cain 20%
Mitt Romney 15%
Rick Perry 7%
Michele Bachmann 7%
Rick Santorum 3%
Jon Huntsman 1%

http://race42012.com/2011/11/23/poll...caucus-survey/

[Galileo]

[video] Ron Paul Interview On DeFace The Nation 11/20/2011 (VIDEO)

"I just watched the Ron Paul interview (11/20) and I must say, your show couldn't have been more rude or unprofessional. Bob Schieffer is obviously biased. His twisting of Ron's policies and statements are the norm from the left, not a big deal. But when Ron went to explain what he said or what his policy is, Bob didn't accept hi...s explanation and would end the question by putting words in Ron's mouth before immediately moving on. Instead of giving Ron a final statement, Bob just thanked him and cut him off to move on to something else."

WATCH DISGUSTING VIDEO HERE:

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthr...ion-11-20-2011

[Galileo]

Newt Gingrich Caught On Video Supporting Obama And Romney Individual Healthcare Insurance Mandate (VIDEO)

WATCH SHOCKING VIDEO HERE:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=aYHSdRRLb7U

[ChumpDumper]

Newt Gingrich Caught On Video Supporting Obama And Romney Individual Healthcare Insurance Mandate (VIDEO)

WATCH SHOCKING VIDEO HERE:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=aYHSdRRLb7U

What's shocking about it?

[Wild Cobra]

What's shocking about it?

One of the few times I agree with you. I wonder if people here still think I was wrong on Gingrich reneging on the Contract with America?

[hater]

I think everyone agrees and knows Gingrich is a damn liar and in the pocket of lobbyists.

I think the question remains, do Republicans hate Barack Hussein so much that they are willing to vote this corrupt mother er in just to get rid of him?

[Wild Cobra]

I think everyone agrees and knows Gingrich is a damn liar and in the pocket of lobbyists.

I think the question remains, do Republicans hate Barack Hussein so much that they are willing to vote this corrupt mother er in just to get rid of him?

Absolutely.

Is that a serious question?

[boutons_deux]

MO TOTALLY DESTROYS NOOT



Out of Africa and Into Iowa

By MAUREEN DOWD

WASHINGTON

NEWT GINGRICH’S mind is in love with itself.

It has persuaded itself that it is brilliant when it is merely promiscuous. This is not a serious mind. Gingrich is not, to put it mildly, a systematic thinker.

His mind is a jumble, an amateurish mess lacking impulse control. He plays air guitar with ideas, producing air ideas. He ejaculates concepts, notions and theories that are as inconsistent as his behavior.

He didn’t get whiplash being a serial adulterer while impeaching another serial adulterer, a lobbyist for Freddie Mac while attacking Freddie Mac, a self-professed fiscal conservative with a whopping Tiffany’s credit line, and an anti-Communist Army brat who supported the Vietnam War but dodged it.

“Part of the question I had to ask myself,” he said in a 1985 Wall Street Journal piece about war wimps, “was what difference I would have made.”

Newt swims easily in a sea of duality and byzantine ideas that don’t add up. As The Washington Post reported on Friday, an America under President Gingrich would have two Social Security systems — “one old, one new, running side by side” — two tax systems and two versions of Medicare.

Consider his confusion of views on colonialism. In the 1971 Ph.D. dissertation he wrote at Tulane University, led “Belgian Education Policy in the Congo 1945-1960,” he is anti-anticolonialism.

“If the Congolese are to confront the future with realism they will need a solid understanding of their own past and an awareness of the good as well as the bad aspects of colonialism,” he argued. “It would be just as misleading to speak in generalities of ‘white exploitation’ as it once was to talk about ‘native backwardness.’ ”

He warned against political pressures encouraging “Black xenophobia.” What’s xenophobic about Africans wanting their oppressors to go away? It’s like saying abused wives who want their husbands to leave are anti-men.

He sees colonialism as a complicated thing with good and bad effects rather than a terrible thing with collateral benefits.

Laura Seay, an assistant professor at Morehouse College in Atlanta and an expert on Africa, blogged that Gingrich’s thesis was “kind of a glorified white man’s burden take on colonial policy that was almost certainly out of vogue in the early 1970s. Gingrich wrote this as the Black Consciousness and Black Power movements were approaching their pinnacles. It was most decidedly not the time to be arguing that white European masters did a swell job ruling black Africans through a system that ensured that most Congolese would never get a real education.”

When it comes to America’s British overlords, Gingrich is not so sympathetic. The bludgeon of American exceptionalism that he uses on President Obama was forged at Valley Forge.

In the introduction to his novel about George Washington and the Revolutionary War, “To Try Men’s Souls,” written with William R. Forstchen, Gingrich writes: “The British elites believed this was a conflict about money and about minor irritations. They simply could not believe the colonists were serious about their rights as free men and women.”

Gingrich, a radical precursor to the modern Tea Party when he staged what conservatives considered the second American Revolution in the House in the ’90s, wrote with delight of London’s shock when Samuel Adams started the original Tea Party.

But while an anticolonial disposition is good if you’re Adams, Washington and Jefferson, it’s bad if you’re Barack Obama’s Kenyan father living under British rule two centuries later.

Gingrich made one of his classic outrageous overreaches last year when he praised a Dinesh D’Souza article in Forbes, saying you could only understand how “fundamentally out of touch” and “outside our comprehension” President Obama is “if you understand Kenyan, anticolonial behavior.”

D’Souza’s absurd ad hominem theory tying Obama to his father goes like this: “This philandering, inebriated African socialist, who raged against the world for denying him the realization of his anticolonial ambitions, is now setting the nation’s agenda through the reincarnation of his dreams in his son.”

This was a typical Newt mental six-car pileup. The man who espouses Christian values being un-Christian in visiting the alleged sins of the father upon the son; the man who reveres the anticolonialism of the founding fathers ranting against the anticolonialism of the father of America’s first African-American president. How do you rail against the Evil Empire and urge overthrowing Saddam and not celebrate liberation in Africa?

Newt is like the Great White Hunter out on campaign safari, trying to bag a Mitt, an animal with ever-changing stripes. Certainly, the 68-year-old’s haughty suggestions on child labor last week in Iowa smacked of harsh paternalism and exploitation.

He expanded on ensian remarks he’d made recently at Harvard, where he said “it is tragic what we do in the poorest neighborhoods, entrapping children in child laws which are truly stupid,” adding that 9-year-olds could work as school janitors.

“Really poor children in really poor neighborhoods have no habits of working and have nobody around them who works,” he asserted in an ignorant barrage of stereotypes in Des Moines. “So they literally have no habit of showing up on Monday.”

Has he not heard of the working poor? The problem isn’t that these kids aren’t working; it’s that they don’t have time with their parents, who often toil day and night, at more than one job, and earn next to nothing.

Newt’s the kind of person whom child labor laws were created to curb. He sounds like a benign despot with a colonial subtext: Until I bring you the benefits of civilization, we will regard you as savages.

He’s Belgium. The poor are Congo.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/04/op...gewanted=print