You support regressive taxes? Business will pass the tax straight through to consumers as another cost of doing business.
That's a myth...while some costs will be passed on to customers, not all the costs will be passed on.....remember that if the price of said item gets too high, customers will just buy less of said item, so producers also have an incentive to keep prices as low as possible...or to improve their own economies of scale..
You would have to exclude a huge chunk of wages so that a flat tax was not regressive, and the flat tax would actually have to be a tiered tax which would tax higher income earners at a higher rate than lower income earners...higher income earners presumably uses more natural resources than lower income earners both in the production and consumption of resources....like it or not, the taxes you pay will have a lot to do with the damage you cause to the earth....
If all businesses are subject to the same tax then all businesses will pass the cost on, leaving no other "lower cost" options. Business taxes are just a disguised sales tax. Look at the Federal Fuel tax (on big bad oil companies) as an example. The poorest of the poor are still paying that tax.
No they won't... some businesses will always be lower than others...some products always lower quality than others and lower prices....it will be up to the free market system to decide the winners and losers..
So you are really trying to convince us that when businesses cost of doing business rises they won't pass this cost on to consumers, both rich and poor?
I want some of what you are smoking.
No, they will simply create more specialty items to attract more discriminate buyers, but they will keep the prices of cheap goods cheap to keep the lower end buyers too...they will simply attach the higher taxes on lower goods to the higher-end products for customers who are not so price sensitive...
All true. To give credit where it was due - originally there was some logic with the fuel tax, as the tax was exclusively used to pay for interstate/highway/road maintenance. A great idea; people who buy fuel use roads a roughly proportionate amount to the amount of fuel the buy.
If all businesses are subject to the same tax then all businesses will pass the cost on, leaving no other "lower cost" options. Business taxes are just a disguised sales tax. Look at the Federal Fuel tax (on big bad oil companies) as an example. The poorest of the poor are still paying that tax.
A great idea until congressmen decided to take that fuel tax money and use it for whatever the they wanted instead. Now our roads are all and it's just another sales tax.
oh bull ...
The tortilla factory will add the cost in to the price of tortillas
The bean farmer will add the cost in to the price of beans.
The chicken and egg producers will add the cost in to the price of chickens, eggs, etc.
You are dreaming if you thing business taxes aren't ultimately regressive.
Then you exempt basic food products...,,,these are adjustments now...
The whole point is that funding schools with just property taxes, and the current system, giving from rich to poor, is just contributing to tier overall schools in San Antonio...the schools are technologically still in the 1990, while the kids are in 2011...we've got to completely change the methods we use to teach our kids, not discriminate further by separating kids between good private schools and bad private schools...
And to launch my campaign I propose that all home loans be increased by one to two years, depending on the time is owed on the loan, and all home owners get a Christmas break in December of every year of their home loan...
Not entirely true. While those business "pass" the cost of a tax on, the fact we have downward sloping demand curves and upward sloping supply curves dictates that some of that cost gets absorbed by the business. The elasticity of demand and supply dictate how much of the tax each "side" pays. When you have inelastic supply, and elastic demand, then the business actually would bare the brunt of the tax increase.
If all businesses are subject to the same tax then all businesses will pass the cost on, leaving no other "lower cost" options. Business taxes are just a disguised sales tax. Look at the Federal Fuel tax (on big bad oil companies) as an example. The poorest of the poor are still paying that tax.
Here is the best illustration I could find, but the resolution isn't so great:
It is true to say "the business passes it on" - but the burden is in fact shared by both parties, the degree to which just depends on other factors.
Here is a PowerPoint presentation from a lecture on the subject.
http://faculty.riohondo.edu/mjavanma...20of%20Tax.pdf
This professor does a good job of pointing that the tax burden is independent of who "pays the tax" (which is the point you are making - that you can tax businesses, but some of the burden still falls on consumers. You just didn't consider that the burden is actually shared)
and yet we still don't have an NFL team.They don't even know what they are talking about
And there's a reason why Big Gov is here and not in other cities.
San Antonio has always been a good place to live in, going back to even Spanish colonial times. England and France have both tried to take over San Antonio from Spain and they failed. Even when Mexico briefly held control over San Antonio, Anglos couldn't stop from pouring in. I'm thinking it's the mild climate (good for agriculture) and the abundance of water ( we have a load rivers and the aquifer) that has attracted humans for Hundreds of years. And that's the reason for all the battles (of the past) and the protection that San Antonio currently has. Because of the natural resources that it has. One more thing: San Antonio is considered the most beautiful city in Texas, and the Spanish Governors palace/and the Alamo are considered the most beautiful buildings in Texas according to National Geographic. Take that Austin, Dallas, and Houston!
"it's the mild climate (good for agriculture) and the abundance of water ( we have a load rivers and the aquifer)"
this must be a be@ner shilling for Hispanic CoC
Mild climate?
abundance of water? (not enough to cool coal-plants and sell it cheap to coastal rice farmers. WTF is arid S. TX doing in the rice business?)
The untravelled be@ner seems to think the SA river, Guadaloupe, Comal, etc creeks are rivers.
Talk all the you want, yet people still move to San Antonio for reasons unknown. I have all the free water I need here. I fill up my swimming pool and my plants/animals get all the water they need. Food and cost of living is abundant and cheap here. Even poor people on food stamps here are driving Dodge chargers, have cable and internet, and smoke some of the best kill in the US. Europe might be better off on some things, but people aren't really suffering here. Yeah, they might be dumber than your average socialist-liberal European, but we are all right. I don't even like people moving here to tell you the truth.(stay in your dirty ass crowded cities) Talking all this about San Anto, yet hipster, gety pricks like you move here and gay it up."it's the mild climate (good for agriculture) and the abundance of water ( we have a load rivers and the aquifer)"
this must be a be@ner shilling for Hispanic CoC
Mild climate?
abundance of water? (not enough to cool coal-plants and sell it cheap to coastal rice farmers. WTF is arid S. TX doing in the rice business?)
The untravelled be@ner seems to think the SA river, Guadaloupe, Comal, etc creeks are rivers.
It's only a matter of timeand yet we still don't have an NFL team.
If San Antonio is so "bad"? Why don't they give the state back to Spain or Mexico, or better yet; let Texas be it's own nation again. There's a reason why big brother wants to be here and doesn't want to leave.
Lol at people still thinking that the battle of the Alamo was because of "Freedom""it's the mild climate (good for agriculture) and the abundance of water ( we have a load rivers and the aquifer)"
this must be a be@ner shilling for Hispanic CoC
Mild climate?
(bad ass weather for outdoor recreation) I only wear a t-shirt all year round.
abundance of water? (not enough to cool coal-plants and sell it cheap to coastal rice farmers. WTF is arid S. TX doing in the rice business?)
The untravelled be@ner seems to think the SA river, Guadaloupe, Comal, etc creeks are rivers.. They were really fighting for land/mineral and water rights.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
