So was anyone that watched Walter Cronkite and read Walter Duranty.
Which, by the way, was the point of the video. People do watch and think they are getting the truth and they then make decisions based on that "truth."
Lyndon Johnson knew the truth of the Tet Offensive; it was a undeniable United States military victory. Even the Communist enemy agreed. But, when Walter Cronkite declared the war unwinnable in the context of reporting on what was, by all accounts, a military victory, Johnson knew he had lost America because -- well, Cronkite was the most trusted man in America. What I didn't know at the time was, Walter Cronkite was an avowed One World Government supporter and spoke to groups, sympathetic to that cause, and spoke openly (to them) about the need for the United States people to face the fact they were going to have to give up some of their sovereignty.
Tell me, scott; would he have been the most trusted man in America if American had known that little fact?
And, Walter Duranty, well, he merely won a Pulitzer for hiding the atrocities of Stalin and deriding or mocking those, in his profession, who tried to tell the truth.
Tell me, scott; would the world have been different if Americans had known, earlier, about Stalin's millions of murders?
And, today's media is chocked full of current-day Cronkite and Duranty wannabes.
That was the point of the video.