"I don't justify losing half your total fortune, except when it involves a player I like"
another flexible religion.
Never said such.
"I don't justify losing half your total fortune, except when it involves a player I like"
another flexible religion.
Never said such.
Never said such.
Btw, this is re ed on so many levels.
1) Kobe was already sleeping around, that's why the divorce is happening. There are reports he's slept with 100+ women.
2) Because of their divorce, MJ and Shaq get to sleep around as much as they want to now, and they paid the same price Kobe paid.
3) Getting a divorce because you can't stay faithful is viewed negatively regardless. Kobe was sleeping around plenty before The Divorce happened.
Thank you.
"Gary Neal raped, even though he wasn't convicted. We should all give Sandusky the benefit of the doubt, though."
This is just like when you denied the fact you picked the Suns to win the Western Conference. You said "such" right here:
Thank you.
& when you pointed it out I concurred.
Well I just pointed it out.
& I concurred.
So you concur that Kobe losing half of his total fortune is a catastrophe?
No. I concur that I picked the Suns to come out of the Western Conference last season.
So you're denying the fact you said losing half your total fortune is a catastrophe?
Yep, as flexible as every other religion. Believe only when it is convenient for you.
, "it's a catastrophe until it happens to Kobe!"
You've nary room. Dallas beat your Heat and you cast them out, just like that.
I've reposted it with a URL multiple times. You said verbatim "Losing half your total fortune is a catastrophe" and you didn't have any qualifier in that post. You clearly said what I accused you of saying.
Thank you.
You, DoK, you put the "qualifier" on there.
Your regrets are your own.
So you're denying that you said "Losing half your total fortune is a catastrophe." without including any qualifier?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)