The part in quotes is exactly what you said, is it not?
The part in quotes is exactly what you said, is it not?
Look at the part in quotes (incase you failed 3rd grade english, the part in quotes is the part I'm quoting), did you not saying verbatim what I have in quotes?
You painted one color broad strokes before anyone else did. You specifically said the following:
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/show...7&postcount=22
There was nothing about when it was acceptable to lose half your fortune.
'Seppe has become the most easily trollable person on SpursTalk. Oh how the mighty have fallen.
Thank you.
At least since Kobe climbed on top of the bag, 5-4.
tee, hee.
I also like the "I'm not qualifying the les, just stating the facts" defense, because I know he wouldn't let it fly if one was "stating the facts" about Kobe.
Welcome Giuseppe, make yourself comfortable you're going to be here a while...
welshing on a bet is okay, but standing somebody up at the Chuckbox is unforgivable.
Thank you.
Never did such.
I look forward to the challenge with equal amounts of both anticipation & determination.
Let us proceed...
You said
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/show...7&postcount=22
because it was something that happened to MJ and Shaq but didn't happen to Kobe. Now that it's happened to Kobe, there's all the sudden situations where it's ok to lose half your total fortune.
Watching Laker fans try to cover their tracks is hilarious to say the least.
Even though he does everything he has been accused of doing in this topic, he'll try to deny it anyway because his exact wording wasn't used.
He wants Sandusky to get the benefit of the doubt, even though he didn't give Neal any.
He claims to not qualify championships, even though he has on multiple occassions.
He thinks Jordan and Shaq losing half is somehow different from Kobe losing half for no good reason.
His religion only applies when he wants it to apply.
Now watch him do what he does best: dodge posts that call him out on his re ed logic.
Never said such.
This might lead to a Rush Limbaugh debate again. Classic!
I wonder if all bandwagon fans are this defensive. I guess it makes sense.
His bandwagoning is one thing he will never defend.
Cully I swore to only chime in on these types of debates occasionally...and you've been good to me over the years so I have to speak up here...
Kobe wins..he's actually not paying half...His net worth is 300 million according to Forbes and she's only getting 75 mill...so he made out like a bandit without a Prenup...his net worth will be adjusted slightly after the payout...
what's even more glaring is that even after paying out 75 tickets to Nessa Kobe is still worth almost 100 million more (225 mill) than Tim Duncan and Peter Holt combined according to Forbes...that's astounding...( let's see if any finance majors out there)
![]()
Forbes Data on Kobe - 300 million ( less 75)
http://www.therichest.org/celebnetwo...ant-net-worth/
Forbes Data on Duncan Net worth - 75 million
http://www.therichest.org/celebnetwo...can-net-worth/
NBA Data on Peter Holt Net Worth 80 million
http://www.usatoday.com/sports/baske...ary-owners.htm
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)