Thing you would like other posters...

[Wild Cobra]

To do, or not do.

Here's one from me:

We all have little quirks, pet peeves, or what ever you wish to call it. For the umpteenth time, I came across another post that was nothing more than a link. I most often ignore such posts. WH is commonly guilty of this, so is boutons and others. I don't ask much, how about at least one wrote from the link that I can evaluate if I wish to click on the link or not... please...

Boutons, it was your post that triggered this. Since I seldom agree with you, or anything you link, why should I click on it? Is it that hard to pick out on relevant sentence or paragraph to quote?

[Wild Cobra's Surgeon]

I would like you to stop skipping treatments.

[ElNono]

[Bender]

well, I agree about the quick, drive-by postings, where there is just a link posted.

I would at least like a comment or something by the OP, to get the ball rolling.

[ChuckD]

I don't like posts that are just a complaint.

[DUNCANownsKOBE]

I would like you to stop skipping treatments.

[boutons_deux]

Wc, gfy

[Viva Las Espuelas]

Yeah. Its funny a lot of the same people that on Darrin's youtubing are guilty of that.

[cheguevara]

http://www.sbas.net/

[101A]

http://www.sbas.net/

My son consulted with a young, up and coming orthopedic surgeon before his ACL surgery last October. Dude was interning for Freddie Fu.

[101A]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freddie_Fu

[DarrinS]

I hate when people bump their own threads that are over a year old.

RG?

[Winehole23]

WH is commonly guilty of this, so is boutons and others. I don't ask much, how about at least one wrote from the link that I can evaluate if I wish to click on the link or not... please...

no sympathy, no help. why don't you click it yourself and read? surely you don't think we'll believe you have some upper limit on the time you're willing to waste here.

some sites, like Financial Times, have policies that prohibit reduplication, others imho deserve the clicks.

i'll add commentary of my own when I damn well feel like it, WC, and if anyone addresses me wrt something i've posted, i'll usually reply.

[Winehole23]

Yeah. Its funny a lot of the same people that on Darrin's youtubing are guilty of that.

lol "guilty" of contributing relevant links to discussion threads

[Winehole23]

lol white knight for WC'S pet peeves

[Oh, Gee!!]

WH also makes 5 posts to express what could be expressed with one.

[Oh, Gee!!]

that's annoying

[Oh, Gee!!]

don't you think?

[Winehole23]

there's no accounting for taste

[Winehole23]

besides, SpursTalkers often have difficulty paying attention. I believe it helps to be brief, in addition to it flat looking better on the page

[Winehole23]

I hate when people bump their own threads that are over a year old.

RG?

sometimes stories get updated.

what do you hate about it? being reminded of silly things you attempted to pass off as weighty and important a year ago?

[redzero]

there's a difference between being brief

[redzero]

and posting incomplete thoughts

[redzero]

for no real reason

[Winehole23]

splitting up sentences is foul?

so noted. I was unaware of any unspoken aesthetic canon governing submission here. I'll try to conform to it as the details are revealed to me.