Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 63
  1. #1
    right about pizzagate Blake's Avatar
    My Team
    Texas Tech Red Raiders
    Post Count
    83,638
    Imo, except I need to cut another few teams to get to 48. (4 12-team conferences)

    In no particular order, top 50+ that have reason to get in:

    1. LSU
    2. Alabama
    3. Oklahoma State
    4. Stanford
    5. Oregon
    6. Arkansas
    8. Kansas State
    9. South Carolina
    10. Wisconsin
    11. Virginia Tech
    12. Baylor
    13. Michigan
    14. Oklahoma
    15. Clemson
    16. Georgia
    17. Michigan State
    18. TCU
    19. Houston
    20. Nebraska
    22. Penn State
    23. West Virginia
    24. Texas
    25. Auburn
    26. Texas A&M
    27. Florida st
    28. BYU
    29. Georgia Tech
    30. Cal
    31. Iowa
    32. Missi St
    33. Florida
    34. Washington
    35. Ohio st
    37. Miami
    38. Arizona St
    39. NC St
    40. Pitt
    41. UCLA
    42. Illinois
    43. Tennessee
    44. Texas Tech
    45. Purdue
    46. Arizona
    47. Syracuse
    48. Boston College
    49. Washington St
    50. Kansas
    51. Oregon St
    53. Colorado
    54. Ole Miss

  2. #2
    O & 44!!! Now, go back &
    Post Count
    35,170
    You'd have to have Media spearhead such a notion, and daddy, they wouldn't do that for all the rice in China.

  3. #3
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    UTSA Roadrunners
    Post Count
    154,406
    Why would Texas Tech be included?

  4. #4
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    UTSA Roadrunners
    Post Count
    154,406

  5. #5
    right about pizzagate Blake's Avatar
    My Team
    Texas Tech Red Raiders
    Post Count
    83,638
    You'd have to have Media spearhead such a notion, and daddy, they wouldn't do that for all the rice in China.
    Nothing to do with Media.

    The impending lawsuit from the remaining 60+ schools would kill my dream before it starts

  6. #6
    right about pizzagate Blake's Avatar
    My Team
    Texas Tech Red Raiders
    Post Count
    83,638
    Why would Texas Tech be included?
    I figure if you are just one win away from being in the le game just a few years ago, I think heavy consideration should go your way if the conferences were to reform today.

    I also think enrollment, fan attendance and recent tv appearances should also be a factor.

  7. #7
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    UTSA Roadrunners
    Post Count
    154,406
    I figure if you are just one win away from being in the le game just a few years ago, I think heavy consideration should go your way if the conferences were to reform today.

    I also think enrollment, fan attendance and recent tv appearances should also be a factor.
    That's adorable.

  8. #8
    right about pizzagate Blake's Avatar
    My Team
    Texas Tech Red Raiders
    Post Count
    83,638
    Thanks

    Those were some of my own reasons, but tbh, I don't see any reason Tech wouldn't make the top 48 in the real world.

    Do you?

  9. #9
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    UTSA Roadrunners
    Post Count
    154,406
    Thanks

    Those were some of my own reasons, but tbh, I don't see any reason Tech wouldn't make the top 48 in the real world.

    Do you?
    I just think it's curious that Tech would make it over teams that have actually gone to BCS bowls.

  10. #10
    right about pizzagate Blake's Avatar
    My Team
    Texas Tech Red Raiders
    Post Count
    83,638
    I just think it's curious that Tech would make it over teams that have actually gone to BCS bowls.
    The best/ better teams don't always get to go to a BCS bowl.

    This year was no exception.

  11. #11
    Coulrophobia is Beautiful JayTheClown's Avatar
    Post Count
    1,517
    You should have added Arizona State in there so Texas Tech could have a academic partner.

  12. #12
    right about pizzagate Blake's Avatar
    My Team
    Texas Tech Red Raiders
    Post Count
    83,638
    You should have added Arizona State in there so Texas Tech could have a academic partner.
    #38

    they're in automatically because they've been in a le game that I can recall watching.

  13. #13
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    UTSA Roadrunners
    Post Count
    154,406
    The best/ better teams don't always get to go to a BCS bowl.

    This year was no exception.
    But Texas Tech was never one of those teams.

  14. #14
    right about pizzagate Blake's Avatar
    My Team
    Texas Tech Red Raiders
    Post Count
    83,638
    But Texas Tech was never one of those teams.
    2008, Tech was ranked higher in the BCS standings (#7) than Penn St, Ohio St, and Cincinnati heading into the bowl season
    Last edited by Blake; 01-10-2012 at 09:56 PM.

  15. #15
    Veteran Sisk's Avatar
    My Team
    Texas A&M Aggies
    Post Count
    6,709
    But Texas Tech was never one of those teams.
    Gosh you're an idiot.

  16. #16
    Brutus NFO's Avatar
    My Team
    Ohio State Buckeyes
    Post Count
    972
    2008, Tech was ranked higher in the BCS standings (#7) than Penn St, Ohio St, and Cincinnati heading into the bowl season
    Cincinnati was the Big East automatic bid and both Penn St and Ohio St travel significantly more than Red Raider fans, not to mention they bring more eyes to televisions than Texas Tech could ever dream of.

    The goal of the BCS was to stage a 1 vs 2 matchup, the remainder of the bowls are there to make money, and Texas Tech can't bring in anywhere near the coin the traditional schools can.

  17. #17
    right about pizzagate Blake's Avatar
    My Team
    Texas Tech Red Raiders
    Post Count
    83,638
    Cincinnati was the Big East automatic bid and both Penn St and Ohio St travel significantly more than Red Raider fans, not to mention they bring more eyes to televisions than Texas Tech could ever dream of.

    The goal of the BCS was to stage a 1 vs 2 matchup, the remainder of the bowls are there to make money, and Texas Tech can't bring in anywhere near the coin the traditional schools can.
    OU and UT were ranked higher.

    Seriously, this guy is a ing idiot.

  18. #18
    Brutus NFO's Avatar
    My Team
    Ohio State Buckeyes
    Post Count
    972
    OU and UT were ranked higher.

    Seriously, this guy is a ing idiot.
    There are a handful of ways you can guarantee a BCS bid. If Tech was ranked #7 and OU an UT were ranked higher one of them got the autoamtic bid, which was OU. Texas was ranked #3 so they were guaranteed a BCS slot. If Texas was ranked either #5 or #6 the Fiesta Bowl still would have selected Texas and Ohio State even though Tech was ranked higher than Ohio State and Texas wasn't guaranteed a BCS slot for finishing in the top 4.

    Face it dude Tech doesn't bring enough to the table to warrant an at large selection. The sooner you realize that the sooner people can stop spoon feeding you basic imformation that most 5 year olds can grasp.

    Blake continues to leave out important facts and is a complete moron. I sure hope you were looking in a mirror when you said, "guy is a freaking idiot"

    You make Sisk look like a ing genius and that is damn near impossible to do.

  19. #19
    right about pizzagate Blake's Avatar
    My Team
    Texas Tech Red Raiders
    Post Count
    83,638
    Face it dude Tech doesn't bring enough to the table to warrant an at large selection. The sooner you realize that the sooner people can stop spoon feeding you basic imformation that most 5 year olds can grasp.

    Blake continues to leave out important facts and is a complete moron. I sure hope you were looking in a mirror when you said, "guy is a freaking idiot"

    You make Sisk look like a ing genius and that is damn near impossible to do.
    Rofl.

    I have some tangible evidence that Tech would most likely have received an at-large bid to the Fiesta Bowl had UT and OU not been ahead in the rankings, taking up the two Big12 spots.

    If you would like me to confirm how much of a ing idiot you really are right in front of your face, just say the word.
    Last edited by Blake; 01-11-2012 at 09:57 AM.

  20. #20
    My Favorite Faded Fantasy The Gemini Method's Avatar
    My Team
    USC Trojans
    Post Count
    10,168
    No USC?

  21. #21
    Veteran Sisk's Avatar
    My Team
    Texas A&M Aggies
    Post Count
    6,709

    You make Sisk look like a ing genius and that is damn near impossible to do.

  22. #22
    right about pizzagate Blake's Avatar
    My Team
    Texas Tech Red Raiders
    Post Count
    83,638
    They aren't on the list?

    Shame, but I'm sure they'll dominate in the FCS.

  23. #23
    My Favorite Faded Fantasy The Gemini Method's Avatar
    My Team
    USC Trojans
    Post Count
    10,168
    They aren't on the list?

    Shame, but I'm sure they'll dominate in the FCS.
    Can't wait for those Appalachian St. vs USC barnburners!!! I may need to make a trip to Boone, NC to watch the away game!

  24. #24
    Allenhu Joshbar DeadlyDynasty's Avatar
    My Team
    Maryland Terrapins
    Post Count
    27,972
    Can't wait for those Appalachian St. vs USC barnburners!!! I may need to make a trip to Boone, NC to watch the away game!
    Fun fact: I bought a GameGear at a Pawn Shop in Boone, NC about 15 years ago. I don't know why I remember this, or why anyone would give a , but I felt it pertinent to the discussion.

  25. #25
    My Favorite Faded Fantasy The Gemini Method's Avatar
    My Team
    USC Trojans
    Post Count
    10,168
    GameGear was a nifty hand-held...if it had better marketing and development team and SEGA didn't start its notorious ADHD development, it might've spawned something bigger.

    Altered Beast on the thing was dopeness!

    I think, though, this is a great idea--maybe add somewhat of a EPL twist to it and have like the bottom quarter of teams relegated on a yearly basis...that way you'll have incentive to improve your team.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •