Reply With Quote
So your claim is that CNN is biased in favor of the Republican party.
And I don't know why they threw a tantrum at that question. Maybe you could explain.
first her admission that she is worried about Ron Paul:
then she tries to enrage Paul and they put her on her ass:
CNN: unbiased network
So your claim is that CNN is biased in favor of the Republican party.
And I don't know why they threw a tantrum at that question. Maybe you could explain.
I'm gona have to hold ur hand on this one.
- Dana Bash is a Republican
- She states Paul's success worries her
- She throws junk questions to Paul to try and piss him off and Paul puts her on her ass
Is she?
tbh I think she is saying she is talking to Republicans just like she's sure John is talking to Republicans.- She states Paul's success worries her
I can see how the more paranoid elements out there could read that awkward phrasing the way they want to. Confirmation bias and all that.
Brave Sir Ron ran away. He does that a lot.- She throws junk questions to Paul to try and piss him off and Paul puts her on her ass
Last edited by ChumpDumper; 01-11-2012 at 12:05 AM.
The more I see from Ron Paul, the more I like him. Probably the last honest politician left of the top end of the GOP (Huntsman is up there too, but he's more of a fringe candidate). I disagree with some of Paul's ideas, but at least he states them openly and plainly, and doesn't just mouthpiece the GOP byline.
No teleprompter, no written speech. Just honesty and the facts. Too frickin bad I don't agree with him on issues of poverty, which is very important to me, but then again so is honesty.
I think the media is so afraid that Ron Paul may be the next president.
it's interesting CNN did not air the whole thing. they claim to be the more responsible network but seems they are not much better than Fox since their newscasters are affiliated with different parties/groups anyway.
CNN's Dana Bash Targeted By Ron Paul Super PAC
A group of Ron Paul supporters are calling on CNN to remove the correspondent covering the candidate from her assignment, claiming that she is too biased against Paul.
Dana Bash aroused the ire of the pro-Paul brigade on Monday, when her questions to the Republican prompted his spokesman to angrily cut off an interview with her.
On Tuesday, Revolution PAC, a Super PAC dedicated to supporting Paul's candidacy, issued a press release calling for Bash to be removed from covering the campaign. The PAC cited comments Bash made earlier in January.
“I’m sure you talk to Republicans who are worried as well, just like I am, that Ron Paul will continue on long into the spring and summer," Bash said to husband and CNN colleague John King. Revolution PAC seized on the "just like I am" comment to say that Bash exhibited "strong" and "disturbing" bias against Paul.
It seems likely that Bash was telling King that, "just like" him, she was hearing from worried Republicans. Paul supporters, however, are clearly choosing a less charitable take on her words.
The attacks come as Paul is contending with a sharp increase in his media attention in the wake of his strong showing in the Iowa caucus and the New Hampshire primary.
Mess with the loons, you get the loonies!
lol included but not bolded
Nobody (media included) is afraid Ron Paul will be the next president.
"Just like I am" seems to refer back to the act of talking to worried Republicans, not an admission by Bash that she too is worried. I do agree that her comment/question about the Obama voter not being able to shake Paul's hand was stupid and irrelevant. Mr. Paul cannot possibly shake every potential voter's hand and look into her eyes to assure her that everything will be better. It's a stupid expectation on the part of the voter, and a stupid thing to bring up on the part of the reporter.
Last edited by Oh, Gee!!; 01-11-2012 at 05:36 PM.
Given the time spent in New Hampshire, it just may be possible.
and Bill Clinton was referring to Hilary when he famously said "I never had sexual relations with that woman"
OK, then: show us your do ented proof Bash and King are registered Republicans.
and Bill Clinton was referring to Hilary when he famously said "I never had sexual relations with that woman"
its not about red team blue team anymore. Corporations and military industry own both candidates for both teams Obama|Romney
Proof is there that CNN and rest of mainstream media is biased against Ron Paul. If you refuse to wake up, carry on with your eyes closed.
Proof you can't back up your claim that Bash is a Republican.
Proof is there that CNN and rest of mainstream media is biased against Ron Paul. If you refuse to wake up, carry on with your eyes closed.
Proof you're just another paranoid Paul supporter.
Real honest how he puts pork in a bill he votes against.
stfu lol
So maybe you can give us all the do ented proof Bash and King are Republicans.
lol didn't think so.
proof that she isn't
Your claim, your burden of proof.
My claim is you have no proof that she nor King are Republicans. Your inability to produce proof is proof of my claim.
Thanks for proving my claim.
in other words, you have no proof.Your claim, your burden of proof.
My claim is you have no proof that she nor King are Republicans. Your inability to produce proof is proof of my claim.
Thanks for proving my claim.
k thanks
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
