Reply With Quote
Why when democrats fight dirty ( Dirham, Hussein, and pretty boy) its a good thing but when the GOP does it, out isn't? I like it.I never thought they would be using democrat attacks but it will give Barry less to attack him on.
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com...y-in-november/
I hope this Republican primary goes on a long long time.
Why when democrats fight dirty ( Dirham, Hussein, and pretty boy) its a good thing but when the GOP does it, out isn't? I like it.I never thought they would be using democrat attacks but it will give Barry less to attack him on.
Who says it's a good thing?Why when democrats fight dirty ( Dirham, Hussein, and pretty boy) its a good thing
Who says it isn't?but when the GOP does it, out isn't?
Romney holds a great chance of beating Obama, though a neocon like Santorum would get steamrolled.
Right now the Republicans are trying to do to Romney what the Democrats successfully did to Howard Dean in 2004 when he looked unbeatable at one point. The difference is that Romney is way too smart and doesn't act on emotion at all so he doesn't walk into any of the traps.
And yeah Santorum would do much worse against Obama than Romney. He's an idiot who's all emotion and zero intellect. Maybe his obsession with gay people and Muslims works with voters in Iowa but it won't work in the general election. While Romney is just as smart as if not smarter than Obama Obama would trounce Santorum in debates.
Karl rove showed that you can get elected by exciting the conservative base, instead of running towards the independent middle ground. What does Obama have to point to that makes you think he can near anyone. No one with this bad of unemployment numbers and high number of inflation has ever been re elected
He doesn't want to invade Iran, for one. He's not a religious nut, for two. Painting Santorum as Bush wouldn't be hard to do (they're the same asshole, basically).
The anti bush thing would as good as if bush tried to pump up the anti Clinton crowd in 04. The only people who still have I'll will towards bush are going to vote for Obama anyway.
The anti-Bush crowd is way bigger than any anti-Clinton sentiment. He already won one election running against Bush. Besides, Romney could go and perform an abortion on-stage at every campaign stop and still get the conservative base to show up to vote against the nigLuck_The_Fakers_Luck_The_Fakers_Luck_The_Fakers _Luck_The_Fakers_Luck_The_Fakers_Luck_The_Fakers_.
When he was in the senate, he wasn't considered one of the most corrupt senators out there, for three.
Also, the landscape of voters has changed a good amount since 2004 when Bush won by appealing to social conservatives. Millions of people my age who are predominantly pro-choice and supportive of gay marriage couldn't vote at the time, and millions of old people who were born and raised when racism and phobia was rampant, are now dead. This country has moved to the left on those issues in the last 8 years, between don't ask don't tell being repealed and other things. It's only a matter of time before gays are accepted in America the way other minorities are now.
Religious right is going with/pushing InSaneTaleban in SC,trying to stop Willard Gecko
Breaking: Religious Right Endorses Santorum; Aims to Stop Romney in South Carolina
At a weekend meeting in Texas of religious right leaders -- including Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council, James Dobson of Focus on the Family, Donald Wildmon of the American Family Association, and Gary Bauer of American Values -- participants agreed to coalesce behind former U.S. Sen. Rick Santorum in a bid to sway the largely evangelical base that will determine the outcome of the South Carolina presidential primary.
Around 150 influentials in the religious right converged on the ranch of Paul Pressler, a retired justice of the Texas Court of Appeals and a director of the right-wing Salem Communications, to try to arrive at something close to a consensus on a candidate. It took three ballots to get to an agreement, if not a consensus, according to Perkins.
http://www.alternet.org/module/print...ndviews/762781
Religious haters pushing their hate candidate.
Willard Gecko needs to renounce Mormonism and get baptized/born again in some mega-money-church, while supporting banning abortion, banning contraception, banning public health clinics, and forcibly sterilizing black women and illegal immigrant women. He'd win the Christian Taleban/supremacists, xenophobes, racists, bubbas in a landslide.
Last edited by boutons_deux; 01-14-2012 at 02:05 PM.
Honestly he is right Romney will get annihilated by Obama, the dude has yet to win or impress at the debates so far, & he won't have a teleprompter telling him what to say. The only candidate I can see giving Obama trouble in the debates is Gingrich. The debates will crush Romney's chances.
Last edited by Spurs da champs; 01-14-2012 at 02:15 PM.
He's saying Obama isn't a Christian nut and Santorum is, and saying that's why people will vote for Obama.
If Santorum became president that would make my decision about whether or not to move to Canada easy.
InSaneTorum is a Catholic nutter, no abortion in any case, no birth control, no sex ed, no porn, no sex outside of marriage, the hard-core Papist program.
This is funny coming from presumably an Obama supporter.
As for the rest of your message, Romney has taken the lion's share of the criticism in every debate as the front-runner, and he's still standing. In all of those debates he's only had one notable gaffe...betting Perry $10K. He may not have had any standout debates to this point, but you're not likely to when you're focusing on playing "defense".
I have no doubt Romney will be able to go toe-to-toe with Obama when neither have their trusty TelePrompTer to rely on.
Willard Gecko is "still standing" because the rest of the field so weak than even Repugs can't get excited, leaving the election to the SuperPACs.
Dude the only reason he's winning is because of his super pac taking out Gingrich, Perry, Cain & Bachman are dumb asses, Ron Paul is unelectable, & Santorum/Hunstsman are unknown.
Romney will get exposed in the debates against Obama because 1 on 1 & everybody will be watching.
Santorum is a bigger dumbass than Perry or Cain tbh. Bachmann is probably the dumbest of the bunch, but Santorum isn't very far behind
Man I don't think anybody could be stupider then Sarah Palin till I saw Rick Perry.Santorum is a bigger dumbass than Perry or Cain tbh. Bachmann is probably the dumbest of the bunch, but Santorum isn't very far behindYou being ing up to santorum
I think Perry is significantly dumber than Bachmann even. Did you see his college transcript where he was taking high school level physics classes and still only pulling Cs? Or pulling a D on high school math while in college?Santorum is a bigger dumbass than Perry or Cain tbh. Bachmann is probably the dumbest of the bunch, but Santorum isn't very far behind
When super PACS buy your ads for you the row is much easier to hoe for marginal candidates like Gingrich, Paul and Santorum. None of them seem inclined to drop out yet. It could be a long primary.
Perry is never being sincere. He's like a preacher passing around the collection basket for the new car fund.
Dems fight?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
