Reply With Quote
gfy
OK people. You say I am extreme. Why. Have at it, but no ankle biters please. Just honest criticism.
---Edit add---
OK, I obviously misworded my intent here. Sorry for that.
What I would like is actual examples of my extreme views. Criticize the actual view.
Last edited by Wild Cobra; 01-19-2012 at 03:46 AM.
gfy
Pretty much every time I read your posts I imagine them in Frank Burns' voice
hmm I don't think people think you're extremeI think they think you're full of
Now, I realize that this is a fairly moderate view.......I mean, I look over my shoulder whenever I'm near a person of color, any color. It's normal, right?
Why do we need an entire thread dedicated to your eventual obstinance and defensiveness?
to be fair, no anti ankle-biting defensiveness has yet been submitted by WC. if the observation is true generally, it is not yet true for this thread. just sayin.
Oh, I know. I think the OP was a fishing attempt that has thus far failed.
WC is curious what others think of him. Posters replied. How is that failure?
WC's views frankly seem to be very mainstream when it comes to right-rightwing Republicans; well, other than his view on stalking.
WC has been told in numerous threads what people think of him. And by reasonable posters making reasonable observations as often as by trolls. Most of the time, the discussion then devolves into Cobra either lashing out at the people critiquing him/his position/his posting style while stubbornly refusing to deal with whatever point is being made, or adopting wild, victimy delusions of persecution and accusing other posters of using him as a whipping boy while still stubbornly refusing to deal with whatever point is being made.
I am therefore su ious of WC suddenly making a thread in which he appears to be asking to learn the lesson that he has previously ignored so often. As a result, my sense is that this thread was started specifically for trolling and/or attention whoring purposes.
WC rationalizes and does not resort to personal attack. Unlike other posters here. Yes, I disagree with most of his views but...
WC is a comrade and a gentleman.
What I've always thought was so fascinating about Wild Cobra is his willingness to throw out an extreme thought and the immediate efforts to try to mitigate its extremity that follow when the objective extremity of the idea is pointed out to him.
'Cept for the times he's called me a .
I'll go ahead and say it.
WC wants to embody conventional wisdom, but he is only familiar with its slogans ( much as we all are, sadly.) He also strains to stake out the most extreme position allowable by his allegedly reasonable and conventional premisses.
At base WC is an extremist of a conventionalism he doesn't understand very well, with hilarious (and sometimes very disturbing) results.
Last edited by Winehole23; 01-20-2012 at 12:08 AM.
There's no doubt about it. I don't get why that bothers you tho.
If it bothered me, I wouldn't have contributed. I appreciate the machinations of the message board attention , but I do feel somewhat compelled to call it out when I see it.
Compe ion, and all that.
one upmanship.
is one of the nameless deities around here. the chiefest. three others being: expedience, invention and laziness.
Last edited by Winehole23; 01-21-2012 at 04:12 AM. Reason: the chiefest is boredom, actually
Oh he'll attack you. WC ain't afraid of calling you a Nazi or Marxist.
I will say WC is a faithful correspondent. He'll answer back to whatever silly submisssion.
Last edited by Winehole23; 01-18-2012 at 02:18 PM.
and he has maybe gotten a little better about being a meanie to everyone who fails immediately to agree
paternalistic archaisms like having vulgar pet names for women, apparently never went out of style. pity.
it's all part of WC's misconceived conventionality and crude rhetorical craft: a dog whistle for haters. where did DarkReign, jack and trainwreck go?
What for? When he's finally cornered (by his own extreme views) he'll pull the "you don't understand" card or the "why are you so close minded?" card, even though it's patently obvious that:
A) His extreme view is clear as a day
B) By looking at the absurdity of the scenarios he presents to his defense, you can tell he's given barely any thought at all before posting such idea.
Makes for great comedy, but hardly a thread worthy topic, IMO.
thread worthiness? is that a real constraint?
do you make it a habit to remark in unthreadworthy threads, or do you just hate WC?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
