Reply With Quote
The Saints use a Multiple Offense, not a spread. They use different formations to exploit mismatches and they run the football way more than a traditional spread offense.
Andrew Luck
Robert Griffin III
Ah okay. I mean its close. I just don't think luck is leaps and bounds ahead of rg3. But im a loyal nicca, I gotta ride with my niccas. Im still a VY fan, b.
The Saints use a Multiple Offense, not a spread. They use different formations to exploit mismatches and they run the football way more than a traditional spread offense.
It shouldn't
If Kevin Love or Dirk was Jewish I would take him number 1 in a heart beat. Who knows maybe Israel will develop the next Rubio. Sandy Koufax proved Jews could pitch. I bet not many people thought they could do that.
If Kevin Love or Dirk were Jewish they wouldn't be the athletes they are
No team in football uses their base offense 100% of the time during a game except maybe Oregon. Majority of the time the Saints offense is at spread. Sometimes that means 3 WRs and Graham at the slot. Or that means 4 WR with Graham on the line, whatever. Saints majority of the time uses at least 3 WRs at a time.
Most teams use 3 WRs the majority of games, especially the pass heavy teams.
Using 3-4 WR's in a set isn't the same thing as a spread offense you dumbass.
No
His offense consisted more than make one read, if it's not there either chuck it to spook #2 downfield or take off with it.
And Baylor had some damn good receivers that bailed out RG3 a lot too tbh
Using 4 WRs in a set is a spread offense. I thought s were supposed to be smart. Using 3 WRs and putting a TE in the slot could be described as a spread dumb .
The offense the Saints run is different than the ones Houston and Hawaii run.
what a dumb . You dont need 3 or 4 receivers. You dont need ANY receivers. You could have 3 fullbacks, 1 TE, and 2 QBs. The spread offense has nothing to do with who you have on the field, it's what you do to their defense.
Comversely, you can have an empty backfield and 5 wrs and be running an offense not anywhere closely resembling a spread.
Standford's Pro-Style Offense def gives Luck the upper hand here. RGIII has more big play making ability, but he was in a spread offense. Don't get me wrong, RGII has the talent to be better than Luck in the long-run, but right now I think Luck is more polished and NFL ready.
Hey, the Patriots use a slot receiver (3rd receiver) on virtually every play, I guess they also run a spread offense
has a RG ever lined up once under center?
I'd put the over/unders at 3 times for his entire football life.
Two tight ends and a Welker.Hey, the Patriots use a slot receiver (3rd receiver) on virtually every play, I guess they also run a spread offense
Just like the Baylor offense runs!
Aaron Hernandez sometimes lines up in the slot
SPREAD OFFENSE!!!
LOL no dumb , I wasn't ing talking to you. I was having a conversation with another poster regarding the Saints offense. He says the Saints dont use a spread. I disagreed with him.
Spread offenses traditionally uses 4 or more WRs. When When I say WR I dont necessarily mean "wide receiver" I am referring to the players the lined up on the out side. My fault, I shouldn't have refered to them as "WR". So yes, When Hernandez lines up at slot and 3 wide receivers line up on the outside its a spread.Hey, the Patriots use a slot receiver (3rd receiver) on virtually every play, I guess they also run a spread offense
No its not. You dont ing get it. The word "spread" in spread offense doesnt refer to how the offense is lined up.
Jay I still wouldn't call the Saints offense a spread. When think of a spread I think of the Oregon Ducks, Houston Cougars, and SMU. Warren Moon's Oilers ran a spread tho.
Last edited by Huey Freeman; 01-19-2012 at 04:09 PM.
?
What does spread mean?
I played the game. I guess I dont know as much as I thought I did.
Seriously? It's in the name itself
Spread offenses spread (imagine that!) the defense/field horizontally.
You can have 4/5 WR's and TE's, but if they're all running post routes then it's not a ing spread...it really is a simple concept--especially since the name gives it away
Ok, thank for thatSeriously? It's in the name itself
Spread offenses spread (imagine that!) the defense/field horizontally.
You can have 4/5 WR's and TE's, but if they're all running post routes then it's not a ing spread...it really is a simple concept--especially since the name gives it away
No I know what I'm dealing with here.
Never again
I cant leave this alone man.Seriously? It's in the name itself
Spread offenses spread (imagine that!) the defense/field horizontally.
You can have 4/5 WR's and TE's, but if they're all running post routes then it's not a ing spread...it really is a simple concept--especially since the name gives it away
If you have 4/5 WR and a TE or whatever lined up on the outside, your in a spread offense. It does not matter what the routes of the receivers are. They could be running vertically or horizontally. You could be running the ball (with the outside receivers blocking) and in would still be in a spread offense.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
